Daniel M. Guidot MD MPH , Mackenzie Wood MB , Emily Poehlein MB , Scott Palmer MD MHS , Lisa McElroy MD MS FACS
{"title":"Racial disparities in lung function by pulmonary function testing among lung transplant candidates and race-specific reference equations","authors":"Daniel M. Guidot MD MPH , Mackenzie Wood MB , Emily Poehlein MB , Scott Palmer MD MHS , Lisa McElroy MD MS FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-White patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) experience racial disparities in lung transplant waitlist mortality. Race-specific equations for spirometry may contribute by underestimating restriction severity in non-White candidates. We analyzed US lung transplant candidates to assess for disparities in forced vital capacity (FVC) at listing, comparing absolute and adjusted values using race-specific and race-neutral equations. We identified 17,457 adults with ILD listed May 4, 2005 to September 31, 2023. At listing, mean absolute FVC was higher for White patients (2.03 ± 0.80<!--> <!-->liters) than Black patients (1.61 ± 0.67<!--> <!-->liters) and Asian patients (1.49 ± 0.86<!--> <!-->liters). Differences were attenuated after applying race-specific equations (White patients 50.0 ± 17.5%, Black patients 47.7 ± 17.9%, Asian patients 46.2 ± 24.2%). Compared with race-neutral equations, race-specific equations had higher odds of classifying FVC as severe (≤40%) requiring listing in White patients (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28–1.40) but lower odds in Black patients (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74–0.90). Using race-neutral equations might help improve racial disparities for lung transplant candidates with ILD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-White patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) experience racial disparities in lung transplant waitlist mortality. Race-specific equations for spirometry may contribute by underestimating restriction severity in non-White candidates. We analyzed US lung transplant candidates to assess for disparities in forced vital capacity (FVC) at listing, comparing absolute and adjusted values using race-specific and race-neutral equations. We identified 17,457 adults with ILD listed May 4, 2005 to September 31, 2023. At listing, mean absolute FVC was higher for White patients (2.03 ± 0.80 liters) than Black patients (1.61 ± 0.67 liters) and Asian patients (1.49 ± 0.86 liters). Differences were attenuated after applying race-specific equations (White patients 50.0 ± 17.5%, Black patients 47.7 ± 17.9%, Asian patients 46.2 ± 24.2%). Compared with race-neutral equations, race-specific equations had higher odds of classifying FVC as severe (≤40%) requiring listing in White patients (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28–1.40) but lower odds in Black patients (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74–0.90). Using race-neutral equations might help improve racial disparities for lung transplant candidates with ILD.
非白人间质性肺病(ILD)患者在肺移植候诊死亡率方面存在种族差异。肺量测定的种族特异性方程式可能会低估非白人候选人的限制严重程度。我们分析了美国肺移植候选人,以评估入选时强制肺活量(FVC)的差异,使用种族特异性和种族中性方程比较绝对值和调整值。从2005年5月4日至2023年9月31日,我们确定了17457名患有ILD的成年人。入组时,白人患者的平均绝对FVC(2.03±0.80升)高于黑人患者(1.61±0.67升)和亚裔患者(1.49±0.86升)。应用种族特异性方程(白人患者50.0±17.5%,黑人患者47.7±17.9%,亚洲患者46.2±24.2%)后,差异减弱。与种族中立方程相比,种族特异性方程在白人患者中将FVC分类为严重(≤40%)需要列出的几率更高(OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.40),而在黑人患者中则较低(OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90)。使用种族中立的方程可能有助于改善肺移植候选人ILD的种族差异。