Peak early-phase enhancement ratio on contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from oncocytoma

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70017
Deanna Thorson, Davide Bova, Maria M. Picken, Marcus L. Quek, Gopal N. Gupta, Hiten D. Patel
{"title":"Peak early-phase enhancement ratio on contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from oncocytoma","authors":"Deanna Thorson,&nbsp;Davide Bova,&nbsp;Maria M. Picken,&nbsp;Marcus L. Quek,&nbsp;Gopal N. Gupta,&nbsp;Hiten D. Patel","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the feasibility of using the peak early-phase enhancement ratio (PEER) of tumour to renal cortex measured on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) and oncocytoma, which are difficult to differentiate on renal mass biopsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A consecutive case–control study was conducted of patients with chRCC or oncocytoma based on surgical pathology (2006–2020). Two radiologists blinded to pathology results independently measured PEER values on MRI for each tumour. PEER values were compared with surgical pathology results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For the 18 renal tumours evaluated, PEER values were higher for the 7 oncocytomas than for the 11 chRCCs (median 1.33 versus 0.55, p &lt; 0.001). Agreement between the image interpreters was high (Pearson's: 0.90). PEER cutoff values ranging from 0.98 to 1.05 provided high performance in identifying chRCC. A PEER cutoff value of ≤1.05 had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for the averaged PEER measurements between the two radiologists. High accuracy in identifying chRCC was also achieved for each individual image interpreter using the cutoff value of ≤1.05, with sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 85.7%, PPV of 91.7% and NPV of 100% for radiologist #1 and sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 85.7%, PPV of 90.9% and NPV of 85.7% for radiologist #2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Differentiating chRCCs from oncocytomas using PEER measurements obtained from contrast-enhanced MRI is feasible and reproducible between radiologists. We identified an accurate range for PEER cutoff values (0.98 to 1.05) requiring validation and adjustment in additional cohorts to maintain high sensitivity for detecting chRCC and negative predictive value. Using MRI PEER to evaluate oncocytic tumours with a differential diagnosis of chRCC versus oncocytoma based on biopsy pathology may help avoid unnecessary intervention for oncocytomas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of using the peak early-phase enhancement ratio (PEER) of tumour to renal cortex measured on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) and oncocytoma, which are difficult to differentiate on renal mass biopsy.

Patients and Methods

A consecutive case–control study was conducted of patients with chRCC or oncocytoma based on surgical pathology (2006–2020). Two radiologists blinded to pathology results independently measured PEER values on MRI for each tumour. PEER values were compared with surgical pathology results.

Results

For the 18 renal tumours evaluated, PEER values were higher for the 7 oncocytomas than for the 11 chRCCs (median 1.33 versus 0.55, p < 0.001). Agreement between the image interpreters was high (Pearson's: 0.90). PEER cutoff values ranging from 0.98 to 1.05 provided high performance in identifying chRCC. A PEER cutoff value of ≤1.05 had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for the averaged PEER measurements between the two radiologists. High accuracy in identifying chRCC was also achieved for each individual image interpreter using the cutoff value of ≤1.05, with sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 85.7%, PPV of 91.7% and NPV of 100% for radiologist #1 and sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 85.7%, PPV of 90.9% and NPV of 85.7% for radiologist #2.

Conclusion

Differentiating chRCCs from oncocytomas using PEER measurements obtained from contrast-enhanced MRI is feasible and reproducible between radiologists. We identified an accurate range for PEER cutoff values (0.98 to 1.05) requiring validation and adjustment in additional cohorts to maintain high sensitivity for detecting chRCC and negative predictive value. Using MRI PEER to evaluate oncocytic tumours with a differential diagnosis of chRCC versus oncocytoma based on biopsy pathology may help avoid unnecessary intervention for oncocytomas.

Abstract Image

对比增强MRI早期峰值增强比值鉴别嗜色性肾细胞癌与嗜癌细胞瘤
目的探讨利用磁共振成像(MRI)测量肿瘤与肾皮质的早期增强比(PEER)鉴别肾组织活检难以鉴别的嫌色性肾细胞癌(chRCC)和嗜瘤细胞瘤的可行性。患者和方法对基于手术病理的chRCC或癌细胞瘤患者进行了连续的病例对照研究(2006-2020)。两名不知道病理结果的放射科医生独立测量了每个肿瘤的MRI上的PEER值。比较手术病理结果的PEER值。结果在评估的18个肾肿瘤中,7个癌细胞瘤的PEER值高于11个chrcc(中位数为1.33比0.55,p < 0.001)。图像解释器之间的一致性很高(Pearson’s: 0.90)。PEER截断值范围从0.98到1.05提供了识别chRCC的高性能。当PEER截断值≤1.05时,两名放射科医生的平均PEER测量值的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)均为100%。每个图像解释器识别chRCC的准确率也很高,截断值≤1.05,放射科医生1的灵敏度为100%,特异性为85.7%,PPV为91.7%,NPV为100%,放射科医生2的灵敏度为90.9%,特异性为85.7%,PPV为90.9%,NPV为85.7%。结论通过对比增强MRI获得的PEER测量值来鉴别chrcc和癌细胞瘤是可行的,并且在放射科医师之间具有可重复性。我们确定了PEER截断值的准确范围(0.98至1.05),需要在其他队列中进行验证和调整,以保持检测chRCC和阴性预测值的高灵敏度。使用MRI PEER评估嗜瘤细胞肿瘤,并根据活检病理区分诊断为chRCC与嗜瘤细胞瘤,可能有助于避免对嗜瘤细胞瘤进行不必要的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信