John Newton Darroch, 1930–2024

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Gary Glonek
{"title":"John Newton Darroch, 1930–2024","authors":"Gary Glonek","doi":"10.1111/anzs.12430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>John Darroch was born in England in Melksham, Wiltshire, to George Darroch and Phyllis Lacey on 22 October 1930 and died, aged 93 years, on 15 April 2024.</p><p>He attended grammar school where he excelled in the classroom and at sports, and subsequently gained admission to study civil engineering at the University of Bristol. Recognising his talent, his mathematics teacher persuaded him to postpone university and take the exam for the Cambridge Open Scholarship to study mathematics.</p><p>John was successful and studied for 4 years, specialising in theoretical physics and completing the Diploma in Mathematical Statistics under the supervision of Dennis Lindley. He studied briefly with R.A. Fisher in this time, although this appears not to have been a significant factor in his future career choices. It was also there that he met his future wife, Elisabeth Pennington. He completed 2 years of national service in the RAF, at the rank of Pilot Officer, teaching mathematics, and in 1955 he and Elisabeth set sail for Cape Town to take up his new position as a lecturer at the University.</p><p>John arrived at the University of Cape Town ‘with no thought of doing any research’. Within a few months, an enquiry from the professor of biology awakened his instinct for research, culminating in his 1958 <i>Biometrika</i> paper on capture-recapture experiments. He enrolled in a Ph.D. by Publication program at Cape Town, and was subsequently awarded the degree on the basis of his series of three <i>Biometrika</i> papers on capture-recapture (Darroch <span>1958</span>, <span>1959</span>, <span>1961</span>). This seminal contribution proposed models and provided maximum likelihood estimates for a number of capture-recapture settings, and provided a basis for much of the development that followed. It was through this work, undertaken without supervision and with only rudimentary access to the literature, that John developed his first-principles approach to research.</p><p>John's academic career flourished. He and Elisabeth returned to England to take up a lectureship at the University of Manchester, where he supervised George Seber for a period introducing him to a problem in capture-recapture. Keen to escape the cold winters, John and his young family moved to Adelaide where he took up a senior lectureship at the University of Adelaide. This was followed by a position at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, but John and his family were drawn back to Adelaide. In 1966 he was offered and accepted the Inaugural Chair in Statistics at Flinders University, a position he held until his retirement in 1996.</p><p>John is best known for his contributions to statistical methodology, especially in the area of multivariate categorical data. His work was recognised in 2005 through the award of the SSA Pitman Medal. Writing in support of the award, Stephen Fienberg observed: <i>Someone once remarked to me that there are few statisticians who have a major new idea that could be said to influence the development of our field. Clearly John Darroch has had at least four such breakthrough ideas in the area of categorical data alone. But he has also worked on other important problems in statistics (e.g., canonical correlations) and its application (e.g., statistics and the law). John has thought clearly and wisely about a diverse collection of problems and has had a truly major impact on the field of statistics</i>.</p><p>John's interest in categorical data, commencing with his 1962 paper on interactions in multi-factor contingency tables (Darroch <span>1962</span>), spanned several decades and resulted in many important contributions. This included the development of the generalised iterative proportional scaling algorithm jointly with Douglas Ratcliff (Darroch &amp; Ratcliff <span>1972</span>), which, with its generalisations, continues to find applications because of its simplicity and convergence properties. His joint work with Terry Speed and Steffen Lauritzen on Markov fields and log-linear interactions for contingency tables (Darroch, Lauritzen &amp; Speed <span>1980</span>) was a landmark in the development of models for categorical data and set the stage for a broader class of graphical models that revolutionised Bayesian statistics. It is interesting to note that John had separately developed some of these ideas a few years earlier, but that work was never published. Similarly, John was a pioneer of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, developing Markov Chains based on a very simple neighbourhood structure to estimate exact P-values in contingency table analysis. This work was presented in various seminars but also not published.</p><p>John's other widely recognised work is in the area of quasi-stationarity distributions for absorbing Markov processes. Together with Eugene Seneta, he made ground-breaking advances to the theory (Darroch &amp; Seneta <span>1965</span>, <span>1967</span>).</p><p>In addition to the major contributions highlighted above, John's productive research career resulted in a number of other insightful papers on a range of topics on statistical methodology. Throughout this body of work, a number of themes are apparent.</p><p>First, his insights were often highly original, elegant and relevant. This is, no doubt, attributable in part to the intellectual independence arising from his early experience at Cape Town. From working in virtual isolation, John recognised the advantage of not being constrained by the thoughts of others and carried this forward in his future work. When considering a new research topic, he would deliberately not read the existing literature until he had ‘thought long and hard about the problem’.</p><p>Second, although John was a highly capable mathematician in his own right, he valued conceptual insight above mathematical technicality. His intuition was such that by choosing the right concept, the mathematical justification would typically follow. He thought critically about his own ideas and was not seduced by the apparent elegance of a concept without rigorous justification. As such, his research was typically an ideal blend of creativity, conceptual clarity and mathematical rigour.</p><p>Finally, John's methodological research covered a diverse range of topics but a common strand through much of this work was his interest with dependence among variates: that is, the genesis and interpretation of complex relationships, how such relationships can be represented in models and methods of inference. He thought deeply on these problems and developed a sophisticated view that properly accounted for the multiple sources of dependence that will typically be present in any observable association.