Comprehensive Characterization of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Specificity, Potency, and Biological Effects: Insights into Covalent and Noncovalent Mechanistic Signatures

IF 4.9 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Antonia C. Darragh, Andrew M. Hanna, Justin H. Lipner, Alastair J. King, Nicole B. Servant and Mirza Jahic*, 
{"title":"Comprehensive Characterization of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Specificity, Potency, and Biological Effects: Insights into Covalent and Noncovalent Mechanistic Signatures","authors":"Antonia C. Darragh,&nbsp;Andrew M. Hanna,&nbsp;Justin H. Lipner,&nbsp;Alastair J. King,&nbsp;Nicole B. Servant and Mirza Jahic*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsptsci.4c0054010.1021/acsptsci.4c00540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Uncovering a drug’s mechanism of action and possible adverse effects are critical components in drug discovery and development. Moreover, it provides evidence for why some drugs prove more effective than others and how to design better drugs altogether. Here, we demonstrate the utility of a high-throughput <i>in vitro</i> screening platform along with a comprehensive panel to aid in the characterization of 15 Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors that are either approved by the FDA or presently under clinical evaluation. To compare the potency of these drugs, we measured the binding affinity of each to wild-type BTK as well as a clinically relevant resistance mutant of BTK (BTK C481S). In doing so, we discovered a considerable difference in the selectivity and potency of these BTK inhibitors to the wild-type and mutant proteins. Some of this potentially contributes to the adverse effects experienced by patients undergoing therapy using these drugs. Overall, noncovalent BTK inhibitors showed stronger potency for both the wild-type and mutant BTK when compared with that of covalent inhibitors, with the majority demonstrating a higher specificity and less off-target modulation. Additionally, we compared biological outcomes for four of these inhibitors in human cell-based models. As expected, we found different phenotypic profiles for each inhibitor. However, the two noncovalent inhibitors had fewer off-target biological effects when compared with the two covalent inhibitors. This and similar in-depth preclinical characterization of drug candidates can provide critical insights into the efficacy and mechanism of action of a compound that may affect its safety in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36426,"journal":{"name":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","volume":"8 4","pages":"917–931 917–931"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsptsci.4c00540","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.4c00540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncovering a drug’s mechanism of action and possible adverse effects are critical components in drug discovery and development. Moreover, it provides evidence for why some drugs prove more effective than others and how to design better drugs altogether. Here, we demonstrate the utility of a high-throughput in vitro screening platform along with a comprehensive panel to aid in the characterization of 15 Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors that are either approved by the FDA or presently under clinical evaluation. To compare the potency of these drugs, we measured the binding affinity of each to wild-type BTK as well as a clinically relevant resistance mutant of BTK (BTK C481S). In doing so, we discovered a considerable difference in the selectivity and potency of these BTK inhibitors to the wild-type and mutant proteins. Some of this potentially contributes to the adverse effects experienced by patients undergoing therapy using these drugs. Overall, noncovalent BTK inhibitors showed stronger potency for both the wild-type and mutant BTK when compared with that of covalent inhibitors, with the majority demonstrating a higher specificity and less off-target modulation. Additionally, we compared biological outcomes for four of these inhibitors in human cell-based models. As expected, we found different phenotypic profiles for each inhibitor. However, the two noncovalent inhibitors had fewer off-target biological effects when compared with the two covalent inhibitors. This and similar in-depth preclinical characterization of drug candidates can provide critical insights into the efficacy and mechanism of action of a compound that may affect its safety in a clinical setting.

布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂特异性、效力和生物学效应的综合表征:共价和非共价机制特征的见解
揭示药物的作用机制和可能的不良反应是药物发现和开发的关键组成部分。此外,它还提供了证据,说明为什么有些药物比其他药物更有效,以及如何设计更好的药物。在这里,我们展示了高通量体外筛选平台的实用性,以及一个全面的面板,以帮助表征15种布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂,这些抑制剂要么已获得FDA批准,要么正在临床评估中。为了比较这些药物的效力,我们测量了每种药物与野生型BTK以及临床相关的BTK耐药突变体(BTK C481S)的结合亲和力。在这样做的过程中,我们发现这些BTK抑制剂对野生型和突变蛋白的选择性和效力有相当大的差异。其中一些可能会导致使用这些药物进行治疗的患者所经历的不良反应。总的来说,与共价抑制剂相比,非共价BTK抑制剂对野生型和突变型BTK都表现出更强的效力,大多数表现出更高的特异性和更少的脱靶调节。此外,我们比较了四种抑制剂在人类细胞模型中的生物学结果。正如预期的那样,我们发现每种抑制剂具有不同的表型特征。然而,与两种共价抑制剂相比,两种非共价抑制剂具有更少的脱靶生物学效应。这种和类似的对候选药物的深入临床前表征可以为化合物的疗效和作用机制提供关键的见解,这可能会影响其在临床环境中的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science
ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science publishes high quality, innovative, and impactful research across the broad spectrum of biological sciences, covering basic and molecular sciences through to translational preclinical studies. Clinical studies that address novel mechanisms of action, and methodological papers that provide innovation, and advance translation, will also be considered. We give priority to studies that fully integrate basic pharmacological and/or biochemical findings into physiological processes that have translational potential in a broad range of biomedical disciplines. Therefore, studies that employ a complementary blend of in vitro and in vivo systems are of particular interest to the journal. Nonetheless, all innovative and impactful research that has an articulated translational relevance will be considered. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science does not publish research on biological extracts that have unknown concentration or unknown chemical composition. Authors are encouraged to use the pre-submission inquiry mechanism to ensure relevance and appropriateness of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信