Endocrine-disrupting pesticide exposure relevant to reproductive health: a case study from Costa Rica

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Navilla Apú, François Rommes, Maricruz Alvarado-Arias, Michael Méndez-Rivera, Verónica Lizano-Fallas
{"title":"Endocrine-disrupting pesticide exposure relevant to reproductive health: a case study from Costa Rica","authors":"Navilla Apú,&nbsp;François Rommes,&nbsp;Maricruz Alvarado-Arias,&nbsp;Michael Méndez-Rivera,&nbsp;Verónica Lizano-Fallas","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14011-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global pesticide use has increased significantly over the past decade, leading to greater exposure to contaminants and associated health risks. Endocrine-disrupting pesticides have gained attention due to their strong association with human reproductive impairments and rising global infertility rates. In Costa Rica, studies have reported reduced fertility among agricultural workers and a higher prevalence of male infertility in regions with intensive pesticide use. However, the prioritization of pesticides detected in human fluids, based on their potential impact on reproductive health, has not been conducted. Here, analyzing human biomonitoring studies in the country over the last 25 years, 13 pesticides were identified and prioritized. Mancozeb ranked highest (14.8%), followed by dieldrin (12.1%) and chlorothalonil (12.0%). Eight criteria were used for prioritization, with non-carcinogenic risk, reported reproductive effects, and endocrine disruptor classification as key factors. This comprehensive approach highlights how multiple criteria collectively inform pesticide prioritization in relation to reproductive health risks. The findings indicated that while Costa Rica is a regional leader in pesticide biomonitoring, significant gaps remain, including limited data on unstudied pesticides and general population exposures. Establishing robust biomonitoring programs and public health surveillance systems to generate updated data and support evidence-based prevention policies is recommended. Additionally, the results of this study provide a valuable framework for guiding future research on the potential effects of pesticide mixtures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-025-14011-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14011-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global pesticide use has increased significantly over the past decade, leading to greater exposure to contaminants and associated health risks. Endocrine-disrupting pesticides have gained attention due to their strong association with human reproductive impairments and rising global infertility rates. In Costa Rica, studies have reported reduced fertility among agricultural workers and a higher prevalence of male infertility in regions with intensive pesticide use. However, the prioritization of pesticides detected in human fluids, based on their potential impact on reproductive health, has not been conducted. Here, analyzing human biomonitoring studies in the country over the last 25 years, 13 pesticides were identified and prioritized. Mancozeb ranked highest (14.8%), followed by dieldrin (12.1%) and chlorothalonil (12.0%). Eight criteria were used for prioritization, with non-carcinogenic risk, reported reproductive effects, and endocrine disruptor classification as key factors. This comprehensive approach highlights how multiple criteria collectively inform pesticide prioritization in relation to reproductive health risks. The findings indicated that while Costa Rica is a regional leader in pesticide biomonitoring, significant gaps remain, including limited data on unstudied pesticides and general population exposures. Establishing robust biomonitoring programs and public health surveillance systems to generate updated data and support evidence-based prevention policies is recommended. Additionally, the results of this study provide a valuable framework for guiding future research on the potential effects of pesticide mixtures.

与生殖健康有关的干扰内分泌的农药接触:哥斯达黎加的案例研究
在过去十年中,全球农药使用量大幅增加,导致更多地接触污染物和相关的健康风险。干扰内分泌的农药由于与人类生殖障碍和全球不孕率上升密切相关而受到关注。在哥斯达黎加,研究报告说,农业工人的生育率下降,而在大量使用农药的地区,男性不育症的发生率较高。然而,尚未根据在人体体液中检测到的农药对生殖健康的潜在影响,对其进行优先排序。通过分析该国过去25年的人体生物监测研究,确定了13种农药并对其进行了优先排序。代森锰锌含量最高(14.8%),其次是狄氏剂(12.1%)和百菌清(12.0%)。8项标准用于优先排序,其中非致癌风险、已报告的生殖影响和内分泌干扰物分类为关键因素。这一综合办法突出了多种标准如何共同为与生殖健康风险有关的农药优先排序提供信息。调查结果表明,虽然哥斯达黎加在农药生物监测方面处于区域领先地位,但仍存在重大差距,包括关于未经研究的农药和一般人群暴露的有限数据。建议建立健全的生物监测规划和公共卫生监测系统,以生成最新数据并支持基于证据的预防政策。此外,本研究结果为指导未来农药混合施用潜在影响的研究提供了有价值的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信