"I don't know how you can overdose smoking them:" Perceptions of overdose risks among persons who use illicit fentanyl-laced counterfeit pills

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Raminta Daniulaityte , Kaylin Sweeney , Patricia Timmons , Madeline Hooten , Elisabeth Williams , Haley Coles , Danielle Russell , Frank LoVecchio
{"title":"\"I don't know how you can overdose smoking them:\" Perceptions of overdose risks among persons who use illicit fentanyl-laced counterfeit pills","authors":"Raminta Daniulaityte ,&nbsp;Kaylin Sweeney ,&nbsp;Patricia Timmons ,&nbsp;Madeline Hooten ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Williams ,&nbsp;Haley Coles ,&nbsp;Danielle Russell ,&nbsp;Frank LoVecchio","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) remains the primary driver of overdose mortality in the US. Western states saw significant increases in IMF-laced counterfeit pain pills (“blues”). This qualitative study, conducted in Phoenix, Arizona, provides an in-depth understanding of how overdose-related risks are viewed and experienced by people who use “blues.”</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 11/2022–12/2023, the study recruited 60 individuals who used “blues” using targeted and network-based recruitment. Qualitative interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 41.7 % women, and 56.7 % whites. 55.3 % had prior overdose, but most (62.2 %) rated their current risk as none/low. Risk perceptions centered on a multi-level calculus of drug market conditions, individual vulnerabilities, and behavioral factors. Smoking was considered a “normative” way of using “blues”, and most viewed it as protective against overdose in comparison to injection and other routes of use. Drug market conditions and the unpredictability of “blues” were emphasized as important factor of overdose risk. However, some believed that over time, the quality/consistency of “blues” improved, and they became less risky. Many also expressed fears about the emerging local availability of powder fentanyl and its risk. Views about safer dosing, polydrug use, tolerance, and health emphasized personal responsibility and individual vulnerability to overdose risks. Discussions of protective behaviors, including take-home naloxone, varied bases on the perceptions of overdose risks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings emphasize the need for close monitoring of local IMF markets and design of comprehensive interventions and risk communication strategies to address perceptions that minimize IMF-laced counterfeit pill risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925001070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) remains the primary driver of overdose mortality in the US. Western states saw significant increases in IMF-laced counterfeit pain pills (“blues”). This qualitative study, conducted in Phoenix, Arizona, provides an in-depth understanding of how overdose-related risks are viewed and experienced by people who use “blues.”

Methods

Between 11/2022–12/2023, the study recruited 60 individuals who used “blues” using targeted and network-based recruitment. Qualitative interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo.

Results

The sample included 41.7 % women, and 56.7 % whites. 55.3 % had prior overdose, but most (62.2 %) rated their current risk as none/low. Risk perceptions centered on a multi-level calculus of drug market conditions, individual vulnerabilities, and behavioral factors. Smoking was considered a “normative” way of using “blues”, and most viewed it as protective against overdose in comparison to injection and other routes of use. Drug market conditions and the unpredictability of “blues” were emphasized as important factor of overdose risk. However, some believed that over time, the quality/consistency of “blues” improved, and they became less risky. Many also expressed fears about the emerging local availability of powder fentanyl and its risk. Views about safer dosing, polydrug use, tolerance, and health emphasized personal responsibility and individual vulnerability to overdose risks. Discussions of protective behaviors, including take-home naloxone, varied bases on the perceptions of overdose risks.

Conclusions

The findings emphasize the need for close monitoring of local IMF markets and design of comprehensive interventions and risk communication strategies to address perceptions that minimize IMF-laced counterfeit pill risks.
“我不知道你怎么能过量吸食它们:”使用非法芬太尼假药的人对过量风险的看法
目的非法制造的芬太尼(IMF)仍然是美国过量死亡的主要原因。在西方各州,掺有imf成分的假冒止痛药(“蓝色”)大幅增加。这项在亚利桑那州凤凰城进行的定性研究,深入了解了使用“忧郁”的人是如何看待和体验与过量相关的风险的。方法:在2022年11月至2023年12月期间,该研究通过定向和基于网络的招聘招募了60名使用“忧郁”的人。使用NVivo对定性访谈进行记录、转录和分析。结果女性占41.7%,白人占56.7%。55.3%的人有用药过量史,但大多数(62.2%)认为他们目前的风险为无/低。风险感知集中在药物市场条件、个人脆弱性和行为因素的多层次计算上。吸烟被认为是使用“蓝色”的一种“规范”方式,与注射和其他使用方式相比,大多数人认为它可以防止过量使用。药物市场状况和“蓝色”的不可预测性被强调为过量风险的重要因素。然而,一些人认为,随着时间的推移,“蓝色”的质量/一致性得到改善,它们的风险也会降低。许多人还对芬太尼粉末在当地的可得性及其风险表示担忧。关于更安全的剂量、多种药物使用、耐受性和健康的观点强调个人责任和个人对过量风险的脆弱性。关于保护性行为的讨论,包括带回家的纳洛酮,基于对过量风险的认识而有所不同。结论:研究结果强调,有必要密切监测当地的IMF市场,设计全面的干预措施和风险沟通战略,以解决人们的认知问题,最大限度地降低与IMF有关的假药风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信