Rate of Incidental Lung Nodule Follow-Up: A Cohort Study Evaluating Adherence to Guideline Recommendations

Zein Kattih , Jonathan A Moore , Brandon Wilson , Sravani Gajjala , Jacob Schwartz , Josef Kushner , Sean Zajac , Akhilesh Mahajan , Tungming Leung , Priyanka Makkar
{"title":"Rate of Incidental Lung Nodule Follow-Up: A Cohort Study Evaluating Adherence to Guideline Recommendations","authors":"Zein Kattih ,&nbsp;Jonathan A Moore ,&nbsp;Brandon Wilson ,&nbsp;Sravani Gajjala ,&nbsp;Jacob Schwartz ,&nbsp;Josef Kushner ,&nbsp;Sean Zajac ,&nbsp;Akhilesh Mahajan ,&nbsp;Tungming Leung ,&nbsp;Priyanka Makkar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are commonly identified on imaging studies, and guidelines exist for follow-up. Adherence to guideline recommendations varies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review at a single center in a metropolitan hospital to identify characteristics of patients with lung nodules and determine the rate of follow-up of these patients. A total of 1266 patient records were reviewed, and 341 patients with solitary pulmonary nodules were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The presence of emphysema was associated with an increased rate of follow-up with an odds ratio of 1.9. Of the patients with SPNs, 52% do not receive appropriate follow-up. Of the nodules identified, 40% were noted to be enlarged compared to prior imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Identification of SPNs requires a standard approach to ensure follow-up for early detection of potential malignancy. Appropriate follow-up allows improvement of the rate of early cancer detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036425000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are commonly identified on imaging studies, and guidelines exist for follow-up. Adherence to guideline recommendations varies.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review at a single center in a metropolitan hospital to identify characteristics of patients with lung nodules and determine the rate of follow-up of these patients. A total of 1266 patient records were reviewed, and 341 patients with solitary pulmonary nodules were identified.

Results

The presence of emphysema was associated with an increased rate of follow-up with an odds ratio of 1.9. Of the patients with SPNs, 52% do not receive appropriate follow-up. Of the nodules identified, 40% were noted to be enlarged compared to prior imaging.

Conclusions

Identification of SPNs requires a standard approach to ensure follow-up for early detection of potential malignancy. Appropriate follow-up allows improvement of the rate of early cancer detection.
偶发肺结节随访率:一项评估指南建议依从性的队列研究
背景:孤立性肺结节(spn)通常在影像学检查中被识别出来,并且存在随访指南。对指南建议的遵守情况各不相同。方法回顾性分析某大城市医院单中心肺结节患者的特点,确定随访率。共回顾了1266例患者的记录,并确定了341例孤立性肺结节。结果肺气肿的存在与随访率增加相关,比值比为1.9。在spn患者中,52%没有得到适当的随访。在确诊的结节中,40%的结节与先前的影像学相比增大。结论SPNs的诊断需要一个标准的方法来确保早期发现潜在的恶性肿瘤的随访。适当的随访可以提高早期癌症的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信