Individual Differences in Infants' Speech Segmentation Performance: The Role of Mother-Infant Cardiac Synchrony

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infancy Pub Date : 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1111/infa.70020
Monica Vanoncini, Ezgi Kayhan, Birgit Elsner, Moritz Wunderwald, Sebastian Wallot, Stefanie Hoehl, Natalie Boll-Avetisyan
{"title":"Individual Differences in Infants' Speech Segmentation Performance: The Role of Mother-Infant Cardiac Synchrony","authors":"Monica Vanoncini,&nbsp;Ezgi Kayhan,&nbsp;Birgit Elsner,&nbsp;Moritz Wunderwald,&nbsp;Sebastian Wallot,&nbsp;Stefanie Hoehl,&nbsp;Natalie Boll-Avetisyan","doi":"10.1111/infa.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Caregiver-infant coregulation is an early form of communication. This study investigated whether mother-infant biological coregulation is associated with 9-month-olds’ word segmentation performance, a crucial milestone predicting language development. We hypothesized that coregulation would relate with infants' word segmentation performance. Additionally, we examined whether this relationship is influenced by the caregiving environment (i.e., parental reflective functioning) and the infant's emotional state (i.e., positive affect). Coregulation was investigated via cardiac synchrony in 28 nine-month-old infants (16 females) during a 5-min free-play with their German-speaking mothers. Cardiac synchrony was measured through Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA), employing Recurrence Quantification Analysis to evaluate dyadic coupling (i.e., Recurrence Rate) and dyadic predictability (i.e., Entropy). Infants' word segmentation was measured with an eye-tracking central-fixation procedure. A stepwise regression revealed that higher dyadic coupling, but not predictability, of the dyads' RSA was associated with infants looking longer toward the screen when listening to novel as compared to familiar test words, indicating advanced word segmentation performance (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.25). Moreover, cardiac synchrony correlated positively with maternal sensitivity to their infant's mental states, but not with the infant's positive affect. These results suggest that caregiver-infant biological coregulation may play a foundational role in language acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.70020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caregiver-infant coregulation is an early form of communication. This study investigated whether mother-infant biological coregulation is associated with 9-month-olds’ word segmentation performance, a crucial milestone predicting language development. We hypothesized that coregulation would relate with infants' word segmentation performance. Additionally, we examined whether this relationship is influenced by the caregiving environment (i.e., parental reflective functioning) and the infant's emotional state (i.e., positive affect). Coregulation was investigated via cardiac synchrony in 28 nine-month-old infants (16 females) during a 5-min free-play with their German-speaking mothers. Cardiac synchrony was measured through Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA), employing Recurrence Quantification Analysis to evaluate dyadic coupling (i.e., Recurrence Rate) and dyadic predictability (i.e., Entropy). Infants' word segmentation was measured with an eye-tracking central-fixation procedure. A stepwise regression revealed that higher dyadic coupling, but not predictability, of the dyads' RSA was associated with infants looking longer toward the screen when listening to novel as compared to familiar test words, indicating advanced word segmentation performance (Cohen's d = 0.25). Moreover, cardiac synchrony correlated positively with maternal sensitivity to their infant's mental states, but not with the infant's positive affect. These results suggest that caregiver-infant biological coregulation may play a foundational role in language acquisition.

Abstract Image

婴儿言语分割表现的个体差异:母婴心脏同步的作用
照料者与婴儿的共同调节是一种早期的交流形式。本研究探讨了母婴生物协同调节是否与9个月大婴儿的分词能力有关,分词能力是预测语言发展的一个重要里程碑。我们假设协同调节与婴儿的分词表现有关。此外,我们还研究了这种关系是否受到照顾环境(即父母的反思功能)和婴儿的情绪状态(即积极影响)的影响。在28个9个月大的婴儿(16名女性)与讲德语的母亲自由玩耍5分钟期间,通过心脏同步研究了协同调节。通过呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)测量心脏同步性,采用复发量化分析(recurrent Quantification Analysis)评估双进耦合(即复发率)和双进可预测性(即熵)。婴儿的分词能力是用眼球追踪中心注视法测量的。逐步回归显示,与熟悉的测试词相比,婴儿在听小说时注视屏幕的时间更长,与之相关的是更高的双元耦合,而不是双元RSA的可预测性,这表明婴儿在分词方面表现得更出色(科恩的d = 0.25)。此外,心脏同步性与母亲对婴儿心理状态的敏感性呈正相关,而与婴儿的积极情绪无关。这些结果表明,照顾者-婴儿的生物协同调节可能在语言习得中起着基础作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信