Effects of patient survey feedback on improving patient experience with outpatient magnetic resonance imaging

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Evie Nguyen , Christopher A. Dodoo MS , Imon Banerjee PhD , Fatima Al-Khafaji MBChB , Jacob A. Varner , Iridian Jaramillo MS , Meghana Nadella MS , Tyler M. Kuo , Zoe Deahl , Dyan G. DeYoung , Nelly Tan MD
{"title":"Effects of patient survey feedback on improving patient experience with outpatient magnetic resonance imaging","authors":"Evie Nguyen ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Dodoo MS ,&nbsp;Imon Banerjee PhD ,&nbsp;Fatima Al-Khafaji MBChB ,&nbsp;Jacob A. Varner ,&nbsp;Iridian Jaramillo MS ,&nbsp;Meghana Nadella MS ,&nbsp;Tyler M. Kuo ,&nbsp;Zoe Deahl ,&nbsp;Dyan G. DeYoung ,&nbsp;Nelly Tan MD","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.10.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We examined the feasibility of collecting timely patient feedback after outpatient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the effect of radiology staff responses or actions on patient experience scores.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included 6043 patients who completed a feedback survey via email after undergoing outpatient MRI at a tertiary care medical center between April 2021 and September 2022. The survey consisted of the question “How was your radiology visit?” with a 5-point emoji-Likert scale, an open-text feedback box, and an option to request a response. The primary outcome measure analyzed was the “top box” score (ie, the percentage of 5/5 scores) reflecting overall patient satisfaction. For comparison, Press Ganey quarterly top box scores from a separate group of patients who underwent outpatient MRI concurrent with the study period were also analyzed. Patient-reported feedback was categorized by using natural language processing and analyzed along with radiology staff responses and actions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The top box score for “How was your radiology visit?” increased from 81.1% during the first month of the study to 86.1% during the last month. Similarly, the comparative Press Ganey top box scores for questions related to “radiology staff concern for comfort” and “courtesy of radiology technologist” increased from the first quarter to the last quarter of the study. Patients reported service excellence in 59.2% of surveys (<em>n</em>=3576), long wait time in 6.3% (<em>n</em>=383), and poor communication in 6.1% (<em>n</em>=369). Some praise from patients was shared with staff members who interacted with the patients. Of all survey responses, 5.5% required radiology staff responses or actions, such as sharing feedback with supervisors, providing direct feedback to staff, and making telephone calls to patients. From the first half to the second half of the study, the median (IQR) wait time decreased from 46 (32–66) minutes to 45 (31–64) minutes (<em>P</em>=.02), and the percentage of patients who reported long wait time decreased from 7.4% to 5.4% (<em>P</em>=.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study highlights the feasibility of obtaining timely patient feedback after outpatient MRI and using it to improve patient experience. These results may contribute to the development of more patient-centered care in the field of radiology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 369-376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036301882400207X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We examined the feasibility of collecting timely patient feedback after outpatient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the effect of radiology staff responses or actions on patient experience scores.

Methods

This study included 6043 patients who completed a feedback survey via email after undergoing outpatient MRI at a tertiary care medical center between April 2021 and September 2022. The survey consisted of the question “How was your radiology visit?” with a 5-point emoji-Likert scale, an open-text feedback box, and an option to request a response. The primary outcome measure analyzed was the “top box” score (ie, the percentage of 5/5 scores) reflecting overall patient satisfaction. For comparison, Press Ganey quarterly top box scores from a separate group of patients who underwent outpatient MRI concurrent with the study period were also analyzed. Patient-reported feedback was categorized by using natural language processing and analyzed along with radiology staff responses and actions.

Results

The top box score for “How was your radiology visit?” increased from 81.1% during the first month of the study to 86.1% during the last month. Similarly, the comparative Press Ganey top box scores for questions related to “radiology staff concern for comfort” and “courtesy of radiology technologist” increased from the first quarter to the last quarter of the study. Patients reported service excellence in 59.2% of surveys (n=3576), long wait time in 6.3% (n=383), and poor communication in 6.1% (n=369). Some praise from patients was shared with staff members who interacted with the patients. Of all survey responses, 5.5% required radiology staff responses or actions, such as sharing feedback with supervisors, providing direct feedback to staff, and making telephone calls to patients. From the first half to the second half of the study, the median (IQR) wait time decreased from 46 (32–66) minutes to 45 (31–64) minutes (P=.02), and the percentage of patients who reported long wait time decreased from 7.4% to 5.4% (P=.002).

Conclusion

Our study highlights the feasibility of obtaining timely patient feedback after outpatient MRI and using it to improve patient experience. These results may contribute to the development of more patient-centered care in the field of radiology.
患者调查反馈对改善门诊磁共振成像患者体验的影响
目的探讨门诊磁共振成像(MRI)后及时收集患者反馈的可行性,以及放射科工作人员的反应或行动对患者体验评分的影响。该研究包括6043名患者,他们在2021年4月至2022年9月期间在三级医疗中心接受门诊MRI后通过电子邮件完成了反馈调查。调查包括这样的问题:“你的放射科检查怎么样?”,有一个5分的表情符号李克特量表,一个开放式文本反馈框,以及一个请求回复的选项。分析的主要结局指标是反映患者总体满意度的“顶框”评分(即5/5分的百分比)。为了进行比较,Press Ganey季度顶框评分也被分析,这些顶框评分来自于在研究期间同时接受门诊MRI检查的另一组患者。使用自然语言处理对患者报告的反馈进行分类,并与放射科工作人员的反应和行动一起进行分析。结果“你的放射科检查怎么样?”,从第一个月的81.1%上升到最后一个月的86.1%。类似地,在“放射科工作人员对舒适的关注”和“放射科技术人员的礼貌”相关问题的比较Press Ganey顶框得分从研究的第一季度到最后一季度都有所增加。59.2% (n=3576)的患者报告服务卓越,6.3% (n=383)的患者报告等待时间长,6.1% (n=369)的患者报告沟通不良。与患者互动的工作人员分享了患者的一些赞扬。在所有调查回复中,5.5%需要放射科工作人员的回应或行动,例如与主管分享反馈,向工作人员提供直接反馈,以及给患者打电话。从研究的前半期到后半期,中位(IQR)等待时间从46(32-66)分钟减少到45(31-64)分钟(P= 0.02),报告长等待时间的患者比例从7.4%下降到5.4% (P= 0.002)。结论本研究强调了在门诊MRI后及时获取患者反馈并利用其改善患者体验的可行性。这些结果可能有助于在放射学领域发展更多的以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信