Antecedents and Outcomes of Physician Coworker Conflict: A Differential Occupational Model for Health Care Managers.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eung Il Kim, Benjamin B Dunford, Wayne Boss, David S Boss
{"title":"Antecedents and Outcomes of Physician Coworker Conflict: A Differential Occupational Model for Health Care Managers.","authors":"Eung Il Kim, Benjamin B Dunford, Wayne Boss, David S Boss","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interpersonal conflict between physicians and their coworkers hinders health care organizations today on an unprecedented scale. Most research on physician conflict has been restricted to 2 occupational groups, nurses and administrators. Yet as health care delivery becomes more complex and interdependent, physician interpersonal conflict impacts all occupational groups. Thus, we seek to provide health care managers with specific guidance about how they might eliminate negative effects of physician-related interpersonal conflict for each occupation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined antecedents and outcomes of physician conflict across 4 occupational groups (office clerical and support staff, professional and technical, nursing, and managerial) in a survey of 1451 US health care employees. Using Multigroup Structural Equations Modeling (MSEM) analysis we estimated each relationship in our model across the 4 occupational groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that workload, perceived HR climate and patient-related incentives predicted physician conflict, and that physician conflict related to burnout, intention to turn over and psychological safety. Most notably, these antecedents and outcomes varied meaningfully across occupational groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These observed differential effects in our results suggest that managers should carefully consider the needs of different occupational groups separately when designing and implementing interventions to prevent and ameliorate physician conflict. In short, the antecedents and outcomes of physician conflict are different for office/clerical, nurses, professional/technical employees, and management groups and therefore require different solutions. In short, it behooves health care organizations to avoid a one size fits all approach to improving workplace relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Interpersonal conflict between physicians and their coworkers hinders health care organizations today on an unprecedented scale. Most research on physician conflict has been restricted to 2 occupational groups, nurses and administrators. Yet as health care delivery becomes more complex and interdependent, physician interpersonal conflict impacts all occupational groups. Thus, we seek to provide health care managers with specific guidance about how they might eliminate negative effects of physician-related interpersonal conflict for each occupation.

Methods: We examined antecedents and outcomes of physician conflict across 4 occupational groups (office clerical and support staff, professional and technical, nursing, and managerial) in a survey of 1451 US health care employees. Using Multigroup Structural Equations Modeling (MSEM) analysis we estimated each relationship in our model across the 4 occupational groups.

Results: We found that workload, perceived HR climate and patient-related incentives predicted physician conflict, and that physician conflict related to burnout, intention to turn over and psychological safety. Most notably, these antecedents and outcomes varied meaningfully across occupational groups.

Conclusions: These observed differential effects in our results suggest that managers should carefully consider the needs of different occupational groups separately when designing and implementing interventions to prevent and ameliorate physician conflict. In short, the antecedents and outcomes of physician conflict are different for office/clerical, nurses, professional/technical employees, and management groups and therefore require different solutions. In short, it behooves health care organizations to avoid a one size fits all approach to improving workplace relationships.

医师同事冲突的前因与结果:医疗保健管理人员的不同职业模式。
目的:当今,医生与其同事之间的人际冲突以前所未有的规模阻碍着医疗机构的发展。有关医生冲突的研究大多局限于护士和行政人员这两个职业群体。然而,随着医疗保健服务变得越来越复杂和相互依存,医生之间的人际冲突会影响到所有职业群体。因此,我们试图为医疗保健管理人员提供具体指导,帮助他们消除与医生相关的人际冲突对各职业的负面影响:我们对 1451 名美国医疗保健雇员进行了调查,研究了 4 个职业组(办公室文员和支持人员、专业技术人员、护理人员和管理人员)中医生冲突的前因后果。通过多组结构方程模型(MSEM)分析,我们估算了 4 个职业组中模型中的每种关系:结果:我们发现,工作量、感知到的人力资源环境和与患者相关的激励措施会预测医生冲突,而医生冲突与职业倦怠、离职意向和心理安全有关。最值得注意的是,这些前因和结果在不同职业组别之间存在显著差异:我们的研究结果中观察到的这些差异效应表明,管理者在设计和实施预防和改善医生冲突的干预措施时,应分别仔细考虑不同职业群体的需求。简而言之,办公室/文职人员、护士、专业/技术人员和管理人员群体的医生冲突前因后果各不相同,因此需要不同的解决方案。简而言之,医疗机构在改善工作场所关系时应避免一刀切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信