Feasibility of a mind-body activity program for English and Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain delivered within shared medical visits in a community clinic.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Katherine A McDermott, Claire L Szapary, Elizabeth M Allen, Julie R Brewer, Clara C Vonderheide, Natalia Giraldo-Santiago, Nadine S Levey, Danielle E La Camera, Roger Pasinski, Jonathan Greenberg, Christine S Ritchie, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
{"title":"Feasibility of a mind-body activity program for English and Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain delivered within shared medical visits in a community clinic.","authors":"Katherine A McDermott, Claire L Szapary, Elizabeth M Allen, Julie R Brewer, Clara C Vonderheide, Natalia Giraldo-Santiago, Nadine S Levey, Danielle E La Camera, Roger Pasinski, Jonathan Greenberg, Christine S Ritchie, Ana-Maria Vranceanu","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Underserved older adults with chronic pain receive pain treatment predominantly in primary care. However, these clinics often lack resources and access to evidence-based psychosocial pain management. Shared medical visits, in which patients receive care in a group setting, offer a practical avenue for implementing psychosocial pain management. We conducted an open pilot study with exit interviews (NIH stage 1a) assessing the feasibility of GetActive+, an efficacious mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in a community clinic delivered via shared medical visits.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Twenty English-speaking and thirteen Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain from a community primary care clinic participated in GetActive+. Our a priori set primary outcomes were feasibility (≥ 75% of patients approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥ 75% of patients enrolled complete 8/10 sessions), and fidelity (≥ 75% of session components delivered as intended). We also assessed preliminary quantitative outcomes, including multimodal physical function (ActiGraph, PROMIS physical function, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory; PEG), and emotional function (depression and anxiety symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We exceeded our benchmarks for feasibility (86.8%), acceptability (93.9%) and fidelity (97.9%). Participants demonstrated improvement in self-reported physical function and 6-minute walk test, pain intensity and interference, and depressive symptoms but not in ActiGraph step count or anxiety symptoms. Exit interviews supported the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>GetActive+ exceeded feasibility benchmarks and offers promise in making psychosocial pain management more accessible in the community via group delivery by any available provider.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Underserved older adults with chronic pain receive pain treatment predominantly in primary care. However, these clinics often lack resources and access to evidence-based psychosocial pain management. Shared medical visits, in which patients receive care in a group setting, offer a practical avenue for implementing psychosocial pain management. We conducted an open pilot study with exit interviews (NIH stage 1a) assessing the feasibility of GetActive+, an efficacious mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in a community clinic delivered via shared medical visits.

Research design and methods: Twenty English-speaking and thirteen Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain from a community primary care clinic participated in GetActive+. Our a priori set primary outcomes were feasibility (≥ 75% of patients approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥ 75% of patients enrolled complete 8/10 sessions), and fidelity (≥ 75% of session components delivered as intended). We also assessed preliminary quantitative outcomes, including multimodal physical function (ActiGraph, PROMIS physical function, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory; PEG), and emotional function (depression and anxiety symptoms).

Results: We exceeded our benchmarks for feasibility (86.8%), acceptability (93.9%) and fidelity (97.9%). Participants demonstrated improvement in self-reported physical function and 6-minute walk test, pain intensity and interference, and depressive symptoms but not in ActiGraph step count or anxiety symptoms. Exit interviews supported the quantitative findings.

Discussion and implications: GetActive+ exceeded feasibility benchmarks and offers promise in making psychosocial pain management more accessible in the community via group delivery by any available provider.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信