Public attitudes toward state-led urban village rehabilitation in Shenzhen, China

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Lin Jiang , Yani Lai , Yuzhe Wu , Rong Wang , Xiao Tang , Xiaoming Li , Ding Ma , Renzhong Guo
{"title":"Public attitudes toward state-led urban village rehabilitation in Shenzhen, China","authors":"Lin Jiang ,&nbsp;Yani Lai ,&nbsp;Yuzhe Wu ,&nbsp;Rong Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Tang ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li ,&nbsp;Ding Ma ,&nbsp;Renzhong Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>State-led urban village rehabilitation has emerged as an important approach in urban development, addressing the dilemma of inadequate housing supply and poor-quality aging buildings. Nowadays, it has evolved into a widely discussed public issue with far-reaching societal impacts. However, few research explores public attitudes toward such state-led urban rehabilitation initiatives using large-scale data sets. This study investigates how the state-led urban village rehabilitation project in Shenzhen, China, was discussed on Weibo, a Chinese platform similar to Twitter. By applying Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modelling analysis and the Natural Language Processing (NLP) technique for sentiment analysis, the study analyses a substantial dataset comprising 790 Weibo posts and 2096 comments. This methodological approach has captured four main topics of public focus, including increasing rent and large-scale displacement, spatial transformation, inhabitants' interest, and capital and power relationships. The findings reveal spatial transformation and improvement of living conditions are significantly linked with positive attitudes toward urban village rehabilitation projects. Conversely, negative sentiments emerge from fears over the increased rent and the risk of displacement, the anger over the loss of residents' interests, and the critiques of profit-driven motives underpinning the capital and power nexus. This study further provides a valuable reference for evaluating and refining urban rehabilitation strategies regarding the protection of the inhabitants' interests and the promotion of social sustainability based on the most concerned factors of the public.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 103404"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525001201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

State-led urban village rehabilitation has emerged as an important approach in urban development, addressing the dilemma of inadequate housing supply and poor-quality aging buildings. Nowadays, it has evolved into a widely discussed public issue with far-reaching societal impacts. However, few research explores public attitudes toward such state-led urban rehabilitation initiatives using large-scale data sets. This study investigates how the state-led urban village rehabilitation project in Shenzhen, China, was discussed on Weibo, a Chinese platform similar to Twitter. By applying Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modelling analysis and the Natural Language Processing (NLP) technique for sentiment analysis, the study analyses a substantial dataset comprising 790 Weibo posts and 2096 comments. This methodological approach has captured four main topics of public focus, including increasing rent and large-scale displacement, spatial transformation, inhabitants' interest, and capital and power relationships. The findings reveal spatial transformation and improvement of living conditions are significantly linked with positive attitudes toward urban village rehabilitation projects. Conversely, negative sentiments emerge from fears over the increased rent and the risk of displacement, the anger over the loss of residents' interests, and the critiques of profit-driven motives underpinning the capital and power nexus. This study further provides a valuable reference for evaluating and refining urban rehabilitation strategies regarding the protection of the inhabitants' interests and the promotion of social sustainability based on the most concerned factors of the public.
公众对国家主导的深圳城中村改造的态度
国家主导的城中村改造已成为城市发展的重要途径,解决了住房供应不足和建筑质量差、老化的困境。如今,它已经发展成为一个广泛讨论的公共问题,具有深远的社会影响。然而,很少有研究利用大规模数据集探讨公众对这种国家主导的城市修复计划的态度。本研究调查了中国深圳国家主导的城中村改造项目是如何在微博(一个类似Twitter的中国平台)上进行讨论的。通过应用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)进行主题建模分析和自然语言处理(NLP)技术进行情感分析,该研究分析了包含790条微博和2096条评论的大量数据集。这种方法论方法抓住了公众关注的四个主要话题,包括租金上涨和大规模流离失所、空间转型、居民利益以及资本和权力关系。研究发现,空间改造和居住条件的改善与对城中村改造项目的积极态度显著相关。相反,负面情绪来自对租金上涨和流离失所风险的担忧,对居民利益丧失的愤怒,以及对支撑资本和权力关系的利润驱动动机的批评。该研究进一步为基于公众最关心的因素来评估和完善城市复修策略,以保护居民利益和促进社会可持续性提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信