Effects of the buy-online-and-assemble-in-store approach: Implications for firms, consumers, and environment

Guanxiang Zhang, Xiangzhen Meng, Lipan Feng, Qi Kou
{"title":"Effects of the buy-online-and-assemble-in-store approach: Implications for firms, consumers, and environment","authors":"Guanxiang Zhang,&nbsp;Xiangzhen Meng,&nbsp;Lipan Feng,&nbsp;Qi Kou","doi":"10.1016/j.susoc.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The buy-online-and-assemble-in-store (BOAS) approach has been implemented by different contemporary firms (i.e. IKEA and TUHU); however, the implications of BOAS for firms, consumers, and environment remain unclear. To fill this gap, this study considers a monopolistic firm selling products that require consumers’ post-processing assembly for effective use. Two distinct consumer segments exist in the market, including professional and amateur consumers, each with unique product needs and processing capabilities. Furthermore, this study analyses two strategies in which the BOAS channel is introduced or not. We build a game-theoretic model to analyse the impact of the BOAS channel on firms’ optimal decisions, profits and consumer surplus. The findings demonstrate that implementing the BOAS channel in some circumstances will reduce the total demand for the product, although it may increase demand from professional or amateur consumers independently. Moreover, introducing the BOAS channel has various effects on the firm and consumer surplus depending on some critical parameters, including the distribution of consumer types and product handling costs. Particularly, a larger proportion of professional consumers can incentivise firms to adopt the BOAS channel, while higher handling or travelling costs may lead firms to avoid its use. In terms of consumer surplus, although the introduction of BOAS channels appears to enhance amateur consumers’ experience, it may hurt the total consumer surplus in some cases. Finally, we also discussed the impact of BOAS on sustainable operations and found that by centralising the final assembly or customisation of products, the introduction of the BOAS channel can optimise the use of resources, reduce material wastage and improve efficiency. This study significantly contributes to the existing body of knowledge by elucidating the nuanced effects of BOAS on firm strategies and sustainability, providing actionable insights for practitioners navigating the complex omni-channel landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101201,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412725000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The buy-online-and-assemble-in-store (BOAS) approach has been implemented by different contemporary firms (i.e. IKEA and TUHU); however, the implications of BOAS for firms, consumers, and environment remain unclear. To fill this gap, this study considers a monopolistic firm selling products that require consumers’ post-processing assembly for effective use. Two distinct consumer segments exist in the market, including professional and amateur consumers, each with unique product needs and processing capabilities. Furthermore, this study analyses two strategies in which the BOAS channel is introduced or not. We build a game-theoretic model to analyse the impact of the BOAS channel on firms’ optimal decisions, profits and consumer surplus. The findings demonstrate that implementing the BOAS channel in some circumstances will reduce the total demand for the product, although it may increase demand from professional or amateur consumers independently. Moreover, introducing the BOAS channel has various effects on the firm and consumer surplus depending on some critical parameters, including the distribution of consumer types and product handling costs. Particularly, a larger proportion of professional consumers can incentivise firms to adopt the BOAS channel, while higher handling or travelling costs may lead firms to avoid its use. In terms of consumer surplus, although the introduction of BOAS channels appears to enhance amateur consumers’ experience, it may hurt the total consumer surplus in some cases. Finally, we also discussed the impact of BOAS on sustainable operations and found that by centralising the final assembly or customisation of products, the introduction of the BOAS channel can optimise the use of resources, reduce material wastage and improve efficiency. This study significantly contributes to the existing body of knowledge by elucidating the nuanced effects of BOAS on firm strategies and sustainability, providing actionable insights for practitioners navigating the complex omni-channel landscape.
网上购买和店内组装方式的影响:对公司、消费者和环境的影响
在线购买和店内组装(BOAS)的方法已经被不同的当代公司(如宜家和TUHU)实施;然而,BOAS对企业、消费者和环境的影响仍不清楚。为了填补这一空白,本研究考虑了一家垄断企业销售的产品需要消费者的后处理组装才能有效使用。市场上存在两种截然不同的消费群体,包括专业消费者和业余消费者,每种消费者都有独特的产品需求和加工能力。此外,本研究还分析了是否引入BOAS渠道的两种策略。本文建立了博弈论模型,分析了BOAS渠道对企业最优决策、利润和消费者剩余的影响。研究结果表明,在某些情况下,实施BOAS渠道将减少对产品的总需求,尽管它可能会增加专业或业余消费者的需求。此外,引入BOAS渠道对企业和消费者剩余有不同的影响,这取决于一些关键参数,包括消费者类型的分布和产品处理成本。特别是,较大比例的专业消费者可以激励公司采用BOAS渠道,而较高的处理或差旅成本可能导致公司避免使用它。在消费者剩余方面,虽然BOAS渠道的引入似乎增强了业余消费者的体验,但在某些情况下可能会损害总消费者剩余。最后,我们还讨论了BOAS对可持续运营的影响,并发现通过集中产品的最终组装或定制,引入BOAS渠道可以优化资源利用,减少材料浪费并提高效率。本研究通过阐明BOAS对企业战略和可持续性的细微影响,对现有的知识体系做出了重大贡献,为从业者在复杂的全渠道环境中导航提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信