Validity evidence for a feedback tool for an interprofessional standardized patient experience: A qualitative pilot study with evaluation of content, response processes, consequences of testing, and feedback quality

Q3 Social Sciences
Lauren East , Alison Stevens , Heather Hageman , Monica Perlmutter , Favour Garuba , Tamara Burlis , Dennis Chang , Angela McConachie , Janice Hanson
{"title":"Validity evidence for a feedback tool for an interprofessional standardized patient experience: A qualitative pilot study with evaluation of content, response processes, consequences of testing, and feedback quality","authors":"Lauren East ,&nbsp;Alison Stevens ,&nbsp;Heather Hageman ,&nbsp;Monica Perlmutter ,&nbsp;Favour Garuba ,&nbsp;Tamara Burlis ,&nbsp;Dennis Chang ,&nbsp;Angela McConachie ,&nbsp;Janice Hanson","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Interprofessional Standardized Patient Team Experience (SPTE) occurred three times during academic year 2020–2021 and involved medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physical therapy students. Teams comprising a mix of these professional students practiced clinical skills with a standardized patient and developed a discharge plan for the patient. Prior to this academic year, student teams had received verbal feedback during a debriefing session at the end of the experience but had not received written feedback, and there had not been a way to verify that the feedback provided aligned with the session objectives. There were few available comprehensive validated tools for interprofessional simulation feedback and debriefing, none of which were ideal for SPTE.</div><div>The SPTE Feedback and Reflection Form was developed to address these issues. Our study aimed to provide evidence of validity for the SPTE Feedback and Reflection Form and assess the quality of the feedback provided on the form. Validity evidence was collected using Messick's framework, qualitative data were used to evaluate consequences of testing, and the quality of the feedback was evaluated using a tool for narrative feedback assessment called EFeCT.</div><div>Facilitators reviewed course objectives and team development measures prior to the simulations and grouped observed team actions accordingly. Faculty provided specific examples of team behaviors that were aligned with session objectives. Use of the SPTE Feedback and Reflection Form fostered provision of high-quality feedback that addressed interprofessional objectives and prepared students to participate in interprofessional teams in clinical settings. The form is not SPTE-specific and potentially applies to other institutions’ interprofessional simulation activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452625000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Interprofessional Standardized Patient Team Experience (SPTE) occurred three times during academic year 2020–2021 and involved medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physical therapy students. Teams comprising a mix of these professional students practiced clinical skills with a standardized patient and developed a discharge plan for the patient. Prior to this academic year, student teams had received verbal feedback during a debriefing session at the end of the experience but had not received written feedback, and there had not been a way to verify that the feedback provided aligned with the session objectives. There were few available comprehensive validated tools for interprofessional simulation feedback and debriefing, none of which were ideal for SPTE.
The SPTE Feedback and Reflection Form was developed to address these issues. Our study aimed to provide evidence of validity for the SPTE Feedback and Reflection Form and assess the quality of the feedback provided on the form. Validity evidence was collected using Messick's framework, qualitative data were used to evaluate consequences of testing, and the quality of the feedback was evaluated using a tool for narrative feedback assessment called EFeCT.
Facilitators reviewed course objectives and team development measures prior to the simulations and grouped observed team actions accordingly. Faculty provided specific examples of team behaviors that were aligned with session objectives. Use of the SPTE Feedback and Reflection Form fostered provision of high-quality feedback that addressed interprofessional objectives and prepared students to participate in interprofessional teams in clinical settings. The form is not SPTE-specific and potentially applies to other institutions’ interprofessional simulation activities.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信