</p><p>John's interests and influence extended beyond academic publishing; of particular note is his involvement in the Splatt Royal Commission in 1983. The subject of the Royal Commission was to enquire into the murder conviction of Edward Splatt in 1978, and John assisted the Commission defence barrister with the statistical aspects of the case. He identified serious flaws in the logic of the prosecution arguments that he articulated by applying probabilistic logic and Bayes' theorem. The report of the Royal Commission indicated acceptance of his arguments and also overturned the conviction of Edward Splatt. The Splatt Royal Commission became the subject of John's presidential address to the Statistical Society of Australia. The text appeared in the February 1985 SSAI newsletter and a version was later published in the <i>Professional Statistician</i> (Darroch <span>1987</span>). John was subsequently introduced by Terry Speed to Sir Richard Eggleston, an eminent judge, Chancellor of Monash University and author of the book ‘Evidence, proof and probability’. John greatly valued the ensuing interaction that involved extensive correspondence and resulted in papers at two international conferences.</p><p>Although best known for his research, John made many important contributions to the profession, most notably, his contribution to statistical education. His initial appointment at the University of Cape Town was as their first ever lecturer in probability and statistics and it was his role to introduce that material to the curriculum. When he arrived at the University of Adelaide 7 years later, there was a single statistics subject available. Within a few months, John introduced a second offering in mathematical statistics at third year and a fourth-year subject on Markov Chains. Both subjects were an innovative synthesis of the most up-to-date material available at the time. These subjects inspired Eugene Seneta to further study with John, leading eventually to their previously mentioned work on quasi-stationary distributions. In his role as the Inaugural Chair in Statistics at Flinders University, John was responsible for the design and implementation of the statistics program. At its zenith, the program made available a comprehensive range of subjects up to honours level to a generation of statisticians. The program encompassed many of the recent developments of the time, and of particular note was the treatment of linear statistical models in terms of coordinate-free geometry. John worked hard for many years to maintain the program against the tide of declining enrolments. He recognised the need to establish a service teaching role for the discipline, a task made even more difficult by the inexplicable opposition from the then Head of Mathematical Sciences. Supervision of graduate students was also a great source of satisfaction to John over his career. He was a role model, mentor and friend to his students, many of whom progressed to highly successful careers.</p><p></p><p>John at his desk in his Flinders University office, May 1995. <i>Source</i>: unknown</p><p>John contributed to the profession more broadly and held, at various times, the positions of the SA Branch President and national President of the Statistical Society of Australia and President of the International Biometric Society, Australasian Region. Within the University, he contributed in a number of roles, including as the Head of the School of Mathematical Sciences. In an environment at times driven by ego, he brought much needed reason and civility through his unimpeachable courtesy and steadfast adherence to principle.</p><p>Beyond his professional life, John had wide and varied interests. He enjoyed many physical activities. He maintained his involvement in hockey and athletics from his early years at school until his move to Cape Town, where they were replaced with hiking on Table Mountain and swimming and body-surfing. These were replaced over the years by tennis, sailing, gliding, hang-gliding and wind-surfing. He had a lifelong love of music, literature and travel. Pottery was another of his long-term hobbies and he took great pleasure in sharing his carefully made pieces with friends and family.</p><p>All who knew John would attest to his modest, unassuming and impeccably polite manner. He was articulate and could hold conversation on a wide range of topics. He genuinely enjoyed interaction with people from all walks of life. In the days before outsourcing, it was standard practice for tradespeople employed by the University to take their tea breaks in whichever tea room was nearby their worksite. John came to know many of them well and it was common to see him speaking to them with the same level of interest and engagement as he did with his academic colleagues.</p><p>John's colleagues, students and visitors will remember his family home in the Adelaide foothills at Glen Osmond. John and Elisabeth would from time to time entertain various groups, and many memorable evenings were spent overlooking a spectacular view of the city. Many of John's colleagues and collaborators also became his lifelong friends. Academic visitors would often stay with him and Elisabeth when in Adelaide. For many years following their retirement, John and his close friends from Flinders University, Miloslav Jiřina, Jerry Kautsky and Ananth Rao, formed the nucleus of a small group of former colleagues who would meet each month for lunch.</p><p>When he retired in 1996, John decided to make a clean break from statistics. He gave away all of his books and journals and eschewed the suggestion of an emeritus appointment at the University. He and Elisabeth spent the next few years travelling, visiting families and friends and indulging their love of the arts. Sadly, Elisabeth was diagnosed with cancer early in 2000 and passed away later that year. Unfortunately, this was not the first loss suffered by John and his family, having been devastated by the death of his oldest son, Alastair, in an accident in 1981. John's children Richard and Helen were a great source of comfort following Elisabeth's death.</p><p>Fortuitously, John met Gloria Acton in 2002 at a meeting of the Jung Society and they married the following year. John and Gloria shared many interests and were clearly devoted to each other and their families. They spent many happy years travelling together, visiting family and enjoying music, opera and literature until his health made it no longer possible.</p><p>John is remembered with great affection and enormous respect by those fortunate enough to have known him. His modest and unassuming nature belies a lifetime of outstanding contribution and influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55428,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","volume":"67 1","pages":"130-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anzs.12430","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anzs.12430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

