Can Community-Based Payments Contribute to a More Equitable Distribution of Farm Income?

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Atomu Nitta
{"title":"Can Community-Based Payments Contribute to a More Equitable Distribution of Farm Income?","authors":"Atomu Nitta","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study assesses the impact of community-based payments on farm income inequality and the distribution of these across farm sizes, compared to individual-based payments, using Gini decomposition by income source and the pseudo-Gini coefficient. It uses a sample of Japanese paddy farms, which is suitable for an empirical comparison of the distribution and the distributional impact of community-based and individual-based payments. The empirical results show that the community-based payments do not favour farms with higher farm incomes compared to individual-based payments and are equally distributed across farm sizes. The findings suggest that the community-based payment scheme can contribute to a more equitable distribution of farm income by ensuring a more equitable distribution of direct payments across farm sizes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 2","pages":"330-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of community-based payments on farm income inequality and the distribution of these across farm sizes, compared to individual-based payments, using Gini decomposition by income source and the pseudo-Gini coefficient. It uses a sample of Japanese paddy farms, which is suitable for an empirical comparison of the distribution and the distributional impact of community-based and individual-based payments. The empirical results show that the community-based payments do not favour farms with higher farm incomes compared to individual-based payments and are equally distributed across farm sizes. The findings suggest that the community-based payment scheme can contribute to a more equitable distribution of farm income by ensuring a more equitable distribution of direct payments across farm sizes.

以社区为基础的支付能促进更公平的农业收入分配吗?
本研究采用收入来源的基尼分解法和伪基尼系数,评估了与基于个人的支付相比,基于社区的支付对农场收入不平等的影响及其在不同规模农场之间的分布情况。研究使用了日本水稻农场的样本,该样本适合对社区支付和个人支付的分布和分布影响进行实证比较。实证结果表明,与基于个人的支付相比,基于社区的支付并不偏向于农业收入较高的农场,而是在不同规模的农场之间平均分配。研究结果表明,以社区为基础的付款计划可以通过确保直接付款在不同规模的农场之间更公平的分配,促进农场收入更公平的分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信