{"title":"Techno-economic and emissions comparison of waste-to-fuel via hydrothermal liquefaction, transesterification, and incineration","authors":"Muhammad Usman","doi":"10.1016/j.ject.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global shift toward sustainable waste management and renewable energy has sparked interest in biofuel production from sewage sludge (SS). This study evaluated four waste-to-biofuel processes like Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) with upgrading, Transesterification, and Incineration with and without energy recovery using ASPEN Plus V12 to assess their techno-economic, energy, and environmental performance. HTL with upgrading emerged as the most efficient, generating ∼4,000,000 MJ/year and emitting ∼700 tonnes/year of CO<sub>2</sub>. Transesterification yielded ∼2,850,000 MJ/year, emitting ∼1200 tonnes/year due to post-lipid extraction incineration. Incineration without energy recovery was least efficient, consuming ∼5,000,000 MJ/year and emitting ∼3000 tonnes/year of CO<sub>2</sub>, with energy recovery yielding only ∼1,250,000 MJ/year. Financially, HTL with upgrading demonstrated strong profitability with a potential Net Present Value (NPV) of 112.9 million US dollars (MUS$), while Transesterification achieved an NPV of 23.4 MUS$. Both processes were sensitive to operating costs: a 50 % increase could reduce HTL’s NPV to 62.7 MUS$, while pushing Transesterification into a loss. Capital cost reductions could further boost HTL’s profitability, highlighting its economic resilience, unlike incineration, which remained financially unviable. In summary, HTL with upgrading offered 30 % higher energy output and 70 % lower emissions than incineration, making it a scalable, sustainable approach for SS management and biofuel production. However, a complete life cycle assessment could further enhance its potential by identifying additional environmental and economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economy and Technology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 237-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949948824000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The global shift toward sustainable waste management and renewable energy has sparked interest in biofuel production from sewage sludge (SS). This study evaluated four waste-to-biofuel processes like Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) with upgrading, Transesterification, and Incineration with and without energy recovery using ASPEN Plus V12 to assess their techno-economic, energy, and environmental performance. HTL with upgrading emerged as the most efficient, generating ∼4,000,000 MJ/year and emitting ∼700 tonnes/year of CO2. Transesterification yielded ∼2,850,000 MJ/year, emitting ∼1200 tonnes/year due to post-lipid extraction incineration. Incineration without energy recovery was least efficient, consuming ∼5,000,000 MJ/year and emitting ∼3000 tonnes/year of CO2, with energy recovery yielding only ∼1,250,000 MJ/year. Financially, HTL with upgrading demonstrated strong profitability with a potential Net Present Value (NPV) of 112.9 million US dollars (MUS$), while Transesterification achieved an NPV of 23.4 MUS$. Both processes were sensitive to operating costs: a 50 % increase could reduce HTL’s NPV to 62.7 MUS$, while pushing Transesterification into a loss. Capital cost reductions could further boost HTL’s profitability, highlighting its economic resilience, unlike incineration, which remained financially unviable. In summary, HTL with upgrading offered 30 % higher energy output and 70 % lower emissions than incineration, making it a scalable, sustainable approach for SS management and biofuel production. However, a complete life cycle assessment could further enhance its potential by identifying additional environmental and economic benefits.