John Darroch was born in England in Melksham, Wiltshire, to George Darroch and Phyllis Lacey on 22 October 1930 and died, aged 93 years, on 15 April 2024.

He attended grammar school where he excelled in the classroom and at sports, and subsequently gained admission to study civil engineering at the University of Bristol. Recognising his talent, his mathematics teacher persuaded him to postpone university and take the exam for the Cambridge Open Scholarship to study mathematics.

John was successful and studied for 4 years, specialising in theoretical physics and completing the Diploma in Mathematical Statistics under the supervision of Dennis Lindley. He studied briefly with R.A. Fisher in this time, although this appears not to have been a significant factor in his future career choices. It was also there that he met his future wife, Elisabeth Pennington. He completed 2 years of national service in the RAF, at the rank of Pilot Officer, teaching mathematics, and in 1955 he and Elisabeth set sail for Cape Town to take up his new position as a lecturer at the University.

John arrived at the University of Cape Town ‘with no thought of doing any research’. Within a few months, an enquiry from the professor of biology awakened his instinct for research, culminating in his 1958 Biometrika paper on capture-recapture experiments. He enrolled in a Ph.D. by Publication program at Cape Town, and was subsequently awarded the degree on the basis of his series of three Biometrika papers on capture-recapture (Darroch 1958, 1959, 1961). This seminal contribution proposed models and provided maximum likelihood estimates for a number of capture-recapture settings, and provided a basis for much of the development that followed. It was through this work, undertaken without supervision and with only rudimentary access to the literature, that John developed his first-principles approach to research.

John's academic career flourished. He and Elisabeth returned to England to take up a lectureship at the University of Manchester, where he supervised George Seber for a period introducing him to a problem in capture-recapture. Keen to escape the cold winters, John and his young family moved to Adelaide where he took up a senior lectureship at the University of Adelaide. This was followed by a position at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, but John and his family were drawn back to Adelaide. In 1966 he was offered and accepted the Inaugural Chair in Statistics at Flinders University, a position he held until his retirement in 1996.

