Vigilance decrement in automated vs. manual driving: Insights from multimodal data

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Chuanggao Lin , Fangda Zhang , Yong Zhang , Tingru Zhang
{"title":"Vigilance decrement in automated vs. manual driving: Insights from multimodal data","authors":"Chuanggao Lin ,&nbsp;Fangda Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Zhang ,&nbsp;Tingru Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Driver vigilance is a crucial factor in road safety. Vigilance decrement can pose a significant challenge under Level 2 driving automation, where drivers are relieved of active vehicle control but must still continuously monitor the system. This study aims to evaluate the dynamic changes in vigilance during prolonged automated driving using multimodal data. A simulated driving experiment was conducted in which participants drove in either manual or automated mode while responding to randomly presented traffic sign targets. Subjective vigilance ratings, target detection performance, and physiological signals, including eye movements, electroencephalogram (EEG), and electrocardiogram (ECG), were recorded and analyzed. The results revealed that the first significant vigilance decrement in automated mode occurred around 15 min into driving, with a second decrement occurring between 25 and 40 min. In contrast, the first significant vigilance decrement in manual driving was observed after 25 to 40 min of driving, later than in automated driving. Additionally, vigilance decrement was more pronounced in automated driving, as evidenced by lower subjective vigilance ratings, reduced fixation counts, and increased EEG wave powers. Through cross-validation of multimodal metrics, this study demonstrates that vigilance decrement occurs earlier and to a greater extent in automated driving compared to manual driving. These findings provide a valuable theoretical foundation for developing intervention strategies to enhance driver vigilance and contribute to the overall improvement in driving safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 207-220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driver vigilance is a crucial factor in road safety. Vigilance decrement can pose a significant challenge under Level 2 driving automation, where drivers are relieved of active vehicle control but must still continuously monitor the system. This study aims to evaluate the dynamic changes in vigilance during prolonged automated driving using multimodal data. A simulated driving experiment was conducted in which participants drove in either manual or automated mode while responding to randomly presented traffic sign targets. Subjective vigilance ratings, target detection performance, and physiological signals, including eye movements, electroencephalogram (EEG), and electrocardiogram (ECG), were recorded and analyzed. The results revealed that the first significant vigilance decrement in automated mode occurred around 15 min into driving, with a second decrement occurring between 25 and 40 min. In contrast, the first significant vigilance decrement in manual driving was observed after 25 to 40 min of driving, later than in automated driving. Additionally, vigilance decrement was more pronounced in automated driving, as evidenced by lower subjective vigilance ratings, reduced fixation counts, and increased EEG wave powers. Through cross-validation of multimodal metrics, this study demonstrates that vigilance decrement occurs earlier and to a greater extent in automated driving compared to manual driving. These findings provide a valuable theoretical foundation for developing intervention strategies to enhance driver vigilance and contribute to the overall improvement in driving safety.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信