Deep learning-driven multi-class classification of brain strokes using computed tomography: A step towards enhanced diagnostic precision

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chathura D. Kulathilake , Jeevani Udupihille , Sachith P. Abeysundara , Atsushi Senoo
{"title":"Deep learning-driven multi-class classification of brain strokes using computed tomography: A step towards enhanced diagnostic precision","authors":"Chathura D. Kulathilake ,&nbsp;Jeevani Udupihille ,&nbsp;Sachith P. Abeysundara ,&nbsp;Atsushi Senoo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and validate deep learning models leveraging CT imaging for the prediction and classification of brain stroke conditions, with the potential to enhance accuracy and support clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective, bi-center study included data from 250 patients, with a dataset of 8186 CT images collected from 2017 to 2022. Two AI models were developed using the Expanded ResNet101 deep learning framework as a two-step model. Model performance was evaluated using confusion matrices, supplemented by external validation with an independent dataset. External validation was conducted by an expert and two external members. Overall accuracy, confidence intervals, Cohen’s Kappa value, and McNemar’s test <em>P</em>-values were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8186 CT images were incorporated, with 6386 images used for the training and 900 datasets for testing and validation in Model 01. Further, 1619 CT images were used for training and 600 datasets for testing and validation in Model 02. The average accuracy, precision, and F1 score for both models were assessed: Model 01 achieved 99.6 %, 99.4 %, and 99.6 % respectively, whereas Model 02 achieved 99.2 %, 98.8 %, and 99.1 %. The external validation accuracies were 78.6 % (95 % CI: 0.73,0.83; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and 60.2 % (95 % CI: 0.48,0.70; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) for Models 01 and 02 respectively, as evaluated by the expert.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy, precision, and F1 scores in predicting outcomes for brain stroke patients. With larger cohort and diverse radiologic mimics, these models could support clinicians in prognosis and decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 112109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25001950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop and validate deep learning models leveraging CT imaging for the prediction and classification of brain stroke conditions, with the potential to enhance accuracy and support clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods

This retrospective, bi-center study included data from 250 patients, with a dataset of 8186 CT images collected from 2017 to 2022. Two AI models were developed using the Expanded ResNet101 deep learning framework as a two-step model. Model performance was evaluated using confusion matrices, supplemented by external validation with an independent dataset. External validation was conducted by an expert and two external members. Overall accuracy, confidence intervals, Cohen’s Kappa value, and McNemar’s test P-values were calculated.

Results

A total of 8186 CT images were incorporated, with 6386 images used for the training and 900 datasets for testing and validation in Model 01. Further, 1619 CT images were used for training and 600 datasets for testing and validation in Model 02. The average accuracy, precision, and F1 score for both models were assessed: Model 01 achieved 99.6 %, 99.4 %, and 99.6 % respectively, whereas Model 02 achieved 99.2 %, 98.8 %, and 99.1 %. The external validation accuracies were 78.6 % (95 % CI: 0.73,0.83; P < 0.001) and 60.2 % (95 % CI: 0.48,0.70; P < 0.001) for Models 01 and 02 respectively, as evaluated by the expert.

Conclusion

Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy, precision, and F1 scores in predicting outcomes for brain stroke patients. With larger cohort and diverse radiologic mimics, these models could support clinicians in prognosis and decision-making.

Abstract Image

使用计算机断层扫描对脑卒中进行深度学习驱动的多类分类:迈向提高诊断精度的一步
目的开发并验证利用CT成像进行脑卒中预测和分类的深度学习模型,以提高准确性并支持临床决策。材料和方法本回顾性双中心研究纳入了250例患者的数据,数据集为2017年至2022年收集的8186张CT图像。使用扩展的ResNet101深度学习框架作为两步模型开发了两个人工智能模型。使用混淆矩阵评估模型性能,并辅以独立数据集的外部验证。外部验证由一名专家和两名外部成员进行。计算总体精度、置信区间、Cohen’s Kappa值和McNemar’s检验p值。结果共纳入了8186张CT图像,其中6386张用于训练,900个数据集用于模型01的测试和验证。在模型02中,使用1619张CT图像进行训练,使用600个数据集进行测试和验证。对两种模型的平均准确度、精密度和F1分数进行评估:模型01分别达到99.6%、99.4%和99.6%,而模型02达到99.2%、98.8%和99.1%。外部验证准确度为78.6% (95% CI: 0.73,0.83;P & lt;0.001)和60.2% (95% CI: 0.48,0.70;P & lt;模型01和02分别为0.001),由专家评估。结论深度学习模型在预测脑卒中患者预后方面具有较高的准确性、精密度和F1评分。通过更大的队列和多样化的放射模拟,这些模型可以支持临床医生的预后和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信