An Efficient Replication-Based Aggregation Verification and Correctness Assurance Scheme for Federated Learning

IF 5.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Shihong Wu;Yuchuan Luo;Shaojing Fu;Yingwen Chen;Ming Xu
{"title":"An Efficient Replication-Based Aggregation Verification and Correctness Assurance Scheme for Federated Learning","authors":"Shihong Wu;Yuchuan Luo;Shaojing Fu;Yingwen Chen;Ming Xu","doi":"10.1109/TSC.2024.3520833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federated learning(FL), enabling multiple clients collaboratively to train a model via a parameter server, is an effective approach to address the issue of data silos. However, due to the self-interest and laziness of servers, they may not correctly aggregate the global model parameters, which will cause the final model trained to deviate from the training goal. In the existing proposals, the cryptography-based verification scheme involves heavy computation overheads. On the other hand, the replication-based verification method, relying on a dual-server architecture, can ensure the correctness of aggregation and reduce computation overheads, but incur at least twice the communication cost as that of the task itself. To address these issues, we propose a novel replication-based aggregation scheme for FL, which enables efficient verification and stronger correctness assurance. The scheme employs a main-secondary server architecture, which allows the secondary servers to partakes in aggregation tasks at a predetermined probability, consequently mitigating the validation overhead. Moreover, we resort to the game theory and design a Learning Contract to impose penalties on dishonest servers, enforcing rational servers to correctly compute global model parameters. Under the use of Betrayal Contract to prevent collusion among servers, we further design a training game to efficiently verify global model parameters and ensure their correctness. Finally, we analyze the correctness of the proposed scheme and demonstrate that the computational overhead of our scheme is <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\frac{{n + 1}}{{2n}}$</tex-math></inline-formula> of the previous replication-based validation scheme, obtaining a significant reduction in communication cost, where <inline-formula><tex-math>$n$</tex-math></inline-formula> means the training rounds. Experimental results further validate our deduction.","PeriodicalId":13255,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Services Computing","volume":"18 2","pages":"633-646"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Services Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10963996/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federated learning(FL), enabling multiple clients collaboratively to train a model via a parameter server, is an effective approach to address the issue of data silos. However, due to the self-interest and laziness of servers, they may not correctly aggregate the global model parameters, which will cause the final model trained to deviate from the training goal. In the existing proposals, the cryptography-based verification scheme involves heavy computation overheads. On the other hand, the replication-based verification method, relying on a dual-server architecture, can ensure the correctness of aggregation and reduce computation overheads, but incur at least twice the communication cost as that of the task itself. To address these issues, we propose a novel replication-based aggregation scheme for FL, which enables efficient verification and stronger correctness assurance. The scheme employs a main-secondary server architecture, which allows the secondary servers to partakes in aggregation tasks at a predetermined probability, consequently mitigating the validation overhead. Moreover, we resort to the game theory and design a Learning Contract to impose penalties on dishonest servers, enforcing rational servers to correctly compute global model parameters. Under the use of Betrayal Contract to prevent collusion among servers, we further design a training game to efficiently verify global model parameters and ensure their correctness. Finally, we analyze the correctness of the proposed scheme and demonstrate that the computational overhead of our scheme is $\frac{{n + 1}}{{2n}}$ of the previous replication-based validation scheme, obtaining a significant reduction in communication cost, where $n$ means the training rounds. Experimental results further validate our deduction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
278
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Services Computing encompasses the computing and software aspects of the science and technology of services innovation research and development. It places emphasis on algorithmic, mathematical, statistical, and computational methods central to services computing. Topics covered include Service Oriented Architecture, Web Services, Business Process Integration, Solution Performance Management, and Services Operations and Management. The transactions address mathematical foundations, security, privacy, agreement, contract, discovery, negotiation, collaboration, and quality of service for web services. It also covers areas like composite web service creation, business and scientific applications, standards, utility models, business process modeling, integration, collaboration, and more in the realm of Services Computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信