Reasons for patient no-shows and drop-offs after initial evaluation in physical therapy outpatient care: a qualitative study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Andrew C. Thomas , Sarah N. Shaver , Jodi L. Young , Chad E. Cook
{"title":"Reasons for patient no-shows and drop-offs after initial evaluation in physical therapy outpatient care: a qualitative study","authors":"Andrew C. Thomas ,&nbsp;Sarah N. Shaver ,&nbsp;Jodi L. Young ,&nbsp;Chad E. Cook","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>No-shows and drop-offs by patients after their initial physical therapy evaluation can significantly impact clinics and therapists. To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the patient's perspective of why they terminated their recommended plan of care after only attending their initial evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To gain insights regarding why patients do not follow through on a recommended physical therapy plan of care after the initial evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative study used semi-structured phone interviews with patients who received a physical therapy evaluation for a musculoskeletal condition within a large regional healthcare system. Participants were purposefully sampled if they attended their initial evaluation, did not attend a follow-up visit within 30 days, and had no future appointments scheduled. After data collection and transcription, coding and thematic analysis took place to establish primary and secondary themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 interviews were conducted, including 12 males and 14 females, with an average age of 51.04 (± 15.72) years. Five common themes emerged, including clinical improvement at an acceptable rate (23.1 %), access issues (26.9 %), did not see value or could do therapy on their own (23.1 %), other medical management was needed (15.4 %), and patient-provider relationship issues (11.5 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the patient's rationale for not following through on a physical therapist's recommended plan of care after an initial evaluation. They may help practice managers and clinicians to proactively address barriers, clinic access issues, and evaluation strategies to maximize the patient's follow-through on their plan of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 103326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225000748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

No-shows and drop-offs by patients after their initial physical therapy evaluation can significantly impact clinics and therapists. To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the patient's perspective of why they terminated their recommended plan of care after only attending their initial evaluation.

Objective

To gain insights regarding why patients do not follow through on a recommended physical therapy plan of care after the initial evaluation.

Methods

This qualitative study used semi-structured phone interviews with patients who received a physical therapy evaluation for a musculoskeletal condition within a large regional healthcare system. Participants were purposefully sampled if they attended their initial evaluation, did not attend a follow-up visit within 30 days, and had no future appointments scheduled. After data collection and transcription, coding and thematic analysis took place to establish primary and secondary themes.

Results

A total of 26 interviews were conducted, including 12 males and 14 females, with an average age of 51.04 (± 15.72) years. Five common themes emerged, including clinical improvement at an acceptable rate (23.1 %), access issues (26.9 %), did not see value or could do therapy on their own (23.1 %), other medical management was needed (15.4 %), and patient-provider relationship issues (11.5 %).

Conclusion

These findings highlight the patient's rationale for not following through on a physical therapist's recommended plan of care after an initial evaluation. They may help practice managers and clinicians to proactively address barriers, clinic access issues, and evaluation strategies to maximize the patient's follow-through on their plan of care.
物理治疗门诊初步评估后患者缺席及退诊的原因:一项定性研究
背景患者在初次理疗评估后不参加治疗或中途放弃治疗,会对诊所和治疗师造成很大影响。据我们所知,以前的研究还没有从患者的角度研究过他们为什么只参加了初次评估就终止了推荐的治疗计划。 Objective To gain insights about why patients do not follow through on a recommended physical therapy plan of care after the initial evaluation.方法这项定性研究采用半结构化电话访谈的方式,在一个大型地区医疗保健系统中对接受过肌肉骨骼状况理疗评估的患者进行访谈。如果参与者参加了初次评估,但在 30 天内没有参加随访,并且没有安排未来的预约,则会被有目的地抽样。在数据收集和转录后,进行了编码和主题分析,以确定主要和次要主题。结果共进行了 26 次访谈,包括 12 名男性和 14 名女性,平均年龄为 51.04 (± 15.72)岁。结果共进行了 26 次访谈,包括 12 名男性和 14 名女性,平均年龄为 51.04 岁(± 15.72 岁)。访谈中出现了五个共同主题,包括临床改善率在可接受范围内(23.1%)、就医问题(26.9%)、看不到治疗价值或无法自行治疗(23.1%)、需要其他医疗管理(15.4%)和患者与医疗服务提供者的关系问题(11.5%)。这些结果可能有助于诊所经理和临床医生积极解决障碍、诊所准入问题和评估策略,以最大限度地提高患者对护理计划的跟进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信