{"title":"The Role of Social Prescribing Interventions in Addressing Health Inequalities in the United Kingdom: A Narrative Review","authors":"Christiana Melam, Judith Dyson, Kate Thomson","doi":"10.1155/hsc/6613809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Social prescribing (SP), developed in the United Kingdom through general practice, has seen varied implementation worldwide, influenced by cultural, healthcare and political contexts. Among the various efforts to reduce health inequalities among individuals and groups, social prescribing has been proposed as a key intervention. Despite growing interest, there is a need for a critical examination of social prescribing’s role in addressing health inequalities.</p>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> This study aims to review the experiences of SP service users and service providers concerning the impact of SP on health inequalities in the United Kingdom. By synthesising existing evidence, it seeks to contribute to ongoing discussions and inform future research and policy directions.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A systematic search and narrative synthesis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched included Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, PsycArticles and PsycINFO, using keywords related to SP and inequalities.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 441 records were identified, with 20 papers meeting the inclusion criteria selected for analysis. The findings highlighted the positive role of SP in addressing the sociopsychological needs of patients and managing long-term conditions. Barriers included resource constraints, training limitations and accessibility challenges, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Facilitators emphasised the importance of the link worker/service user relationship, collaboration and integration.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> SP is important in addressing health inequalities, particularly by targeting sociopsychological factors and managing long-term conditions. However, the complexity of these inequalities requires more tailored models and research. None of the studies examined SP within NHS National Health Inequalities framework such as Core20PLUS5. Future research should explore how SP interventions align with and contribute to national efforts to reduce health inequalities. Overcoming barriers such as resource limitations, training gaps and accessibility challenges, while strengthening link-worker relationships, is essential. Multisectoral collaboration and integrating SP into clinical practices are key to enhancing its impact.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/6613809","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/6613809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Social prescribing (SP), developed in the United Kingdom through general practice, has seen varied implementation worldwide, influenced by cultural, healthcare and political contexts. Among the various efforts to reduce health inequalities among individuals and groups, social prescribing has been proposed as a key intervention. Despite growing interest, there is a need for a critical examination of social prescribing’s role in addressing health inequalities.
Aim: This study aims to review the experiences of SP service users and service providers concerning the impact of SP on health inequalities in the United Kingdom. By synthesising existing evidence, it seeks to contribute to ongoing discussions and inform future research and policy directions.
Methods: A systematic search and narrative synthesis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched included Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, PsycArticles and PsycINFO, using keywords related to SP and inequalities.
Results: A total of 441 records were identified, with 20 papers meeting the inclusion criteria selected for analysis. The findings highlighted the positive role of SP in addressing the sociopsychological needs of patients and managing long-term conditions. Barriers included resource constraints, training limitations and accessibility challenges, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Facilitators emphasised the importance of the link worker/service user relationship, collaboration and integration.
Conclusion: SP is important in addressing health inequalities, particularly by targeting sociopsychological factors and managing long-term conditions. However, the complexity of these inequalities requires more tailored models and research. None of the studies examined SP within NHS National Health Inequalities framework such as Core20PLUS5. Future research should explore how SP interventions align with and contribute to national efforts to reduce health inequalities. Overcoming barriers such as resource limitations, training gaps and accessibility challenges, while strengthening link-worker relationships, is essential. Multisectoral collaboration and integrating SP into clinical practices are key to enhancing its impact.
背景:社会处方(SP)在英国通过一般实践发展起来,在世界范围内受到文化、医疗保健和政治背景的影响,实施情况各不相同。在减少个人和群体之间健康不平等的各种努力中,社会处方已被提议作为一项关键干预措施。尽管人们越来越感兴趣,但仍有必要对社会处方在解决保健不平等问题方面的作用进行批判性审查。目的:本研究旨在回顾SP服务使用者和服务提供者关于SP对英国健康不平等的影响的经验。通过综合现有证据,它寻求为正在进行的讨论做出贡献,并为未来的研究和政策方向提供信息。方法:系统搜索和叙述综合遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。检索数据库包括Web of Science、CINAHL、Medline、PsycArticles和PsycINFO,使用与SP和不等式相关的关键词。结果:共筛选到441篇文献,选取符合纳入标准的文献20篇进行分析。研究结果强调了SP在解决患者的社会心理需求和管理长期病情方面的积极作用。障碍包括资源限制、培训限制和无障碍挑战,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间。主持人强调了工作人员/服务用户关系、协作和集成的重要性。结论:SP在解决保健不平等方面很重要,特别是针对社会心理因素和管理长期状况。然而,这些不平等的复杂性需要更有针对性的模型和研究。没有一项研究在Core20PLUS5等NHS国家健康不平等框架内检查SP。未来的研究应探讨SP干预措施如何配合并有助于减少卫生不平等的国家努力。克服资源限制、培训差距和无障碍挑战等障碍,同时加强工作人员之间的联系至关重要。多部门合作和将SP纳入临床实践是增强其影响的关键。
期刊介绍:
Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues