Telehealth or in-person HIV care? Qualitative study findings on decision-making from people with HIV and HIV care providers in South Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Valerie Yelverton, Salome-Joelle Gass, Daniel Amoatika, Christopher Cooke, Jan Ostermann, Nabil Natafgi, Nicole L Hair, Bankole Olatosi, Otis L Owens, Shan Qiao, Xiaoming Li, Caroline Derrick, Sharon Weissman, Helmut Albrecht
{"title":"Telehealth or in-person HIV care? Qualitative study findings on decision-making from people with HIV and HIV care providers in South Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Valerie Yelverton, Salome-Joelle Gass, Daniel Amoatika, Christopher Cooke, Jan Ostermann, Nabil Natafgi, Nicole L Hair, Bankole Olatosi, Otis L Owens, Shan Qiao, Xiaoming Li, Caroline Derrick, Sharon Weissman, Helmut Albrecht","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted HIV care services across the United States. Telehealth was rapidly implemented to ensure HIV care continuity. Despite the evidence of unequal telehealth uptake among some people with HIV (PWH), the decision-making processes to determine who received telehealth or in-person care are under-researched. This study assessed which decision criteria and processes determined which HIV care visit type was used by PWH and HIV care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 18 PWH and 10 HIV care providers from South Carolina assessed PWHs' and HIV care providers' decision-making criteria and processes for telehealth HIV care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Most PWH (11 out of 18) and all providers had used telehealth for HIV care. To guide visit type decisions, interviewees reported decision-making criteria across four domains: patient-related criteria, clinical criteria, provider preference, and HIV care continuity. Patient-related criteria included patient preference, convenience, fear of COVID-19 exposure and stigma, and transportation barriers. Clinical criteria included the need for a physical exam, a person's care history and health status. While all identified decision criteria were important, we found a hierarchical structure: care continuity superseded other criteria. Some clinical criteria were reported as decision-relevant criteria by providers but not PWH. Most PWH reported that they were included or took the lead in the visit type decision process. Decision-making processes to determine PWHs' HIV care visit types considered criteria across multiple domains. The superseding criteria was to sustain HIV care continuity. To guide future telehealth use, shared decision-making is needed to weigh patient-related, provider-related, and clinical decision criteria and maintain care continuity, and to comprehensively include all relevant decision criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 4","pages":"e0000812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted HIV care services across the United States. Telehealth was rapidly implemented to ensure HIV care continuity. Despite the evidence of unequal telehealth uptake among some people with HIV (PWH), the decision-making processes to determine who received telehealth or in-person care are under-researched. This study assessed which decision criteria and processes determined which HIV care visit type was used by PWH and HIV care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 18 PWH and 10 HIV care providers from South Carolina assessed PWHs' and HIV care providers' decision-making criteria and processes for telehealth HIV care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Most PWH (11 out of 18) and all providers had used telehealth for HIV care. To guide visit type decisions, interviewees reported decision-making criteria across four domains: patient-related criteria, clinical criteria, provider preference, and HIV care continuity. Patient-related criteria included patient preference, convenience, fear of COVID-19 exposure and stigma, and transportation barriers. Clinical criteria included the need for a physical exam, a person's care history and health status. While all identified decision criteria were important, we found a hierarchical structure: care continuity superseded other criteria. Some clinical criteria were reported as decision-relevant criteria by providers but not PWH. Most PWH reported that they were included or took the lead in the visit type decision process. Decision-making processes to determine PWHs' HIV care visit types considered criteria across multiple domains. The superseding criteria was to sustain HIV care continuity. To guide future telehealth use, shared decision-making is needed to weigh patient-related, provider-related, and clinical decision criteria and maintain care continuity, and to comprehensively include all relevant decision criteria.
远程保健还是面对面的艾滋病护理?COVID-19 大流行期间南卡罗来纳州 HIV 感染者和 HIV 护理提供者的决策定性研究结果。
COVID-19 大流行扰乱了美国各地的艾滋病护理服务。为确保艾滋病护理的连续性,远程保健被迅速实施。尽管有证据表明一些 HIV 感染者(PWH)对远程医疗的接受程度不平等,但对决定谁接受远程医疗或面对面医疗的决策过程研究不足。本研究评估了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,哪些决策标准和流程决定了 PWH 和 HIV 护理提供者使用哪种 HIV 护理就诊类型。对南卡罗来纳州的 18 名公共卫生人员和 10 名艾滋病护理提供者进行了定性深入访谈,评估了公共卫生人员和艾滋病护理提供者在 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗艾滋病护理的决策标准和流程。采用主题分析法对访谈进行了分析。大多数 PWH(18 人中有 11 人)和所有提供者都使用过远程医疗进行 HIV 护理。为指导就诊类型决策,受访者报告了四个领域的决策标准:患者相关标准、临床标准、提供者偏好和 HIV 护理连续性。患者相关标准包括患者偏好、便利性、对 COVID-19 暴露和污名化的恐惧以及交通障碍。临床标准包括体检需求、个人护理史和健康状况。虽然所有已确定的决策标准都很重要,但我们发现了一个等级结构:护理的连续性高于其他标准。一些临床标准被医疗服务提供者报告为与决策相关的标准,但却没有被威利斯人报告为与决策相关的标准。大多数威利斯人报告说,在就诊类型的决策过程中,他们参与或主导了决策。确定 PWH 的 HIV 护理就诊类型的决策过程考虑了多个领域的标准。首要标准是保持 HIV 护理的连续性。为了指导未来远程医疗的使用,需要共同决策来权衡患者相关、提供者相关和临床决策标准,保持护理的连续性,并全面纳入所有相关决策标准。