Gender equity perceptions among pharmacy practice faculty in pharmacy academia

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Elizabeth J. Unni BPharm, Ph.D., Lourdes G. Planas Ph.D., Adriane N. Irwin Pharm.D., M.S., Henry N. Young Ph.D., Priyanka P. Gannavarapu M.S., Karen Nagel-Edwards Ph.D., Jamie C. Barner Ph.D., Ana C. Quiñones-Boex M.S., Ph.D., Michelle L. Blakely MEd, Ph.D., Michelle A. Clark Ph.D., Radhika Devraj Ph.D., Katie J. Suda Pharm.D., M.S., Tyan F. Thomas Pharm.D., M.S., MEd, Terri Warholak Ph.D.
{"title":"Gender equity perceptions among pharmacy practice faculty in pharmacy academia","authors":"Elizabeth J. Unni BPharm, Ph.D.,&nbsp;Lourdes G. Planas Ph.D.,&nbsp;Adriane N. Irwin Pharm.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Henry N. Young Ph.D.,&nbsp;Priyanka P. Gannavarapu M.S.,&nbsp;Karen Nagel-Edwards Ph.D.,&nbsp;Jamie C. Barner Ph.D.,&nbsp;Ana C. Quiñones-Boex M.S., Ph.D.,&nbsp;Michelle L. Blakely MEd, Ph.D.,&nbsp;Michelle A. Clark Ph.D.,&nbsp;Radhika Devraj Ph.D.,&nbsp;Katie J. Suda Pharm.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Tyan F. Thomas Pharm.D., M.S., MEd,&nbsp;Terri Warholak Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Gender equity is desired in academia, including pharmacy education. Several studies in the past have demonstrated a lack of gender equity in academia, including a recent study among social and administrative sciences faculty in pharmacy schools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to determine whether perceptions of gender inequity exist among pharmacy practice faculty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a validated survey instrument, gender equity perceptions related to teaching, research, service, recruitment, mentoring, and advancement were measured on a three-point Likert-type scale. Respondents were also asked if they had experienced gender inequity and, if so, at what academic rank and which type of institution. A link to the survey was sent to 2567 pharmacy practice faculty who were members of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy and/or the American Pharmacists Association. Descriptive analysis, followed by chi-square proportion comparisons, was conducted at 0.05 alpha.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 155 eligible pharmacy faculty who responded to the survey, the majority were non-Hispanic white women with a Doctor of Pharmacy degree. Gender inequity was reported by 64.7% of respondents and was associated with being women and with fewer years since their terminal degree. With regard to the three pillars of academia, women were more likely to perceive that men had more research resource allocations, less teaching and student success workload, more favorable teaching evaluation scores, and more favorable options for clinical and college service types. Similar perceptions were reported for recruitment, leadership opportunities, promotion and tenure, opportunities to be mentored, and respect from peers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Experiences of gender inequity as well as perceptions of gender inequity favoring men were found, particularly among women. This calls for the broader pharmacy practice community, as well as pharmacy academia leadership, to make intentional efforts to promote gender equity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"8 4","pages":"271-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Gender equity is desired in academia, including pharmacy education. Several studies in the past have demonstrated a lack of gender equity in academia, including a recent study among social and administrative sciences faculty in pharmacy schools.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to determine whether perceptions of gender inequity exist among pharmacy practice faculty.

Methods

Using a validated survey instrument, gender equity perceptions related to teaching, research, service, recruitment, mentoring, and advancement were measured on a three-point Likert-type scale. Respondents were also asked if they had experienced gender inequity and, if so, at what academic rank and which type of institution. A link to the survey was sent to 2567 pharmacy practice faculty who were members of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy and/or the American Pharmacists Association. Descriptive analysis, followed by chi-square proportion comparisons, was conducted at 0.05 alpha.

Results

Of the 155 eligible pharmacy faculty who responded to the survey, the majority were non-Hispanic white women with a Doctor of Pharmacy degree. Gender inequity was reported by 64.7% of respondents and was associated with being women and with fewer years since their terminal degree. With regard to the three pillars of academia, women were more likely to perceive that men had more research resource allocations, less teaching and student success workload, more favorable teaching evaluation scores, and more favorable options for clinical and college service types. Similar perceptions were reported for recruitment, leadership opportunities, promotion and tenure, opportunities to be mentored, and respect from peers.

Conclusion

Experiences of gender inequity as well as perceptions of gender inequity favoring men were found, particularly among women. This calls for the broader pharmacy practice community, as well as pharmacy academia leadership, to make intentional efforts to promote gender equity.

药学学术界药学实践教师的性别平等观念
学术界需要性别平等,包括药学教育。过去的几项研究表明,学术界缺乏性别平等,包括最近对药学院社会和行政科学教师的一项研究。目的本研究的目的是确定是否感知性别不平等存在于药学实践教师。方法采用行之有效的调查工具,采用李克特三分制量表对教学、研究、服务、招聘、指导和晋升等方面的性别平等观念进行测量。受访者还被问及他们是否经历过性别不平等,如果有,在什么学术级别和哪种类型的机构。该调查的链接被发送给2567名药学实践教师,他们是美国药学学院协会和/或美国药剂师协会的成员。描述性分析,随后进行卡方比例比较,alpha值为0.05。结果在接受调查的155名合格的药学教师中,大多数是非西班牙裔白人女性,拥有药学博士学位。64.7%的受访者报告了性别不平等,这与女性身份和毕业时间较短有关。在学术界的三大支柱方面,女性更倾向于认为男性拥有更多的研究资源分配,更少的教学和学生成功工作量,更有利的教学评估分数,以及更有利的临床和大学服务类型选择。在招聘、领导机会、晋升和终身职位、接受指导的机会以及同事的尊重方面,也有类似的看法。结论:发现性别不平等的经历以及对男性有利的性别不平等的看法,特别是在女性中。这需要更广泛的药学实践社区以及药学学术界的领导,为促进性别平等做出有意识的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信