Multimodal artificial intelligence approaches using large language models for expert-level landslide image analysis

IF 8.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Kittitouch Areerob, Van-Quang Nguyen, Xianfeng Li, Shogo Inadomi, Toru Shimada, Hiroyuki Kanasaki, Zhijie Wang, Masanori Suganuma, Keiji Nagatani, Pang-jo Chun, Takayuki Okatani
{"title":"Multimodal artificial intelligence approaches using large language models for expert-level landslide image analysis","authors":"Kittitouch Areerob, Van-Quang Nguyen, Xianfeng Li, Shogo Inadomi, Toru Shimada, Hiroyuki Kanasaki, Zhijie Wang, Masanori Suganuma, Keiji Nagatani, Pang-jo Chun, Takayuki Okatani","doi":"10.1111/mice.13482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change exacerbates natural disasters, demanding rapid damage and risk assessment. However, expert-reliant analyses delay responses despite drone-aided data collection. This study develops and compares multimodal AI approaches using advanced large language models (LLMs) for expert-level landslide image analysis. We tackle landslide-specific challenges: capturing nuanced geotechnical reasoning beyond data digitization (specific to geological features and risk assessment), developing specialized transfer learning and data augmentation to mitigate data scarcity and geological diversity in landslide imagery, and establishing tailored evaluation metrics including geological accuracy, risk validity, and decision utility for landslide analysis. Evaluating a visual question answering-large language model (VQA-LLM) hybrid (sequential visual processing) and a multimodal large language model (MLLM, simultaneous vision/text processing) shows that MLLM excels in disaster identification, while the VQA-LLM hybrid demonstrates superior performance in risk assessment, thereby informing optimal AI design choices. Our methodology, structuring 30+ years of expert commentary for AI training and employing a comprehensive evaluation framework including standard text metrics, LLM-based semantic analysis, and expert domain assessment, highlights the potential of hybrid systems and addresses knowledge transfer in data-sparse domains.","PeriodicalId":156,"journal":{"name":"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.13482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change exacerbates natural disasters, demanding rapid damage and risk assessment. However, expert-reliant analyses delay responses despite drone-aided data collection. This study develops and compares multimodal AI approaches using advanced large language models (LLMs) for expert-level landslide image analysis. We tackle landslide-specific challenges: capturing nuanced geotechnical reasoning beyond data digitization (specific to geological features and risk assessment), developing specialized transfer learning and data augmentation to mitigate data scarcity and geological diversity in landslide imagery, and establishing tailored evaluation metrics including geological accuracy, risk validity, and decision utility for landslide analysis. Evaluating a visual question answering-large language model (VQA-LLM) hybrid (sequential visual processing) and a multimodal large language model (MLLM, simultaneous vision/text processing) shows that MLLM excels in disaster identification, while the VQA-LLM hybrid demonstrates superior performance in risk assessment, thereby informing optimal AI design choices. Our methodology, structuring 30+ years of expert commentary for AI training and employing a comprehensive evaluation framework including standard text metrics, LLM-based semantic analysis, and expert domain assessment, highlights the potential of hybrid systems and addresses knowledge transfer in data-sparse domains.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
19.80%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering stands as a scholarly, peer-reviewed archival journal, serving as a vital link between advancements in computer technology and civil and infrastructure engineering. The journal serves as a distinctive platform for the publication of original articles, spotlighting novel computational techniques and inventive applications of computers. Specifically, it concentrates on recent progress in computer and information technologies, fostering the development and application of emerging computing paradigms. Encompassing a broad scope, the journal addresses bridge, construction, environmental, highway, geotechnical, structural, transportation, and water resources engineering. It extends its reach to the management of infrastructure systems, covering domains such as highways, bridges, pavements, airports, and utilities. The journal delves into areas like artificial intelligence, cognitive modeling, concurrent engineering, database management, distributed computing, evolutionary computing, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, geometric modeling, internet-based technologies, knowledge discovery and engineering, machine learning, mobile computing, multimedia technologies, networking, neural network computing, optimization and search, parallel processing, robotics, smart structures, software engineering, virtual reality, and visualization techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信