John is best known for his contributions to statistical methodology, especially in the area of multivariate categorical data. His work was recognised in 2005 through the award of the SSA Pitman Medal. Writing in support of the award, Stephen Fienberg observed: Someone once remarked to me that there are few statisticians who have a major new idea that could be said to influence the development of our field. Clearly John Darroch has had at least four such breakthrough ideas in the area of categorical data alone. But he has also worked on other important problems in statistics (e.g., canonical correlations) and its application (e.g., statistics and the law). John has thought clearly and wisely about a diverse collection of problems and has had a truly major impact on the field of statistics.

John's interest in categorical data, commencing with his 1962 paper on interactions in multi-factor contingency tables (Darroch 1962), spanned several decades and resulted in many important contributions. This included the development of the generalised iterative proportional scaling algorithm jointly with Douglas Ratcliff (Darroch & Ratcliff 1972), which, with its generalisations, continues to find applications because of its simplicity and convergence properties. His joint work with Terry Speed and Steffen Lauritzen on Markov fields and log-linear interactions for contingency tables (Darroch, Lauritzen & Speed 1980) was a landmark in the development of models for categorical data and set the stage for a broader class of graphical models that revolutionised Bayesian statistics. It is interesting to note that John had separately developed some of these ideas a few years earlier, but that work was never published. Similarly, John was a pioneer of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, developing Markov Chains based on a very simple neighbourhood structure to estimate exact P-values in contingency table analysis. This work was presented in various seminars but also not published.

John's other widely recognised work is in the area of quasi-stationarity distributions for absorbing Markov processes. Together with Eugene Seneta, he made ground-breaking advances to the theory (Darroch & Seneta 1965, 1967).

In addition to the major contributions highlighted above, John's productive research career resulted in a number of other insightful papers on a range of topics on statistical methodology. Throughout this body of work, a number of themes are apparent.

First, his insights were often highly original, elegant and relevant. This is, no doubt, attributable in part to the intellectual independence arising from his early experience at Cape Town. From working in virtual isolation, John recognised the advantage of not being constrained by the thoughts of others and carried this forward in his future work. When considering a new research topic, he would deliberately not read the existing literature until he had ‘thought long and hard about the problem’.

Second, although John was a highly capable mathematician in his own right, he valued conceptual insight above mathematical technicality. His intuition was such that by choosing the right concept, the mathematical justification would typically follow. He thought critically about his own ideas and was not seduced by the apparent elegance of a concept without rigorous justification. As such, his research was typically an ideal blend of creativity, conceptual clarity and mathematical rigour.

Finally, John's methodological research covered a diverse range of topics but a common strand through much of this work was his interest with dependence among variates: that is, the genesis and interpretation of complex relationships, how such relationships can be represented in models and methods of inference. He thought deeply on these problems and developed a sophisticated view that properly accounted for the multiple sources of dependence that will typically be present in any observable association.

John's interests and influence extended beyond academic publishing; of particular note is his involvement in the Splatt Royal Commission in 1983. The subject of the Royal Commission was to enquire into the murder conviction of Edward Splatt in 1978, and John assisted the Commission defence barrister with the statistical aspects of the case. He identified serious flaws in the logic of the prosecution arguments that he articulated by applying probabilistic logic and Bayes' theorem. The report of the Royal Commission indicated acceptance of his arguments and also overturned the conviction of Edward Splatt. The Splatt Royal Commission became the subject of John's presidential address to the Statistical Society of Australia. The text appeared in the February 1985 SSAI newsletter and a version was later published in the Professional Statistician (Darroch 1987). John was subsequently introduced by Terry Speed to Sir Richard Eggleston, an eminent judge, Chancellor of Monash University and author of the book ‘Evidence, proof and probability’. John greatly valued the ensuing interaction that involved extensive correspondence and resulted in papers at two international conferences.

