An enhanced RPV model to better capture hotspot signatures in vegetation canopy reflectance observed by the geostationary meteorological satellite Himawari-8

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wei Yang , Zhi Qiao , Wei Li , Xuanlong Ma , Kazuhito Ichii
{"title":"An enhanced RPV model to better capture hotspot signatures in vegetation canopy reflectance observed by the geostationary meteorological satellite Himawari-8","authors":"Wei Yang ,&nbsp;Zhi Qiao ,&nbsp;Wei Li ,&nbsp;Xuanlong Ma ,&nbsp;Kazuhito Ichii","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2025.100222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hotspot effect denotes a special case of the Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) when the solar direction coincides with the sensor viewing direction, which is essential for remote estimation of canopy structure information. In contrast to polar-orbiting satellites, third-generation geostationary (GEO) meteorological satellites provide a new opportunity to investigate the hotpot effect at a modest spatial resolution (∼1 km) due to their extremely high observation frequencies. Nevertheless, modeling of the hotspot effect observed by GEO satellites is a significant challenge because their observations of Bidirectional Reflectance Factor (BRF) are usually off the principal plane. Among the existing semi-empirical BRDF models, the Rahman-Pinty-Verstraete (RPV) model has been widely applied to simulate intricate fields of canopy BRF. However, the RPV model has also been criticized for underestimating the hotspot signatures. Consequently, an enhanced version of the RPV model (i.e., ERPV) was proposed in this study to improve its capability for modeling the hotspot signatures of canopy reflectance. To verify the proposed ERPV model, a reflectance dataset of hotspot effect for different vegetation types was created using the atmospherically corrected Hiwamari-8 reflectance, and the ERPV model was applied to estimate foliage Clumping Index (CI) through constructing hotspot and dark spot within the principal plane. Validation results demonstrated that the land surface reflectance of Himwari-8 could measure the hotspot effect properly for each vegetation type. The EPRV model yielded satisfactory accuracies in capturing the hotspot signatures with Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) of 0.0034 and 0.0056, and Bias of −0.0019 and −0.0028, for the red and near-infrared (NIR) bands, respectively. In contrast, the RMSE and Bias for the original RPV model and three existing kernel-driven BRDF models ranged from 0.0187 to 0.125, and from −0.0149 to −0.114, respectively. Moreover, the estimated CI based on the ERPV model (0.66) was closer to the field measurement (0.65) for a mixed forest site than the RPV-based CI estimate (0.72) and the MODIS CI product (0.705). The findings demonstrate that our ERPV model can not only improve the modeling accuracies of hotspot signatures, but also has the potential to construct reliable BRF within the principal plane for CI retrieval.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017225000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hotspot effect denotes a special case of the Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) when the solar direction coincides with the sensor viewing direction, which is essential for remote estimation of canopy structure information. In contrast to polar-orbiting satellites, third-generation geostationary (GEO) meteorological satellites provide a new opportunity to investigate the hotpot effect at a modest spatial resolution (∼1 km) due to their extremely high observation frequencies. Nevertheless, modeling of the hotspot effect observed by GEO satellites is a significant challenge because their observations of Bidirectional Reflectance Factor (BRF) are usually off the principal plane. Among the existing semi-empirical BRDF models, the Rahman-Pinty-Verstraete (RPV) model has been widely applied to simulate intricate fields of canopy BRF. However, the RPV model has also been criticized for underestimating the hotspot signatures. Consequently, an enhanced version of the RPV model (i.e., ERPV) was proposed in this study to improve its capability for modeling the hotspot signatures of canopy reflectance. To verify the proposed ERPV model, a reflectance dataset of hotspot effect for different vegetation types was created using the atmospherically corrected Hiwamari-8 reflectance, and the ERPV model was applied to estimate foliage Clumping Index (CI) through constructing hotspot and dark spot within the principal plane. Validation results demonstrated that the land surface reflectance of Himwari-8 could measure the hotspot effect properly for each vegetation type. The EPRV model yielded satisfactory accuracies in capturing the hotspot signatures with Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) of 0.0034 and 0.0056, and Bias of −0.0019 and −0.0028, for the red and near-infrared (NIR) bands, respectively. In contrast, the RMSE and Bias for the original RPV model and three existing kernel-driven BRDF models ranged from 0.0187 to 0.125, and from −0.0149 to −0.114, respectively. Moreover, the estimated CI based on the ERPV model (0.66) was closer to the field measurement (0.65) for a mixed forest site than the RPV-based CI estimate (0.72) and the MODIS CI product (0.705). The findings demonstrate that our ERPV model can not only improve the modeling accuracies of hotspot signatures, but also has the potential to construct reliable BRF within the principal plane for CI retrieval.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信