Length of Stay and Its Affecting Factors in a General Hospital of a Multiple Nationality City in Western China

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Li Fang, Wei Yi Yang, Hui Ling Liu, Zi Yang Fang, Qian Li Tang, Jin Hua Wang, Ren Rong Gong
{"title":"Length of Stay and Its Affecting Factors in a General Hospital of a Multiple Nationality City in Western China","authors":"Li Fang,&nbsp;Wei Yi Yang,&nbsp;Hui Ling Liu,&nbsp;Zi Yang Fang,&nbsp;Qian Li Tang,&nbsp;Jin Hua Wang,&nbsp;Ren Rong Gong","doi":"10.1111/jep.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Length of stay (LOS) serves as a key metric for assessing hospital efficiency. However, LOS is complex and multidimensional, and influenced by various factors that require further explorations. The purpose of the present study was to examine factors and their interactions affecting LOS in a general hospital in western China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study involved 9631 cases admitted to a tertiary general hospital in Guangxi province, China, from December 2018 to October 2020. LOS and 17 additional variables were collected from the Hospital Information System and integratively analyzed. As a novel factor created in the current study, agreement between admission and discharge departments was evaluated by comparing the admission department with the discharge department. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to analyze the relationship of LOS with other variables. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify predictors of LOS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Variations in LOS were noted among patients based on gender, occupation, patient sources, contact persons, admission types, discharge types, disease severity types or medical payment methods, or patients with or without agreement between admission and discharge departments, the presence of hospital acquired infections (HAI) or antibiotic usages. No significant differences were found related to nationalities, marital statuses, patients with or without agreement between outpatient and discharge diagnoses, or agreement between admission and discharge diagnoses. Moreover, the number of hospitalizations, admission type, discharge type, disease severity type, agreement between admission and discharge departments, HAI, antibiotic usage, and medical payment method significantly predicted LOS, while others did not. The direct effects of agreement between admission and discharge departments on LOS were 86.88% of the total effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Factors affecting LOS were observed in the hospital, including agreement between admission and discharge departments. Recommendations should focus on resource allocation and optimization in decision-making to direct patients to suitable departments while improving other critical factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Length of stay (LOS) serves as a key metric for assessing hospital efficiency. However, LOS is complex and multidimensional, and influenced by various factors that require further explorations. The purpose of the present study was to examine factors and their interactions affecting LOS in a general hospital in western China.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved 9631 cases admitted to a tertiary general hospital in Guangxi province, China, from December 2018 to October 2020. LOS and 17 additional variables were collected from the Hospital Information System and integratively analyzed. As a novel factor created in the current study, agreement between admission and discharge departments was evaluated by comparing the admission department with the discharge department. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to analyze the relationship of LOS with other variables. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify predictors of LOS.

Results

Variations in LOS were noted among patients based on gender, occupation, patient sources, contact persons, admission types, discharge types, disease severity types or medical payment methods, or patients with or without agreement between admission and discharge departments, the presence of hospital acquired infections (HAI) or antibiotic usages. No significant differences were found related to nationalities, marital statuses, patients with or without agreement between outpatient and discharge diagnoses, or agreement between admission and discharge diagnoses. Moreover, the number of hospitalizations, admission type, discharge type, disease severity type, agreement between admission and discharge departments, HAI, antibiotic usage, and medical payment method significantly predicted LOS, while others did not. The direct effects of agreement between admission and discharge departments on LOS were 86.88% of the total effects.

Conclusion

Factors affecting LOS were observed in the hospital, including agreement between admission and discharge departments. Recommendations should focus on resource allocation and optimization in decision-making to direct patients to suitable departments while improving other critical factors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信