Zambia's Agricultural Input Support Programme: Estimating the Impact of the Voucher Delivery System on Crop Diversification

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Obrian Ndhlovu, Edwin Muchapondwa
{"title":"Zambia's Agricultural Input Support Programme: Estimating the Impact of the Voucher Delivery System on Crop Diversification","authors":"Obrian Ndhlovu,&nbsp;Edwin Muchapondwa","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zambia runs an agricultural input support program for 900,000 rural households, primarily targeting maize, the staple crop. A new delivery mode was introduced to the program, initially allowing farmers in 16 of the 115 districts to choose inputs using electronic vouchers, with the aim of encouraging crop diversification, amongst other objectives. Despite the potential benefits of this reform from a theoretical perspective, farmers may not always be able to diversify their crops due to existing barriers. In this paper, we examine how the electronic voucher reform impacted crop diversification and rotation practices at the household level during the pilot phase. The paper combines data from surveys conducted over two waves with 1518 rural households, high-resolution satellite rainfall data and in-depth qualitative interviews with 23 key informants. We find evidence that the reform had a positive impact (an increase of 0.231 points on the Simpson index of diversification) on crop diversification. However, there is no significant direct impact on crop rotation. We nevertheless observed that crop rotation can gain impetus only if farmers fully embrace crop diversification. Results from the qualitative interviews suggest that the limited effectiveness of electronic vouchers could be due to inadequacies in private sector input and output markets, as well as cultural preferences. Several important policy implications arise from these findings, including the need to promote markets for alternative crops and enhance extension services.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 2","pages":"405-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zambia runs an agricultural input support program for 900,000 rural households, primarily targeting maize, the staple crop. A new delivery mode was introduced to the program, initially allowing farmers in 16 of the 115 districts to choose inputs using electronic vouchers, with the aim of encouraging crop diversification, amongst other objectives. Despite the potential benefits of this reform from a theoretical perspective, farmers may not always be able to diversify their crops due to existing barriers. In this paper, we examine how the electronic voucher reform impacted crop diversification and rotation practices at the household level during the pilot phase. The paper combines data from surveys conducted over two waves with 1518 rural households, high-resolution satellite rainfall data and in-depth qualitative interviews with 23 key informants. We find evidence that the reform had a positive impact (an increase of 0.231 points on the Simpson index of diversification) on crop diversification. However, there is no significant direct impact on crop rotation. We nevertheless observed that crop rotation can gain impetus only if farmers fully embrace crop diversification. Results from the qualitative interviews suggest that the limited effectiveness of electronic vouchers could be due to inadequacies in private sector input and output markets, as well as cultural preferences. Several important policy implications arise from these findings, including the need to promote markets for alternative crops and enhance extension services.

Abstract Image

赞比亚为 90 万农村家庭实施了一项农业投入支持计划,主要针对主要作物玉米。该计划引入了一种新的交付模式,最初允许 115 个地区中 16 个地区的农民使用电子凭证选择投入品,目的之一是鼓励作物多样化。尽管从理论角度看,这项改革具有潜在益处,但由于现有障碍,农民可能并不总能实现作物多样化。在本文中,我们研究了电子购粮券改革在试点阶段如何影响家庭层面的作物多样化和轮作实践。本文结合了对 1518 个农村家庭进行的两波调查数据、高分辨率卫星降雨数据以及对 23 位关键信息提供者的深入定性访谈。我们发现有证据表明,改革对作物多样化产生了积极影响(辛普森多样化指数增加了 0.231 点)。然而,改革对轮作没有直接的重大影响。不过,我们注意到,只有当农民完全接受作物多样化时,轮作才能获得动力。定性访谈的结果表明,电子代金券的效果有限可能是由于私营部门投入和产出市场的不足以及文化偏好造成的。这些研究结果产生了一些重要的政策影响,包括需要促进替代作物市场和加强推广服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信