Sébastien Viscardy, David C. Catling, Kevin Zahnle
{"title":"Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover","authors":"Sébastien Viscardy, David C. Catling, Kevin Zahnle","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re-analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (<0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10<sup>−3</sup>, suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two-step experiment to further investigate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008441","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re-analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (<0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10−3, suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two-step experiment to further investigate our findings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.