Democratizing care to care for democracy: community care workers and anti-racist public health.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf052
Raeghn Draper, Eric Reinhart
{"title":"Democratizing care to care for democracy: community care workers and anti-racist public health.","authors":"Raeghn Draper, Eric Reinhart","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The organization of care in the United States reflects a longstanding prioritization of medical interventions over broader social support systems. This has contributed to widening racial and class inequalities alongside poor health outcomes, weakened communities, and growing social isolation that has created fertile ground for rising authoritarianism. Following on Roy, Hamilton, and Chokshi (2024), who argue for the necessity of addressing the interconnected areas of capital, care, and culture to rebuild US public health, we outline how public investment in community care worker systems can address each of these areas by strengthening their synergistic overlaps and reframing the function of care in society. By recruiting residents of disinvested communities into career positions as publicly employed care workers in their own neighborhoods, such a program would implement a genuinely anti-racist model of public health. This approach is rooted in training and properly compensating members of disenfranchised communities to care for one another rather than perpetuating classist and racist models of care in which reliance on external actors is presumed necessary. By insisting on policies that support the essential interpersonal and political-economic functions of care as public infrastructure, care can obtain a collective ethical and spiritual significance beyond its material effects alone. Implementing community care programs designed to reanimate care in this way could not only dramatically improve health but also revitalize the twinned projects of American democracy and racial equality in a period during which both are under intensifying threat.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 4","pages":"qxaf052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organization of care in the United States reflects a longstanding prioritization of medical interventions over broader social support systems. This has contributed to widening racial and class inequalities alongside poor health outcomes, weakened communities, and growing social isolation that has created fertile ground for rising authoritarianism. Following on Roy, Hamilton, and Chokshi (2024), who argue for the necessity of addressing the interconnected areas of capital, care, and culture to rebuild US public health, we outline how public investment in community care worker systems can address each of these areas by strengthening their synergistic overlaps and reframing the function of care in society. By recruiting residents of disinvested communities into career positions as publicly employed care workers in their own neighborhoods, such a program would implement a genuinely anti-racist model of public health. This approach is rooted in training and properly compensating members of disenfranchised communities to care for one another rather than perpetuating classist and racist models of care in which reliance on external actors is presumed necessary. By insisting on policies that support the essential interpersonal and political-economic functions of care as public infrastructure, care can obtain a collective ethical and spiritual significance beyond its material effects alone. Implementing community care programs designed to reanimate care in this way could not only dramatically improve health but also revitalize the twinned projects of American democracy and racial equality in a period during which both are under intensifying threat.

民主化护理为民主护理:社区护理工作者和反种族主义公共卫生。
美国的护理组织反映了长期以来医疗干预优先于更广泛的社会支持系统。这导致了种族和阶级不平等的扩大,健康状况不佳,社区被削弱,社会孤立加剧,为威权主义的崛起创造了肥沃的土壤。Roy、Hamilton和Chokshi(2024)认为有必要解决资本、护理和文化等相互关联的领域,以重建美国公共卫生。在此基础上,我们概述了社区护理工作者系统的公共投资如何通过加强它们的协同重叠和重构社会护理的功能来解决这些领域的问题。通过招募投资不足社区的居民在他们自己的社区担任公共雇佣的护理人员,这样的项目将实施一个真正反种族主义的公共卫生模式。这种做法的根源在于培训和适当补偿被剥夺公民权的社区成员互相照顾,而不是使阶级主义和种族主义的照顾模式永久化,这种模式认为必须依赖外部行动者。通过坚持支持护理作为公共基础设施的基本人际和政治经济功能的政策,护理可以获得超越其物质效果的集体伦理和精神意义。实施旨在以这种方式重振护理的社区护理项目,不仅可以显著改善健康状况,还可以在美国民主和种族平等这两个孪生项目受到日益严重威胁的时期重振这两个项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信