Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mustafa Akıncıoğlu
{"title":"Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation","authors":"Mustafa Akıncıoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>English-medium instruction (EMI) has often been implemented through ill-thought-out institutional/national strategic decisions, typically driven by the internationalisation of higher education. In this context, EMI research seems to be condensed on problem identification and trends, focusing on English language issues, pedagogical challenges, and stakeholder perceptions. This narrow focus appears to have reached a saturation point, underscoring the need for a reform-driven approach—one that prioritises structural transformation and problem-solving. Addressing this gap, this political normative paper argues that the professionalisation of EMI at the tertiary level represents the way forward. Situated within the broader contexts of global capitalism and neoliberalism, this paper takes a Critical EMI stance to examine the role of EMI in higher education. It proposes a structured, solution-oriented approach, grounded in three interrelated critical concepts: multilingualism, universities as sites for liberation, and English as an international language. EMI policy and quality are structured around three cyclic stages, with academic learning outcomes at the core. Rather than offering a rigid framework, this paper introduces the EMI Professionalisation Framework (EMI ProF) as a guiding political normative model informed by prior research to drive the EMI reform and support the professionalisation agenda. Key definitions of EMI quality, professionalisation of EMI, EMI professionals, and EMI content-teacher competence are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English-medium instruction (EMI) has often been implemented through ill-thought-out institutional/national strategic decisions, typically driven by the internationalisation of higher education. In this context, EMI research seems to be condensed on problem identification and trends, focusing on English language issues, pedagogical challenges, and stakeholder perceptions. This narrow focus appears to have reached a saturation point, underscoring the need for a reform-driven approach—one that prioritises structural transformation and problem-solving. Addressing this gap, this political normative paper argues that the professionalisation of EMI at the tertiary level represents the way forward. Situated within the broader contexts of global capitalism and neoliberalism, this paper takes a Critical EMI stance to examine the role of EMI in higher education. It proposes a structured, solution-oriented approach, grounded in three interrelated critical concepts: multilingualism, universities as sites for liberation, and English as an international language. EMI policy and quality are structured around three cyclic stages, with academic learning outcomes at the core. Rather than offering a rigid framework, this paper introduces the EMI Professionalisation Framework (EMI ProF) as a guiding political normative model informed by prior research to drive the EMI reform and support the professionalisation agenda. Key definitions of EMI quality, professionalisation of EMI, EMI professionals, and EMI content-teacher competence are provided.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信