Predicting pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain using machine learning

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Atefe Ashrafi , Daniel Thomson , Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi , Amir Marashi , Darren Beales , Dragana Ceprnja , Amitabh Gupta
{"title":"Predicting pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain using machine learning","authors":"Atefe Ashrafi ,&nbsp;Daniel Thomson ,&nbsp;Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi ,&nbsp;Amir Marashi ,&nbsp;Darren Beales ,&nbsp;Dragana Ceprnja ,&nbsp;Amitabh Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common complication during gestation which negatively influences pregnant women's quality of life. There are numerous risk factors associated with PPGP, however, there is limited information about being able to predict the diagnosis of PPGP.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare machine learning (ML) and traditional predictive modelling to predict the clinical diagnosis of PPGP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study reanalysed data from 780 pregnant women attending a tertiary hospital. ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest, Xtreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and K-Nearest Neighbors, were used to predict the clinical diagnosis of PPGP. Feature selection methods and cross-validation were employed to optimize model performance, with the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) as the primary outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ML models, particularly XGBoost and LR, demonstrated high levels of predictive accuracy (AUROC = 0.70). Key predictive factors were a history of low back pain/pelvic girdle pain (LBP/PGP) in previous pregnancies, family history, gestational age, and a longer duration of standing during the day. The history of LBP/PGP in previous pregnancies emerged as the most significant predictor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlighted the potential of ML models to enhance the ability to predict PPGP and offers a more accurate and comprehensive approach to identifying women at risk of PPGP. The integration of ML techniques into clinical practice could improve early identification and inform preventative and intervention strategies, potentially reducing the impact of PPGP on pregnant women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 103321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225000694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common complication during gestation which negatively influences pregnant women's quality of life. There are numerous risk factors associated with PPGP, however, there is limited information about being able to predict the diagnosis of PPGP.

Objective

To compare machine learning (ML) and traditional predictive modelling to predict the clinical diagnosis of PPGP.

Methods

This study reanalysed data from 780 pregnant women attending a tertiary hospital. ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest, Xtreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and K-Nearest Neighbors, were used to predict the clinical diagnosis of PPGP. Feature selection methods and cross-validation were employed to optimize model performance, with the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) as the primary outcome measure.

Results

The ML models, particularly XGBoost and LR, demonstrated high levels of predictive accuracy (AUROC = 0.70). Key predictive factors were a history of low back pain/pelvic girdle pain (LBP/PGP) in previous pregnancies, family history, gestational age, and a longer duration of standing during the day. The history of LBP/PGP in previous pregnancies emerged as the most significant predictor.

Conclusions

This study highlighted the potential of ML models to enhance the ability to predict PPGP and offers a more accurate and comprehensive approach to identifying women at risk of PPGP. The integration of ML techniques into clinical practice could improve early identification and inform preventative and intervention strategies, potentially reducing the impact of PPGP on pregnant women.
使用机器学习预测与妊娠相关的骨盆带疼痛
妊娠相关性骨盆带痛(PPGP)是妊娠期常见的并发症,对孕妇的生活质量产生负面影响。有许多与PPGP相关的危险因素,然而,关于能够预测PPGP诊断的信息有限。目的比较机器学习(ML)与传统预测模型对PPGP临床诊断的预测价值。方法本研究重新分析了780名在三级医院就诊的孕妇的资料。采用Logistic回归(LR)、随机森林(Random Forest)、Xtreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost)和K-Nearest Neighbors等ML算法预测PPGP的临床诊断。以受试者工作特征曲线下面积(Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, AUROC)为主要指标,采用特征选择和交叉验证方法优化模型性能。结果ML模型,特别是XGBoost和LR,显示出较高的预测准确性(AUROC = 0.70)。主要预测因素为妊娠前腰痛/骨盆带痛(LBP/PGP)史、家族史、胎龄、白天站立时间较长。以前妊娠的LBP/PGP病史是最重要的预测因子。本研究强调了ML模型在提高PPGP预测能力方面的潜力,并提供了一种更准确、更全面的方法来识别有PPGP风险的女性。将ML技术整合到临床实践中可以改善早期识别,并为预防和干预策略提供信息,潜在地减少PPGP对孕妇的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信