Diagnostic yield of 24 to 48-hour ambulatory cardiac monitoring in discharged emergency department patients

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of Holter monitoring at Emergency Department (ED) discharge.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients discharged from the Mayo Clinic Emergency Department with a 3- or 12‑lead, 24- or 48-h Holter monitor from January 2, 2017 through April 30, 2018. Each case was assigned into one of four diagnostic classifications: symptomatic, negative Holter; silent arrhythmia; symptomatic arrythmia; or no symptoms, negative Holter.

Results

491 patients were included in this study. The most common presenting chief complaints were palpitations (31.4 %), syncope (11.8 %), chest pain (8.8 %) and lightheadedness (8.4 %). Overall diagnostic yield for ED Holter monitoring was 68.2 % (CI: 63.9–72.3), which included results that would impact either diagnosis, management, and/or follow-up. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between the 24- and 48-h monitoring durations (66.9 % vs 70.7 %, respectively; p = 0.39). Patients aged 61–95 years were most likely to have a diagnostic monitor at 77.6 % (n = 152/196; CI: 71.1–83.2). A total of 50.5 % (n = 248/491) patients reported symptoms during their monitoring period. Significant arrhythmias were detected in 37.3 %, (n = 183/491) of patients. There were no patient deaths during or within 30 days after use.

Conclusions

The practice of discharging low risk ED patients with a Holter monitor has high diagnostic utility and is safe. Holter monitors allow for continuation of the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting to the ED with symptoms potentially concerning for cardiac arrythmia deemed safe for discharge.