How Do Radiologists Currently Monitor AI in Radiology and What Challenges Do They Face? An Interview Study and Qualitative Analysis.

Jamie Chow, Ryan Lee, Honghan Wu
{"title":"How Do Radiologists Currently Monitor AI in Radiology and What Challenges Do They Face? An Interview Study and Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Jamie Chow, Ryan Lee, Honghan Wu","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01493-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology is becoming increasingly prevalent; however, there is not a clear picture of how AI is being monitored today and how this should practically be done given the inherent risk of AI model performance degradation over time. This research investigates current practices and what difficulties radiologists face in monitoring AI. Semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted with 6 USA and 10 Europe-based radiologists. The interviews were automatically transcribed and underwent thematic analysis. The findings suggest that AI monitoring in radiology is still relatively nascent as most of the AI projects had not yet progressed into a fully live clinical deployment. The most common method of monitoring involved a manual process of retrospectively comparing the AI results against the radiology report. Automated and statistical methods of monitoring were much less common. The biggest challenges are a lack of resources to support AI monitoring and uncertainty about how to create a robust and scalable process of monitoring the breadth and variety of radiology AI applications available. There is currently a lack of practical guidelines on how to monitor AI which has led to a variety of approaches being proposed from both healthcare providers and vendors. An ensemble of mixed methods is recommended to monitor AI across multiple domains and metrics. This will be enabled by appropriate allocation of resources and the formation of robust and diverse multidisciplinary AI governance groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01493-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology is becoming increasingly prevalent; however, there is not a clear picture of how AI is being monitored today and how this should practically be done given the inherent risk of AI model performance degradation over time. This research investigates current practices and what difficulties radiologists face in monitoring AI. Semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted with 6 USA and 10 Europe-based radiologists. The interviews were automatically transcribed and underwent thematic analysis. The findings suggest that AI monitoring in radiology is still relatively nascent as most of the AI projects had not yet progressed into a fully live clinical deployment. The most common method of monitoring involved a manual process of retrospectively comparing the AI results against the radiology report. Automated and statistical methods of monitoring were much less common. The biggest challenges are a lack of resources to support AI monitoring and uncertainty about how to create a robust and scalable process of monitoring the breadth and variety of radiology AI applications available. There is currently a lack of practical guidelines on how to monitor AI which has led to a variety of approaches being proposed from both healthcare providers and vendors. An ensemble of mixed methods is recommended to monitor AI across multiple domains and metrics. This will be enabled by appropriate allocation of resources and the formation of robust and diverse multidisciplinary AI governance groups.

放射科医生目前如何监控放射学中的人工智能?他们面临哪些挑战?访谈研究与定性分析。
人工智能(AI)在放射学中的应用越来越普遍;然而,鉴于人工智能模型性能随着时间的推移而下降的固有风险,目前尚不清楚人工智能是如何被监控的,也不清楚应该如何实际做到这一点。本研究调查了目前的做法以及放射科医生在监测人工智能方面面临的困难。对6名美国和10名欧洲的放射科医生进行了半结构化的虚拟访谈。访谈内容被自动抄录并进行专题分析。研究结果表明,放射学中的人工智能监测仍处于相对初级阶段,因为大多数人工智能项目尚未发展到完全现场临床部署。最常见的监测方法是手动将人工智能结果与放射报告进行回顾性比较。自动化和统计监测方法则不太常见。最大的挑战是缺乏支持人工智能监测的资源,以及如何创建一个强大且可扩展的流程来监测可用放射学人工智能应用的广度和多样性的不确定性。目前缺乏关于如何监测人工智能的实用指南,这导致医疗保健提供者和供应商提出了各种方法。建议使用混合方法的集合来跨多个领域和度量监视AI。这将通过适当分配资源和组建强大和多样化的多学科人工智能治理小组来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信