{"title":"A strategy for liver selective NRF2 induction via cytochrome P450 activated prodrugs with low activity in hypoxia.","authors":"Mei Ying Ng,Thilo Hagen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Activation of the transcription factor NRF2 has been shown to be a promising therapeutic approach in the treatment of hepatosteatosis. NRF2 is believed to exert beneficial effects by upregulating cellular oxidative defense mechanisms and inhibiting inflammation. However, a major concern associated with long-term treatment with NRF2 activators are drug side effects, including the promotion of tumorigenesis. Many NRF2 activators function by forming cysteine adducts with KEAP1, which normally mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of NRF2. In this study we identified NRF2 activator prodrugs of 4-methylcatechol and tert-butylhydroquinone. These prodrugs are converted into their active metabolites in a liver selective, cytochrome P450 dependent manner and function by inhibiting KEAP1, resulting in NRF2 activation. Unexpectedly, we also found that a number of NRF2 activating compounds, including 4-methylcatechol and tert-butylhydroquinone, show a markedly lower activity under hypoxic conditions compared to normoxia. Our findings suggest that the lower activity of these NRF2 inducers is a consequence of less potent cysteine adduct formation with KEAP1. The lower activity of NRF2 inducing compounds in hypoxia may limit tumor promoting effects of NRF2 induction. Our study provides an important proof of concept that it is possible to selectively activate NRF2 in the liver for the treatment of hepatosteatosis while avoiding tumorigenic effects as well as side effects of NRF2 activation in other tissues.","PeriodicalId":15140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","volume":"16 1","pages":"108487"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108487","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Activation of the transcription factor NRF2 has been shown to be a promising therapeutic approach in the treatment of hepatosteatosis. NRF2 is believed to exert beneficial effects by upregulating cellular oxidative defense mechanisms and inhibiting inflammation. However, a major concern associated with long-term treatment with NRF2 activators are drug side effects, including the promotion of tumorigenesis. Many NRF2 activators function by forming cysteine adducts with KEAP1, which normally mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of NRF2. In this study we identified NRF2 activator prodrugs of 4-methylcatechol and tert-butylhydroquinone. These prodrugs are converted into their active metabolites in a liver selective, cytochrome P450 dependent manner and function by inhibiting KEAP1, resulting in NRF2 activation. Unexpectedly, we also found that a number of NRF2 activating compounds, including 4-methylcatechol and tert-butylhydroquinone, show a markedly lower activity under hypoxic conditions compared to normoxia. Our findings suggest that the lower activity of these NRF2 inducers is a consequence of less potent cysteine adduct formation with KEAP1. The lower activity of NRF2 inducing compounds in hypoxia may limit tumor promoting effects of NRF2 induction. Our study provides an important proof of concept that it is possible to selectively activate NRF2 in the liver for the treatment of hepatosteatosis while avoiding tumorigenic effects as well as side effects of NRF2 activation in other tissues.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biological Chemistry welcomes high-quality science that seeks to elucidate the molecular and cellular basis of biological processes. Papers published in JBC can therefore fall under the umbrellas of not only biological chemistry, chemical biology, or biochemistry, but also allied disciplines such as biophysics, systems biology, RNA biology, immunology, microbiology, neurobiology, epigenetics, computational biology, ’omics, and many more. The outcome of our focus on papers that contribute novel and important mechanistic insights, rather than on a particular topic area, is that JBC is truly a melting pot for scientists across disciplines. In addition, JBC welcomes papers that describe methods that will help scientists push their biochemical inquiries forward and resources that will be of use to the research community.