Time to Enhancement of Foci Relative to Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Ultrafast Breast MRI: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Helaina C Regen-Tuero, Yiming Gao, Xiaochun Li, Ariella Noorily, Judith D Goldberg, Samantha L Heller
{"title":"Time to Enhancement of Foci Relative to Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Ultrafast Breast MRI: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Helaina C Regen-Tuero, Yiming Gao, Xiaochun Li, Ariella Noorily, Judith D Goldberg, Samantha L Heller","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.32309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND</b> - Breast MRI is a sensitive tool for detecting small cancers. However, differentiating benign and malignant lesions remains challenging, particularly for foci. Studies evaluating other lesion types have identified ultrafast MRI (UFMRI) parameters associated with malignancy. <b>OBJECTIVE</b> - The purpose of this study was to determine if kinetic features of UFMRI can differentiate malignant and nonmalignant foci. <b>METHODS</b> - In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive UFMRI examinations performed from July 2019 to April 2023 with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy of a focus were selected. Patient characteristics and lesion features were collected from the EMR, imaging reports, and imaging review. Focus and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) time to enhancement (TTE), and the difference between them was calculated. Associations with malignancy were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. <b>RESULTS</b> - A total of 124 patients (mean age, 53 years old; range, 29-78 years old) underwent biopsy of 124 foci. Sixty-four (51.6%) were postmenopausal, 71 (57.3%) had a personal history of breast cancer, 81 (65.3%) had a family history of breast cancer, and 33/94 (35.3%) had genetic mutations. Most examinations were performed for extent of disease evaluation (47.6%; 59/124), followed by screening (41.9%; 52/124). Patients predominantly had heterogeneous fibroglandular tissue (58.1%; 72/124) and mild BPE (57.3%; 71/124). Of 124 lesions, 21 (16.9%) were malignant, 16 were invasive, and five were ductal carcinoma in situ. Odds of malignancy increased 5% with each 1-second increase in the difference of lesion TTE and BPE TTE (95% CI: 2-9%, p = .006). Older age and lower BPE were associated with increased likelihood of malignancy (p = .005 and p = .02, respectively). Odds of malignancy for patients with minimal or mild BPE were 11.69 times the odds of those with moderate or marked BPE (95% CI: 1.51-90.67). No other demographic or lesion characteristics were predictive of malignancy. <b>CONCLUSION</b> - Earlier visualization of a focus relative to BPE on UFMRI was associated with increased likelihood of malignancy; morphologic features showed no association with malignancy. <b>CLINICAL IMPACT</b> - The difference of TTE of a focus compared with that of BPE may be a useful parameter for assessing malignancy, which could help reduce unnecessary biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.32309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND - Breast MRI is a sensitive tool for detecting small cancers. However, differentiating benign and malignant lesions remains challenging, particularly for foci. Studies evaluating other lesion types have identified ultrafast MRI (UFMRI) parameters associated with malignancy. OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to determine if kinetic features of UFMRI can differentiate malignant and nonmalignant foci. METHODS - In this single-center retrospective study, consecutive UFMRI examinations performed from July 2019 to April 2023 with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy of a focus were selected. Patient characteristics and lesion features were collected from the EMR, imaging reports, and imaging review. Focus and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) time to enhancement (TTE), and the difference between them was calculated. Associations with malignancy were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS - A total of 124 patients (mean age, 53 years old; range, 29-78 years old) underwent biopsy of 124 foci. Sixty-four (51.6%) were postmenopausal, 71 (57.3%) had a personal history of breast cancer, 81 (65.3%) had a family history of breast cancer, and 33/94 (35.3%) had genetic mutations. Most examinations were performed for extent of disease evaluation (47.6%; 59/124), followed by screening (41.9%; 52/124). Patients predominantly had heterogeneous fibroglandular tissue (58.1%; 72/124) and mild BPE (57.3%; 71/124). Of 124 lesions, 21 (16.9%) were malignant, 16 were invasive, and five were ductal carcinoma in situ. Odds of malignancy increased 5% with each 1-second increase in the difference of lesion TTE and BPE TTE (95% CI: 2-9%, p = .006). Older age and lower BPE were associated with increased likelihood of malignancy (p = .005 and p = .02, respectively). Odds of malignancy for patients with minimal or mild BPE were 11.69 times the odds of those with moderate or marked BPE (95% CI: 1.51-90.67). No other demographic or lesion characteristics were predictive of malignancy. CONCLUSION - Earlier visualization of a focus relative to BPE on UFMRI was associated with increased likelihood of malignancy; morphologic features showed no association with malignancy. CLINICAL IMPACT - The difference of TTE of a focus compared with that of BPE may be a useful parameter for assessing malignancy, which could help reduce unnecessary biopsies.

超快乳腺MRI上病灶增强相对于背景实质增强的时间:一项单中心回顾性研究。
背景-乳腺MRI是一种检测小肿瘤的灵敏工具。然而,鉴别良性和恶性病变仍然具有挑战性,特别是灶性病变。评估其他病变类型的研究已经确定了与恶性肿瘤相关的超快MRI (UFMRI)参数。目的:本研究的目的是确定UFMRI的动力学特征是否可以区分恶性和非恶性病灶。方法:在这项单中心回顾性研究中,选择了2019年7月至2023年4月期间连续进行的UFMRI检查,随后进行mri引导下的病灶活检。从EMR、影像学报告和影像学回顾中收集患者特征和病变特征。计算焦点和背景实质增强(BPE)与增强时间(TTE)的差值。通过单变量和多变量logistic回归评估与恶性肿瘤的相关性。结果:共124例患者(平均年龄53岁;患者年龄29-78岁,接受124个病灶活检。绝经后64例(51.6%),有乳腺癌个人病史71例(57.3%),有乳腺癌家族史81例(65.3%),有基因突变33/94例(35.3%)。大多数检查是为了评估疾病程度(47.6%;59/124),其次是筛选(41.9%;52/124)。患者主要为异质性纤维腺组织(58.1%;72/124)和轻度BPE (57.3%;71/124)。124例病变中,恶性21例(16.9%),浸润性16例,导管原位癌5例。病变TTE与BPE TTE的差异每增加1秒,恶性肿瘤的几率增加5% (95% CI: 2-9%, p = 0.006)。老年和低BPE与恶性肿瘤的可能性增加相关(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.02)。轻度或轻度BPE患者发生恶性肿瘤的几率是中度或明显BPE患者的11.69倍(95% CI: 1.51-90.67)。没有其他人口统计学或病变特征预测恶性肿瘤。结论:早期在UFMRI上发现病灶与BPE相关,与恶性肿瘤的可能性增加有关;形态学特征显示与恶性肿瘤无关联。临床影响-病灶TTE与BPE的差异可能是评估恶性肿瘤的有用参数,有助于减少不必要的活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信