Does blockchain-enabled quality inspection work better in hybrid retailing?

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Cuihua Zhang , Xiufang Li , Henry Xu , Zhitang Li , Xiangru Zhao
{"title":"Does blockchain-enabled quality inspection work better in hybrid retailing?","authors":"Cuihua Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiufang Li ,&nbsp;Henry Xu ,&nbsp;Zhitang Li ,&nbsp;Xiangru Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.111092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of e-commerce platforms has driven brand owners to expand their markets through hybrid retailing, i.e., the cooperation of an incumbent seller and an agent seller to sell products. However, achieving effective quality control remains a significant challenge for brand owners. Compared with conventional quality inspection (CQI), blockchain-enabled quality inspection (BQI) is a promising solution to address quality control issues such as inspection errors and the invisibility of production processes. The main objective of this paper is to investigate how to make an optimal strategy choice between BQI and CQI. We consider a supply chain involving a supplier and a brand owner and take a game-theoretic approach to analyze the two players’ preferences for quality control strategies and the impact of hybrid retailing on their strategy preferences. The results suggest that when the quality cost coefficient is small, the quality of the components will be high or even perfect. In this case, the brand owner should implement the no-inspection policy under the CQI strategy. When the quality cost coefficient is at a medium level, the brand owner can choose the BQI strategy to avoid, to a certain extent, the supplier’s strategic input quality decision-making behavior. Moreover, as the quality cost coefficient rises, the external failure cost increases, or the blockchain adoption cost decreases, the BQI strategy is more favorable to the supplier and the brand owner than the CQI strategy. Furthermore, introducing hybrid retailing benefits the supplier and the brand owner when the market size of the external sales platform is large. However, introducing hybrid retailing increases the supplier’s and brand owner’s preference for the no-inspection policy and reduces their preference for the full-inspection policy and the BQI strategy. Our research findings provide guidance for brand owners and suppliers to choose appropriate quality control strategies and offer a theoretical basis for them to make quality and pricing decisions in actual operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 111092"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225002384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of e-commerce platforms has driven brand owners to expand their markets through hybrid retailing, i.e., the cooperation of an incumbent seller and an agent seller to sell products. However, achieving effective quality control remains a significant challenge for brand owners. Compared with conventional quality inspection (CQI), blockchain-enabled quality inspection (BQI) is a promising solution to address quality control issues such as inspection errors and the invisibility of production processes. The main objective of this paper is to investigate how to make an optimal strategy choice between BQI and CQI. We consider a supply chain involving a supplier and a brand owner and take a game-theoretic approach to analyze the two players’ preferences for quality control strategies and the impact of hybrid retailing on their strategy preferences. The results suggest that when the quality cost coefficient is small, the quality of the components will be high or even perfect. In this case, the brand owner should implement the no-inspection policy under the CQI strategy. When the quality cost coefficient is at a medium level, the brand owner can choose the BQI strategy to avoid, to a certain extent, the supplier’s strategic input quality decision-making behavior. Moreover, as the quality cost coefficient rises, the external failure cost increases, or the blockchain adoption cost decreases, the BQI strategy is more favorable to the supplier and the brand owner than the CQI strategy. Furthermore, introducing hybrid retailing benefits the supplier and the brand owner when the market size of the external sales platform is large. However, introducing hybrid retailing increases the supplier’s and brand owner’s preference for the no-inspection policy and reduces their preference for the full-inspection policy and the BQI strategy. Our research findings provide guidance for brand owners and suppliers to choose appropriate quality control strategies and offer a theoretical basis for them to make quality and pricing decisions in actual operations.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信