Although best known for his research, John made many important contributions to the profession, most notably, his contribution to statistical education. His initial appointment at the University of Cape Town was as their first ever lecturer in probability and statistics and it was his role to introduce that material to the curriculum. When he arrived at the University of Adelaide 7 years later, there was a single statistics subject available. Within a few months, John introduced a second offering in mathematical statistics at third year and a fourth-year subject on Markov Chains. Both subjects were an innovative synthesis of the most up-to-date material available at the time. These subjects inspired Eugene Seneta to further study with John, leading eventually to their previously mentioned work on quasi-stationary distributions. In his role as the Inaugural Chair in Statistics at Flinders University, John was responsible for the design and implementation of the statistics program. At its zenith, the program made available a comprehensive range of subjects up to honours level to a generation of statisticians. The program encompassed many of the recent developments of the time, and of particular note was the treatment of linear statistical models in terms of coordinate-free geometry. John worked hard for many years to maintain the program against the tide of declining enrolments. He recognised the need to establish a service teaching role for the discipline, a task made even more difficult by the inexplicable opposition from the then Head of Mathematical Sciences. Supervision of graduate students was also a great source of satisfaction to John over his career. He was a role model, mentor and friend to his students, many of whom progressed to highly successful careers.

John at his desk in his Flinders University office, May 1995. Source: unknown

John contributed to the profession more broadly and held, at various times, the positions of the SA Branch President and national President of the Statistical Society of Australia and President of the International Biometric Society, Australasian Region. Within the University, he contributed in a number of roles, including as the Head of the School of Mathematical Sciences. In an environment at times driven by ego, he brought much needed reason and civility through his unimpeachable courtesy and steadfast adherence to principle.

Beyond his professional life, John had wide and varied interests. He enjoyed many physical activities. He maintained his involvement in hockey and athletics from his early years at school until his move to Cape Town, where they were replaced with hiking on Table Mountain and swimming and body-surfing. These were replaced over the years by tennis, sailing, gliding, hang-gliding and wind-surfing. He had a lifelong love of music, literature and travel. Pottery was another of his long-term hobbies and he took great pleasure in sharing his carefully made pieces with friends and family.

All who knew John would attest to his modest, unassuming and impeccably polite manner. He was articulate and could hold conversation on a wide range of topics. He genuinely enjoyed interaction with people from all walks of life. In the days before outsourcing, it was standard practice for tradespeople employed by the University to take their tea breaks in whichever tea room was nearby their worksite. John came to know many of them well and it was common to see him speaking to them with the same level of interest and engagement as he did with his academic colleagues.

John's colleagues, students and visitors will remember his family home in the Adelaide foothills at Glen Osmond. John and Elisabeth would from time to time entertain various groups, and many memorable evenings were spent overlooking a spectacular view of the city. Many of John's colleagues and collaborators also became his lifelong friends. Academic visitors would often stay with him and Elisabeth when in Adelaide. For many years following their retirement, John and his close friends from Flinders University, Miloslav Jiřina, Jerry Kautsky and Ananth Rao, formed the nucleus of a small group of former colleagues who would meet each month for lunch.

When he retired in 1996, John decided to make a clean break from statistics. He gave away all of his books and journals and eschewed the suggestion of an emeritus appointment at the University. He and Elisabeth spent the next few years travelling, visiting families and friends and indulging their love of the arts. Sadly, Elisabeth was diagnosed with cancer early in 2000 and passed away later that year. Unfortunately, this was not the first loss suffered by John and his family, having been devastated by the death of his oldest son, Alastair, in an accident in 1981. John's children Richard and Helen were a great source of comfort following Elisabeth's death.

Fortuitously, John met Gloria Acton in 2002 at a meeting of the Jung Society and they married the following year. John and Gloria shared many interests and were clearly devoted to each other and their families. They spent many happy years travelling together, visiting family and enjoying music, opera and literature until his health made it no longer possible.

John is remembered with great affection and enormous respect by those fortunate enough to have known him. His modest and unassuming nature belies a lifetime of outstanding contribution and influence.

