Climate Variability, Crop Diversification and Rural Household Welfare: Evidence From Senegal

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Adama Faye, Awudu Abdulai, Williams Ali, Georges A. Abbey
{"title":"Climate Variability, Crop Diversification and Rural Household Welfare: Evidence From Senegal","authors":"Adama Faye,&nbsp;Awudu Abdulai,&nbsp;Williams Ali,&nbsp;Georges A. Abbey","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we investigate the impacts of crop diversification on food and nutrition security as well as poverty levels among rural households, using farm-level data from Senegal. We use the marginal treatment effect (MTE) approach that not only accounts for selectivity bias from both observed and unobserved attributes but also accounts for heterogeneity in the treatment effects among farming households. The empirical results reveal that farmers with a higher propensity to adopt crop diversification gain more in terms of their food security status and poverty reduction status even under climatic shocks, compared to their lower propensity counterparts. Furthermore, the results from our policy relevant treatment effects (PRTEs) analysis reveal that policies and interventions aimed at engineering connections among farmers to improve information flow are important in the adoption of crop diversification. In particular, social interaction-oriented policies such as workshops and seminars can increase the adoption of the crop diversification strategy, which would eventually lead to improved household food and nutrition security and reduced poverty levels. The findings also suggest that leveraging crop diversification as a climate risk coping strategy can contribute to poverty alleviation and improved food security of rural farm households.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"69 2","pages":"311-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the impacts of crop diversification on food and nutrition security as well as poverty levels among rural households, using farm-level data from Senegal. We use the marginal treatment effect (MTE) approach that not only accounts for selectivity bias from both observed and unobserved attributes but also accounts for heterogeneity in the treatment effects among farming households. The empirical results reveal that farmers with a higher propensity to adopt crop diversification gain more in terms of their food security status and poverty reduction status even under climatic shocks, compared to their lower propensity counterparts. Furthermore, the results from our policy relevant treatment effects (PRTEs) analysis reveal that policies and interventions aimed at engineering connections among farmers to improve information flow are important in the adoption of crop diversification. In particular, social interaction-oriented policies such as workshops and seminars can increase the adoption of the crop diversification strategy, which would eventually lead to improved household food and nutrition security and reduced poverty levels. The findings also suggest that leveraging crop diversification as a climate risk coping strategy can contribute to poverty alleviation and improved food security of rural farm households.

Abstract Image

气候多变性、作物多样化与农村家庭福利:塞内加尔的证据
在本研究中,我们利用塞内加尔农场层面的数据,调查了作物多样化对粮食和营养安全以及农村家庭贫困水平的影响。我们使用边际处理效应(MTE)方法,该方法不仅考虑了观察到的和未观察到的属性的选择性偏差,而且还考虑了农户之间处理效果的异质性。实证结果表明,即使在气候冲击下,与倾向较低的农民相比,倾向于采用作物多样化的农民在粮食安全状况和减贫状况方面获得了更多的收益。此外,我们的政策相关处理效应(PRTEs)分析结果表明,旨在通过农民之间的工程联系来改善信息流的政策和干预措施对于采用作物多样化是重要的。特别是,面向社会的政策,如讲习班和讨论会,可以促进作物多样化战略的采用,这将最终改善家庭粮食和营养安全,减少贫穷水平。研究结果还表明,利用作物多样化作为应对气候风险的策略有助于减轻贫困,改善农村农户的粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信