The Landscape of Research on Contextualized Science Learning: A Bibliometric Network Review

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Michael Giamellaro, Cory Buxton, Joseph Taylor, Jean-Philippe Ayotte-Beaudet, Kassandra L'Heureux, Marie-Claude Beaudry
{"title":"The Landscape of Research on Contextualized Science Learning: A Bibliometric Network Review","authors":"Michael Giamellaro,&nbsp;Cory Buxton,&nbsp;Joseph Taylor,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Ayotte-Beaudet,&nbsp;Kassandra L'Heureux,&nbsp;Marie-Claude Beaudry","doi":"10.1002/sce.21937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The vast and rapidly growing amount of science education research makes it challenging for researchers to navigate and synthesize developments across the field, particularly concerning broad concepts evolving along divergent paths. To address this issue, a novel review methodology employing bibliometrics and network analysis was tested to identify and characterize clusters of research focused on the relationship between school-based science learning and contexts where that science is applied, experienced, observable, or otherwise relevant (e.g., socio-scientific inquiry, place-based learning, culturally-responsive pedagogy). Using a sample of 935 academic papers, the bibliometric network analysis revealed the landscape of contextualized science learning research, identifying 13 distinct clusters of scholarship. Bibliometric and qualitative data were used to describe the research trends within clusters and confirm they were conceptually meaningful and distinct. This methodology facilitated greater understanding of how research can become clustered into “invisible colleges” over time, offering a synthesis approach to grasp interrelated lines of research within an evolving landscape. The methodology has potential to identify other schools of thought or overarching themes in science education, enhancing researchers’ ability to perceive the field as a coherent landscape of interconnected ideas or to identify specific research trajectories within a broad concept.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"109 3","pages":"851-875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21937","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21937","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vast and rapidly growing amount of science education research makes it challenging for researchers to navigate and synthesize developments across the field, particularly concerning broad concepts evolving along divergent paths. To address this issue, a novel review methodology employing bibliometrics and network analysis was tested to identify and characterize clusters of research focused on the relationship between school-based science learning and contexts where that science is applied, experienced, observable, or otherwise relevant (e.g., socio-scientific inquiry, place-based learning, culturally-responsive pedagogy). Using a sample of 935 academic papers, the bibliometric network analysis revealed the landscape of contextualized science learning research, identifying 13 distinct clusters of scholarship. Bibliometric and qualitative data were used to describe the research trends within clusters and confirm they were conceptually meaningful and distinct. This methodology facilitated greater understanding of how research can become clustered into “invisible colleges” over time, offering a synthesis approach to grasp interrelated lines of research within an evolving landscape. The methodology has potential to identify other schools of thought or overarching themes in science education, enhancing researchers’ ability to perceive the field as a coherent landscape of interconnected ideas or to identify specific research trajectories within a broad concept.

Abstract Image

情境化科学学习的研究图景:文献计量学网络回顾
科学教育研究的数量庞大且迅速增长,这使得研究人员很难驾驭和综合整个领域的发展,特别是涉及沿着不同路径发展的广泛概念。为了解决这一问题,我们测试了一种采用文献计量学和网络分析的新型综述方法,以确定和表征专注于学校科学学习与科学应用、经验、可观察或其他相关环境(例如,社会科学探究、基于地点的学习、文化响应教学法)之间关系的研究集群。利用935篇学术论文的样本,文献计量网络分析揭示了情境化科学学习研究的格局,确定了13个不同的学术集群。文献计量学和定性数据用于描述集群内的研究趋势,并确认它们在概念上有意义和不同。这种方法有助于更好地理解研究如何随着时间的推移聚集成“看不见的学院”,提供了一种综合方法,在不断变化的环境中掌握相互关联的研究线。该方法有可能确定科学教育中的其他思想流派或总体主题,增强研究人员将该领域视为相互关联的思想的连贯景观的能力,或者在一个广泛的概念中确定具体的研究轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信