{"title":"Lesson learnt from implementing a CRRT reimbursement program in a resource-limited setting","authors":"Prit Kusirisin , Sadudee Peerapornratana , Jiratorn Sutawong , Yot Teerawattananon , Nattachai Srisawat","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute kidney injury (AKI) poses significant risks, including high mortality and progression to chronic kidney disease. Effective treatment modalities include peritoneal dialysis (PD), intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). While each modality has specific advantages, CRRT is particularly vital for critically ill patients with severe AKI and contraindications for IHD. Despite its clinical benefits, the high cost of CRRT presents challenges, especially in resource-limited settings like Thailand.</div><div>This manuscript reviews the process of integrating CRRT into Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). Initial proposals in 2017 highlighted CRRT's importance, yet its high costs posed barriers to inclusion. A rigorous policy development process, emphasizing evidence-based and participatory decision-making, led to the proposal's acceptance in 2018. Key recommendations included optimizing reimbursement rates and increasing budget allocations.</div><div>By 2022, CRRT reimbursement was incorporated into the UCS, significantly improving access to treatment for patients with AKI. Specific outcomes from our 2-year policy implementation, including patient outcomes such as mortality, renal recovery, length of hospital stay, and complications, as well as cost-saving outcomes reflecting the need for intensive care resources, are ongoing. These cost-benefit analyses, along with policy adjustments, are necessary to ensure continued equitable and effective treatment. This case underscores the importance of aligning reimbursement strategies with clinical needs and financial realities to enhance both healthcare outcomes and system sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 155089"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) poses significant risks, including high mortality and progression to chronic kidney disease. Effective treatment modalities include peritoneal dialysis (PD), intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). While each modality has specific advantages, CRRT is particularly vital for critically ill patients with severe AKI and contraindications for IHD. Despite its clinical benefits, the high cost of CRRT presents challenges, especially in resource-limited settings like Thailand.
This manuscript reviews the process of integrating CRRT into Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). Initial proposals in 2017 highlighted CRRT's importance, yet its high costs posed barriers to inclusion. A rigorous policy development process, emphasizing evidence-based and participatory decision-making, led to the proposal's acceptance in 2018. Key recommendations included optimizing reimbursement rates and increasing budget allocations.
By 2022, CRRT reimbursement was incorporated into the UCS, significantly improving access to treatment for patients with AKI. Specific outcomes from our 2-year policy implementation, including patient outcomes such as mortality, renal recovery, length of hospital stay, and complications, as well as cost-saving outcomes reflecting the need for intensive care resources, are ongoing. These cost-benefit analyses, along with policy adjustments, are necessary to ensure continued equitable and effective treatment. This case underscores the importance of aligning reimbursement strategies with clinical needs and financial realities to enhance both healthcare outcomes and system sustainability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.