Bridging the gap: Healthcare practitioners' insights on overcoming Telemedicine barriers and optimal strategies for implementation

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Kuan-Chung Wang , Po-Sen Huang , Yu-Lin Wang , Zheng-Yu Hoe , Afaq Ahmed Noor , Peng-Ting Chen
{"title":"Bridging the gap: Healthcare practitioners' insights on overcoming Telemedicine barriers and optimal strategies for implementation","authors":"Kuan-Chung Wang ,&nbsp;Po-Sen Huang ,&nbsp;Yu-Lin Wang ,&nbsp;Zheng-Yu Hoe ,&nbsp;Afaq Ahmed Noor ,&nbsp;Peng-Ting Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of Telemedicine in healthcare delivery. Healthcare practitioners worldwide swiftly embraced Telemedicine to ensure continuous patient care. With the pandemic's decline, the imperative arises to shift from emergency adoption to routine integration. However, past research has failed to comprehensively examine the challenges hindering Telemedicine's widespread adoption for further institutionalizing Telemedicine as a standard healthcare component. This study aims to develop a framework, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for the sustainable integration of Telemedicine into healthcare. Through a comprehensive review of the literature and empirical data, this study delves into strategies for effecting this transition, drawing insights from healthcare practitioners' pandemic experiences, and further illustrating key challenges and barriers to sustainable Telemedicine implementation beyond the pandemic. Utilizing the extended model of Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) and insights from healthcare practitioners in Taiwan, we identify 16 key barriers across four categories: Usage Benefit, Risk Concern, Institutional Support, and Social Influence. Employing the Importance-Acceptance Analysis (IAA) model and the Decision Making and Trial Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, we propose actionable development pathways for Telemedicine implementation. Furthermore, we underscore the pivotal role of healthcare practitioners as primary agents in Telemedicine adoption and provide adaptive strategies to enhance their engagement and support. Implementation of these strategies promises a successful transition of Telemedicine from a temporary measure to an indispensable fixture, thereby augmenting healthcare accessibility, efficiency, and quality in the post-pandemic landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102899"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of Telemedicine in healthcare delivery. Healthcare practitioners worldwide swiftly embraced Telemedicine to ensure continuous patient care. With the pandemic's decline, the imperative arises to shift from emergency adoption to routine integration. However, past research has failed to comprehensively examine the challenges hindering Telemedicine's widespread adoption for further institutionalizing Telemedicine as a standard healthcare component. This study aims to develop a framework, identify obstacles, and propose strategies for the sustainable integration of Telemedicine into healthcare. Through a comprehensive review of the literature and empirical data, this study delves into strategies for effecting this transition, drawing insights from healthcare practitioners' pandemic experiences, and further illustrating key challenges and barriers to sustainable Telemedicine implementation beyond the pandemic. Utilizing the extended model of Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) and insights from healthcare practitioners in Taiwan, we identify 16 key barriers across four categories: Usage Benefit, Risk Concern, Institutional Support, and Social Influence. Employing the Importance-Acceptance Analysis (IAA) model and the Decision Making and Trial Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, we propose actionable development pathways for Telemedicine implementation. Furthermore, we underscore the pivotal role of healthcare practitioners as primary agents in Telemedicine adoption and provide adaptive strategies to enhance their engagement and support. Implementation of these strategies promises a successful transition of Telemedicine from a temporary measure to an indispensable fixture, thereby augmenting healthcare accessibility, efficiency, and quality in the post-pandemic landscape.
缩小差距:医疗从业人员对克服远程医疗障碍和最佳实施策略的见解
2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了远程医疗在医疗保健服务中的关键作用。世界各地的医疗保健从业者迅速接受了远程医疗,以确保持续的患者护理。随着大流行病的减少,当务之急是从紧急采用转向常规整合。然而,过去的研究未能全面审查阻碍远程医疗广泛采用的挑战,以进一步将远程医疗制度化为标准的医疗保健组成部分。本研究旨在建立一个框架,识别障碍,并提出战略的可持续整合远程医疗到医疗保健。通过对文献和经验数据的全面回顾,本研究深入探讨了实现这一转变的策略,从医疗保健从业者的大流行经验中汲取见解,并进一步说明了在大流行之后实施可持续远程医疗的主要挑战和障碍。利用创新阻力理论(IRT)的扩展模型和台湾医疗保健从业者的见解,我们确定了16个主要障碍,分为四类:使用效益、风险关注、机构支持和社会影响。采用重要性-接受度分析(IAA)模型和决策与试验评估实验室(DEMATEL)方法,提出了远程医疗实施的可操作发展路径。此外,我们强调医疗保健从业者作为远程医疗采用的主要代理人的关键作用,并提供适应性策略来增强他们的参与和支持。实施这些战略有望成功地将远程医疗从一项临时措施转变为一项不可或缺的固定设施,从而提高大流行后卫生保健的可及性、效率和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信