Attitudes of older patients toward artificial intelligence in decision-making in healthcare

Moustaq Karim Khan Rony , Tuli Rani Deb , Most. Tahmina Khatun , Latifun Nesa , Jeni Begum , Mahabuba Afrin , Md. Abdun Noor , Mosammat Ruma Akter , Mst. Amena Khatun , Most. Hasina Begum , Mst. Rina Parvin , Fazila Akter
{"title":"Attitudes of older patients toward artificial intelligence in decision-making in healthcare","authors":"Moustaq Karim Khan Rony ,&nbsp;Tuli Rani Deb ,&nbsp;Most. Tahmina Khatun ,&nbsp;Latifun Nesa ,&nbsp;Jeni Begum ,&nbsp;Mahabuba Afrin ,&nbsp;Md. Abdun Noor ,&nbsp;Mosammat Ruma Akter ,&nbsp;Mst. Amena Khatun ,&nbsp;Most. Hasina Begum ,&nbsp;Mst. Rina Parvin ,&nbsp;Fazila Akter","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, promising improved diagnostics and efficiency. However, the ethical implications and patient perspectives, particularly among older adults, remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore the ethical considerations and attitudes of older patients toward AI in healthcare decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted qualitative research in the geriatric wards of three hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, using the Technology Acceptance Model and a phenomenological approach as the guiding frameworks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 purposively sampled participants, all aged 60 and above. Data were collected in Bangla, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed through thematic analysis. Methodological rigor was maintained through member checking, triangulation, and reflexive practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five key themes emerged: (1) Trust and skepticism toward AI’s decision-making capabilities, with concerns about its ability to address nuanced health needs; (2) A strong preference for human interaction over technological efficiency, highlighting the irreplaceable value of empathy; (3) Ethical concerns regarding informed consent, emphasizing the need for transparent and comprehensible AI integration; (4) Apprehension about privacy and data security, reflecting a trust deficit in AI’s handling of sensitive health information; and (5) Mixed perceptions on AI’s role in enhancing or diminishing the quality of care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the need for transparent, patient-centered AI systems that enhance, rather than replace, human elements in care. Addressing ethical concerns about privacy, autonomy, and informed consent is critical to fostering trust and acceptance among older patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, promising improved diagnostics and efficiency. However, the ethical implications and patient perspectives, particularly among older adults, remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore the ethical considerations and attitudes of older patients toward AI in healthcare decision-making.

Methods

We conducted qualitative research in the geriatric wards of three hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, using the Technology Acceptance Model and a phenomenological approach as the guiding frameworks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 purposively sampled participants, all aged 60 and above. Data were collected in Bangla, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed through thematic analysis. Methodological rigor was maintained through member checking, triangulation, and reflexive practices.

Results

Five key themes emerged: (1) Trust and skepticism toward AI’s decision-making capabilities, with concerns about its ability to address nuanced health needs; (2) A strong preference for human interaction over technological efficiency, highlighting the irreplaceable value of empathy; (3) Ethical concerns regarding informed consent, emphasizing the need for transparent and comprehensible AI integration; (4) Apprehension about privacy and data security, reflecting a trust deficit in AI’s handling of sensitive health information; and (5) Mixed perceptions on AI’s role in enhancing or diminishing the quality of care.

Conclusions

This study underscores the need for transparent, patient-centered AI systems that enhance, rather than replace, human elements in care. Addressing ethical concerns about privacy, autonomy, and informed consent is critical to fostering trust and acceptance among older patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信