Manual Soil Resmoothing After Wild Boar Rooting Enables Resuming Mowing Management in Hay Meadows Without Hindering Vegetation Recovery

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Alida A. Hábenczyus , Csaba Biró , Csaba Tölgyesi
{"title":"Manual Soil Resmoothing After Wild Boar Rooting Enables Resuming Mowing Management in Hay Meadows Without Hindering Vegetation Recovery","authors":"Alida A. Hábenczyus ,&nbsp;Csaba Biró ,&nbsp;Csaba Tölgyesi","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wild boar (<em>Sus scrofa</em>) is a widespread megaherbivore that can intensively disturb large areas of its habitat both in its native and non-native ranges, when populations reach high densities. The main problem is its rooting habit, which entails intensive disturbance of the topsoil and herbaceous layer. The extent of concomitant habitat degradation varies across ecoregions; some ecosystems are rather resilient, although the damages are long-lasting in others. In mown meadows, a secondary problem is the inability to resume mowing due to the uneven soil surface of rooted patches. This can lead to both economic loss and a loss of management-dependent biodiversity. We assessed the short-term effects of rooting on vegetation cover and composition in central European permanent hay meadows and tested the utility of manual soil surface resmoothing to enable the continuation of mowing. We found that rooting increased bare soil surface but vegetation recovery occurred within a year. Similarly, high resilience was found for species composition. We could not detect any difference between rooted and intact grassland patches after 1 yr. This short-term perturbation of the composition could be associated with a temporary decrease in grassland specialist species and an increase in ruderal and pioneer species. Soil surface resmoothing was an additional disturbance, but vegetation cover returned to the level of intact grasslands within a year. Vegetation composition needed a slightly longer time (2 yr) to recover than that without resmoothing. We thus recommend the application of manual resmoothing in hay meadows with high short-term resilience to rooting, but a risk of long-term degradation (e.g., shrub encroachment) if mowing is not resumed. In hay meadows with lower resilience (because of, e.g., steep slopes), resmoothing should be applied with caution and may be supplemented with seeding to support the recovery of the vegetation and prevent soil erosion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"100 ","pages":"Pages 126-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742425000314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a widespread megaherbivore that can intensively disturb large areas of its habitat both in its native and non-native ranges, when populations reach high densities. The main problem is its rooting habit, which entails intensive disturbance of the topsoil and herbaceous layer. The extent of concomitant habitat degradation varies across ecoregions; some ecosystems are rather resilient, although the damages are long-lasting in others. In mown meadows, a secondary problem is the inability to resume mowing due to the uneven soil surface of rooted patches. This can lead to both economic loss and a loss of management-dependent biodiversity. We assessed the short-term effects of rooting on vegetation cover and composition in central European permanent hay meadows and tested the utility of manual soil surface resmoothing to enable the continuation of mowing. We found that rooting increased bare soil surface but vegetation recovery occurred within a year. Similarly, high resilience was found for species composition. We could not detect any difference between rooted and intact grassland patches after 1 yr. This short-term perturbation of the composition could be associated with a temporary decrease in grassland specialist species and an increase in ruderal and pioneer species. Soil surface resmoothing was an additional disturbance, but vegetation cover returned to the level of intact grasslands within a year. Vegetation composition needed a slightly longer time (2 yr) to recover than that without resmoothing. We thus recommend the application of manual resmoothing in hay meadows with high short-term resilience to rooting, but a risk of long-term degradation (e.g., shrub encroachment) if mowing is not resumed. In hay meadows with lower resilience (because of, e.g., steep slopes), resmoothing should be applied with caution and may be supplemented with seeding to support the recovery of the vegetation and prevent soil erosion.
在野猪生根后手动清除土壤,可以在不妨碍植被恢复的情况下恢复干草草地的刈割管理
野猪(Sus scrofa)是一种分布广泛的大型食草动物,当种群达到高密度时,它可以强烈地扰乱其栖息地的大片区域,无论是在其本地还是非本地范围内。主要问题是它的生根习惯,这需要对表土和草本层进行强烈的干扰。生境退化的程度因生态区域而异;一些生态系统相当有弹性,尽管对另一些生态系统的损害是持久的。在修剪过的草地上,第二个问题是由于根系斑块的土壤表面不均匀而无法恢复修剪。这可能导致经济损失和依赖管理的生物多样性的损失。我们评估了根系对中欧永久干草草甸植被覆盖和组成的短期影响,并测试了人工土壤表面平整的效用,以使割草能够继续进行。结果表明,生根增加了裸露土壤表面,但植被在一年内恢复。同样,物种组成具有较高的弹性。1年后,我们没有发现有根的草地斑块和完整的草地斑块之间有任何差异。这种短期的组成扰动可能与草地专科物种的暂时减少和原始物种和先锋物种的增加有关。土壤表面平滑是一个额外的干扰,但植被覆盖在一年内恢复到完整草地的水平。植被组成恢复所需的时间(2年)略长于未进行平滑处理的植被组成恢复时间。因此,我们建议对短期根系恢复能力高,但如果不恢复刈割,则有长期退化(如灌木侵占)的风险的干草草地进行人工刈割。在恢复力较低的干草草地上(例如,由于陡峭的斜坡),应谨慎地进行清除,并可辅以播种,以支持植被的恢复和防止土壤侵蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信