Interpretable machine learning and graph attention network based model for predicting PAMPA permeability

IF 2.7 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Upashya Parasar , Orchid Baruah , Debasish Saikia , Pankaj Bharali , Hridoy Jyoti Mahanta
{"title":"Interpretable machine learning and graph attention network based model for predicting PAMPA permeability","authors":"Upashya Parasar ,&nbsp;Orchid Baruah ,&nbsp;Debasish Saikia ,&nbsp;Pankaj Bharali ,&nbsp;Hridoy Jyoti Mahanta","doi":"10.1016/j.jmgm.2025.109050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) is widely used in the early phases of drug discovery as it is quite robust and offers high throughput. It serves as a platform for assessing the permeability and absorption of pharmaceutical compounds across lipid membranes. This study uses machine learning (Random forest or RF, Explainable boosting machine or EBM and Adaboost) and deep learning (Graph attention network or GAT) to build models to predict PAMPA permeability. A curated dataset of 5447 compounds with PAMPA permeability scores (in a scale 10<sup>−6</sup> cm/s) was used to train and validate these models. During validation it was observed that, RF and EBM models could predict with an accuracy of 81 % and 80 % respectively, whereas with Adaboost and GAT, the accuracies were limited 76 % and 74 % respectively. Further, an external dataset was used to screen the predictive capability of these models and results showed that RF, EBM and Adaboost had quite similar accuracies with 91 %, 90 % and 89 % respectively. Interestingly, with this external dataset, the GAT-based model also reached a significant accuracy of 86 %. The overall results show that all the models in this study could well predict PAMPA permeability over the benchmark and covering diverse chemical space. All the datasets and codes for developing these models have been deposited on the GitHub platform (<span><span>https://github.com/hridoy69/pampa_premeability</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular graphics & modelling","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 109050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular graphics & modelling","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109332632500110X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) is widely used in the early phases of drug discovery as it is quite robust and offers high throughput. It serves as a platform for assessing the permeability and absorption of pharmaceutical compounds across lipid membranes. This study uses machine learning (Random forest or RF, Explainable boosting machine or EBM and Adaboost) and deep learning (Graph attention network or GAT) to build models to predict PAMPA permeability. A curated dataset of 5447 compounds with PAMPA permeability scores (in a scale 10−6 cm/s) was used to train and validate these models. During validation it was observed that, RF and EBM models could predict with an accuracy of 81 % and 80 % respectively, whereas with Adaboost and GAT, the accuracies were limited 76 % and 74 % respectively. Further, an external dataset was used to screen the predictive capability of these models and results showed that RF, EBM and Adaboost had quite similar accuracies with 91 %, 90 % and 89 % respectively. Interestingly, with this external dataset, the GAT-based model also reached a significant accuracy of 86 %. The overall results show that all the models in this study could well predict PAMPA permeability over the benchmark and covering diverse chemical space. All the datasets and codes for developing these models have been deposited on the GitHub platform (https://github.com/hridoy69/pampa_premeability).

Abstract Image

基于可解释机器学习和图注意网络的PAMPA渗透率预测模型
平行人工膜透性测定(PAMPA)因其具有很强的鲁棒性和高通量而广泛应用于药物发现的早期阶段。它作为一个评估药物化合物在脂质膜上的渗透性和吸收的平台。本研究使用机器学习(Random forest或RF, Explainable boosting machine或EBM和Adaboost)和深度学习(Graph attention network或GAT)建立模型来预测PAMPA渗透率。使用5447种具有PAMPA渗透性评分(尺度为10 - 6 cm/s)的化合物的精心整理的数据集来训练和验证这些模型。在验证过程中,观察到RF和EBM模型的预测准确率分别为81%和80%,而Adaboost和GAT模型的预测准确率分别为76%和74%。此外,使用外部数据集筛选这些模型的预测能力,结果显示RF, EBM和Adaboost具有非常相似的准确性,分别为91%,90%和89%。有趣的是,使用这个外部数据集,基于gat的模型也达到了86%的显著准确率。总体结果表明,本研究中所有模型均能较好地预测PAMPA渗透率,且覆盖了不同的化学空间。所有用于开发这些模型的数据集和代码都已经存放在GitHub平台上(https://github.com/hridoy69/pampa_premeability)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of molecular graphics & modelling
Journal of molecular graphics & modelling 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
216
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling is devoted to the publication of papers on the uses of computers in theoretical investigations of molecular structure, function, interaction, and design. The scope of the journal includes all aspects of molecular modeling and computational chemistry, including, for instance, the study of molecular shape and properties, molecular simulations, protein and polymer engineering, drug design, materials design, structure-activity and structure-property relationships, database mining, and compound library design. As a primary research journal, JMGM seeks to bring new knowledge to the attention of our readers. As such, submissions to the journal need to not only report results, but must draw conclusions and explore implications of the work presented. Authors are strongly encouraged to bear this in mind when preparing manuscripts. Routine applications of standard modelling approaches, providing only very limited new scientific insight, will not meet our criteria for publication. Reproducibility of reported calculations is an important issue. Wherever possible, we urge authors to enhance their papers with Supplementary Data, for example, in QSAR studies machine-readable versions of molecular datasets or in the development of new force-field parameters versions of the topology and force field parameter files. Routine applications of existing methods that do not lead to genuinely new insight will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信