Allopurinol-Induced Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Shirin Borjikhani, Sholeh Ebrahimpour, Mehdi Mohammadi
{"title":"Allopurinol-Induced Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series","authors":"Shirin Borjikhani,&nbsp;Sholeh Ebrahimpour,&nbsp;Mehdi Mohammadi","doi":"10.1155/dth/6527730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Allopurinol is a known cause of mucocutaneous adverse drug reactions, including Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize the clinical presentation, identify risk factors, and evaluate the best treatment strategies for allopurinol-induced severe skin reactions.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify English case reports and case series of allopurinol-induced Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Animal studies, reviews, book chapters, randomized and nonrandomized human studies, observational studies, and conference abstracts were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists were used to assess the quality of the included studies.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Forty-seven case reports and 21 case series were included in the analysis, which reported 91 individual patient datasets. The reaction occurred after a median of 16 days (8.5 days in those with prior reactions to allopurinol). Rapid dose escalation was observed in half of the patients (21 of 43) for whom dose-increment schedules were reported. Mucosal involvement was observed in 72 (90.0%) patients. Corticosteroids, IVIG, cyclosporine, and plasma exchange were the most common treatment modalities. Twenty-one patients (23.6%) died, and 68 (76.4%) were discharged.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although gout is 2–3 times more common in men, the numbers of cases were similar in both sexes, likely due to higher reporting rates in women. Rapid dose escalation is a risk factor for the occurrence of severe skin reactions. Corticosteroids, IVIG, and plasma exchange appear to be reasonable treatment options.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/6527730","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/6527730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allopurinol is a known cause of mucocutaneous adverse drug reactions, including Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize the clinical presentation, identify risk factors, and evaluate the best treatment strategies for allopurinol-induced severe skin reactions.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify English case reports and case series of allopurinol-induced Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Animal studies, reviews, book chapters, randomized and nonrandomized human studies, observational studies, and conference abstracts were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists were used to assess the quality of the included studies.

Results: Forty-seven case reports and 21 case series were included in the analysis, which reported 91 individual patient datasets. The reaction occurred after a median of 16 days (8.5 days in those with prior reactions to allopurinol). Rapid dose escalation was observed in half of the patients (21 of 43) for whom dose-increment schedules were reported. Mucosal involvement was observed in 72 (90.0%) patients. Corticosteroids, IVIG, cyclosporine, and plasma exchange were the most common treatment modalities. Twenty-one patients (23.6%) died, and 68 (76.4%) were discharged.

Conclusion: Although gout is 2–3 times more common in men, the numbers of cases were similar in both sexes, likely due to higher reporting rates in women. Rapid dose escalation is a risk factor for the occurrence of severe skin reactions. Corticosteroids, IVIG, and plasma exchange appear to be reasonable treatment options.

Abstract Image

别嘌呤醇诱导的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解:病例报告和病例系列的系统回顾
背景:众所周知,别嘌醇是导致皮肤粘膜不良药物反应的原因之一,包括史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死。本系统综述旨在描述别嘌呤醇引起的严重皮肤反应的临床表现特征、识别风险因素并评估最佳治疗策略。 研究方法系统检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库,以确定别嘌呤醇诱发史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死症的英文病例报告和系列病例。排除了动物研究、综述、书籍章节、随机和非随机人体研究、观察性研究和会议摘要。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)的批判性评估核对表来评估纳入研究的质量。 结果:分析共纳入 47 篇病例报告和 21 篇系列病例,报告了 91 个患者数据集。反应发生的时间中位数为 16 天(曾对别嘌呤醇发生过反应的患者为 8.5 天)。在报告了剂量增加时间表的患者中,有一半(43 例中的 21 例)出现了快速剂量增加。在 72 例(90.0%)患者中观察到粘膜受累。皮质类固醇、IVIG、环孢素和血浆置换是最常见的治疗方法。21名患者(23.6%)死亡,68名患者(76.4%)出院。 结论虽然痛风在男性中的发病率是女性的2-3倍,但男女患者的病例数却相差无几,这可能是因为女性的报告率较高。快速增加剂量是发生严重皮肤反应的一个风险因素。皮质类固醇、IVIG和血浆置换似乎是合理的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Therapy
Dermatologic Therapy 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信