The ethics of behaviour-based insurance models: Solidarity-based concerns in Germany's statutory health insurance

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carl Justus Bredthauer , Eva Kuhn , Alena Buyx
{"title":"The ethics of behaviour-based insurance models: Solidarity-based concerns in Germany's statutory health insurance","authors":"Carl Justus Bredthauer ,&nbsp;Eva Kuhn ,&nbsp;Alena Buyx","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sickness funds have begun to harness digital behavioural data to incentivise physical activity in their members. This ethical and societal effects of this phenomenon remain largely unclear, especially in solidarity-based insurance systems. Therefore, this study analysed the risks and benefits of such programmes with respect to solidarity against the background of recent efforts by German statutory health insurance funds to integrate digital tracking data into their bonus programmes. Key, potential benefits include new forms of solidarity that may emerge based on sharing personal health data. The incentives introduced by these reward programmes could lead to efficiency gains used to benefit society. However, three conceptual pitfalls have been identified: First, the data gathering method may penalise certain vulnerable groups. Such discrimination could, however, be avoided by minimising barriers to participation. Second, digitally mediated bonus programmes may create deadweight effects, i.e. beneficiaries are likely to already be healthy and active. Consequently, behavioural targets should be designed to consider individual prerequisites. Lastly, linking premiums to behaviour might diminish solidarity with poor risks within statutory health insurances and between statutory and private health insurance. Hence, this study aimed to stimulate debate on the ethical and societal implications of the systemic integration of eHealth innovations into healthcare systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sickness funds have begun to harness digital behavioural data to incentivise physical activity in their members. This ethical and societal effects of this phenomenon remain largely unclear, especially in solidarity-based insurance systems. Therefore, this study analysed the risks and benefits of such programmes with respect to solidarity against the background of recent efforts by German statutory health insurance funds to integrate digital tracking data into their bonus programmes. Key, potential benefits include new forms of solidarity that may emerge based on sharing personal health data. The incentives introduced by these reward programmes could lead to efficiency gains used to benefit society. However, three conceptual pitfalls have been identified: First, the data gathering method may penalise certain vulnerable groups. Such discrimination could, however, be avoided by minimising barriers to participation. Second, digitally mediated bonus programmes may create deadweight effects, i.e. beneficiaries are likely to already be healthy and active. Consequently, behavioural targets should be designed to consider individual prerequisites. Lastly, linking premiums to behaviour might diminish solidarity with poor risks within statutory health insurances and between statutory and private health insurance. Hence, this study aimed to stimulate debate on the ethical and societal implications of the systemic integration of eHealth innovations into healthcare systems.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信