约翰·牛顿·达罗克(1930-2024
首先,他的见解往往具有高度的原创性、优雅性和相关性。毫无疑问,这部分归功于他早年在开普敦的经历所带来的思想独立性。在几乎与世隔绝的环境中工作,约翰认识到了不受他人思想束缚的优势,并在今后的工作中将这种优势发扬光大。其次,虽然约翰本身是一位能力很强的数学家,但他更看重概念上的洞察力,而不是数学上的技术性。他的直觉告诉他,只要选择了正确的概念,数学理由通常就会随之而来。他对自己的想法进行批判性思考,不会被没有严密论证的概念的表面优雅所迷惑。最后,约翰的方法论研究涵盖了各种各样的主题,但贯穿其中的一个共同点是他对变量间依赖关系的兴趣:即复杂关系的起源和解释,如何在模型和推理方法中体现这些关系。他对这些问题进行了深入的思考,并提出了一个复杂的观点,该观点正确地解释了在任何可观察到的关联中通常会存在的多种依赖性来源。约翰的兴趣和影响超出了学术出版的范围;特别值得一提的是他在 1983 年参与了斯普拉特皇家委员会的工作。皇家委员会的主题是调查 1978 年对爱德华-斯普拉特(Edward Splatt)的谋杀定罪,约翰协助委员会辩护律师处理了案件的统计方面。他通过应用概率逻辑和贝叶斯定理,找出了控方论证逻辑中的严重缺陷。皇家委员会的报告表示接受他的论点,并推翻了对爱德华-斯普拉特的定罪。斯普拉特皇家委员会成为约翰在澳大利亚统计学会发表的主席演讲的主题。演讲稿刊登在 1985 年 2 月的 SSAI 时事通讯上,后来又在《专业统计学家》上发表了一个版本(Darroch,1987 年)。随后,约翰在特里-斯比德的引荐下认识了理查德-埃格莱斯顿爵士,他是一位杰出的法官、莫纳什大学校长和《证据、证明和概率》一书的作者。约翰非常重视随后的交流,双方进行了广泛的通信,并在两次国际会议上发表了论文。虽然约翰以研究著称,但他对统计专业做出了许多重要贡献,其中最突出的是他对统计教育的贡献。他最初被任命为开普敦大学的首位概率和统计学讲师,他的职责就是将该教材引入课程。7 年后,当他来到阿德莱德大学时,该校只有一门统计学课程。几个月后,约翰在三年级开设了第二门数理统计课程,并在四年级开设了马尔可夫链课程。这两个科目都是对当时最新材料的创新综合。这些科目激发了尤金-塞内塔(Eugene Seneta)与约翰的进一步研究,最终促成了他们之前提到的准稳态分布方面的工作。约翰担任弗林德斯大学统计学就职教席期间,负责设计和实施统计学课程。在其鼎盛时期,该课程为一代统计学家提供了全面的荣誉学位课程。该课程涵盖了当时的许多最新发展,尤其值得一提的是用无坐标几何方法处理线性统计模型。约翰多年来努力工作,在入学人数不断减少的情况下维持了这一课程。他认识到有必要为该学科确立服务教学的角色,而当时的数学科学系主任莫名其妙的反对使这项任务变得更加困难。在约翰的职业生涯中,指导研究生也让他非常满意。他是学生们的楷模、良师益友,许多学生都取得了事业上的巨大成功。 1995 年 5 月,约翰在弗林德斯大学办公室的办公桌前。资料来源:不详约翰对统计专业做出了更广泛的贡献,他曾多次担任澳大利亚统计协会南澳大利亚分会主席和全国主席以及国际生物统计学会澳大拉西亚地区主席。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics is an international journal managed jointly by the Statistical Society of Australia and the New Zealand Statistical Association. Its purpose is to report significant and novel contributions in statistics, ranging across articles on statistical theory, methodology, applications and computing. The journal has a particular focus on statistical techniques that can be readily applied to real-world problems, and on application papers with an Australasian emphasis. Outstanding articles submitted to the journal may be selected as Discussion Papers, to be read at a meeting of either the Statistical Society of Australia or the New Zealand Statistical Association. The main body of the journal is divided into three sections. The Theory and Methods Section publishes papers containing original contributions to the theory and methodology of statistics, econometrics and probability, and seeks papers motivated by a real problem and which demonstrate the proposed theory or methodology in that situation. There is a strong preference for papers motivated by, and illustrated with, real data. The Applications Section publishes papers demonstrating applications of statistical techniques to problems faced by users of statistics in the sciences, government and industry. A particular focus is the application of newly developed statistical methodology to real data and the demonstration of better use of established statistical methodology in an area of application. It seeks to aid teachers of statistics by placing statistical methods in context. The Statistical Computing Section publishes papers containing new algorithms, code snippets, or software descriptions (for open source software only) which enhance the field through the application of computing. Preference is given to papers featuring publically available code and/or data, and to those motivated by statistical methods for practical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信