Targeted Virtual Health Literacy Education for Community Health Workers: An Evidenced-Based Quality Improvement Project.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Angela Simmons, Ruth Foreman, Kathleen Tennant
{"title":"Targeted Virtual Health Literacy Education for Community Health Workers: An Evidenced-Based Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Angela Simmons, Ruth Foreman, Kathleen Tennant","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2024-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Low or limited health literacy is a significant problem in the United States as one in three adults in the United States has inadequate health literacy. Low or limited health literacy contributes to poorer health outcomes for patients and increases costs to the consumer and health care system. Strategies that health care professionals can utilize to overcome these barriers include Health Literacy Universal Precautions, Teach Back, and using simple language. <b>Objective:</b> Standardized health literacy training was inconsistent for community health workers (CHWs) resulting in CHWs having difficulty communicating health-related information to the vulnerable populations they serve who often have low to limited health literacy. A contributing factor is the lack of standardized health literacy training, for nonlicensed health care workers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CHWs' knowledge about health literacy and self-efficacy after targeted health literacy training. <b>Methods:</b> A pre-test, teaching intervention, and posttest were administered by the principal investigator using the Health Literacy Knowledge and Experience Survey (HLKES-2) to measure the CHW's knowledge and self-efficacy by comparing pre- and postdata results. Five virtual 2.5-hour targeted health literacy training courses were conducted by the primary investigator over a 4-month period. The participants (<i>n</i> = 50) were a sample of CHWs across several regions of the state of Pennsylvania. <b>Results:</b> There was a statistically significant difference between both the pre- and posttest scores of the HLKES-2 after the training (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in the CHW's health literacy knowledge and a statistically significant change (<i>p</i> < 0.03) in their self-efficacy. Demographics revealed statistically significant changes (<i>p</i> < 0.003) that the higher the education (i.e., secondary education or higher) the better the scores on the HLKES-2 survey. <b>Conclusions:</b> Confident, knowledgeable health care workers can enhance health outcomes for patients with low health literacy in many settings. The combined use of education and technology within standardized, targeted health literacy training can promote support of CHWs. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> Nursing holds a key role in supporting the education of CHWs. This quality improvement study showed a positive correlation between the targeted health literacy training participation and higher knowledge levels and self-efficacy of the CHWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2024-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low or limited health literacy is a significant problem in the United States as one in three adults in the United States has inadequate health literacy. Low or limited health literacy contributes to poorer health outcomes for patients and increases costs to the consumer and health care system. Strategies that health care professionals can utilize to overcome these barriers include Health Literacy Universal Precautions, Teach Back, and using simple language. Objective: Standardized health literacy training was inconsistent for community health workers (CHWs) resulting in CHWs having difficulty communicating health-related information to the vulnerable populations they serve who often have low to limited health literacy. A contributing factor is the lack of standardized health literacy training, for nonlicensed health care workers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CHWs' knowledge about health literacy and self-efficacy after targeted health literacy training. Methods: A pre-test, teaching intervention, and posttest were administered by the principal investigator using the Health Literacy Knowledge and Experience Survey (HLKES-2) to measure the CHW's knowledge and self-efficacy by comparing pre- and postdata results. Five virtual 2.5-hour targeted health literacy training courses were conducted by the primary investigator over a 4-month period. The participants (n = 50) were a sample of CHWs across several regions of the state of Pennsylvania. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between both the pre- and posttest scores of the HLKES-2 after the training (p < 0.0001) in the CHW's health literacy knowledge and a statistically significant change (p < 0.03) in their self-efficacy. Demographics revealed statistically significant changes (p < 0.003) that the higher the education (i.e., secondary education or higher) the better the scores on the HLKES-2 survey. Conclusions: Confident, knowledgeable health care workers can enhance health outcomes for patients with low health literacy in many settings. The combined use of education and technology within standardized, targeted health literacy training can promote support of CHWs. Implications for Nursing: Nursing holds a key role in supporting the education of CHWs. This quality improvement study showed a positive correlation between the targeted health literacy training participation and higher knowledge levels and self-efficacy of the CHWs.

针对社区卫生工作者的虚拟健康素养教育:基于证据的质量改进项目。
背景:健康素养低或有限是美国的一个重要问题,因为美国三分之一的成年人健康素养不足。卫生知识普及程度低或有限会导致患者健康状况恶化,并增加消费者和卫生保健系统的成本。卫生保健专业人员可以用来克服这些障碍的策略包括健康素养、普遍预防措施、回馈教育和使用简单的语言。目的:社区卫生工作者(chw)的标准化卫生素养培训不一致,导致社区卫生工作者难以向他们所服务的弱势群体传达卫生相关信息,这些群体往往卫生素养较低或有限。造成这一现象的一个因素是缺乏针对无证卫生保健工作者的标准化卫生素养培训。本研究的目的是评估保健员在接受有针对性的健康素养培训后的健康素养知识和自我效能感。方法:采用《健康素养知识与经验调查》(HLKES-2),采用前测、教学干预和后测的方法,通过前后数据的比较,对初中生的知识和自我效能感进行测量。在4个月的时间里,主要研究者开展了5个虚拟的2.5小时有针对性的健康素养培训课程。参与者(n = 50)是来自宾夕法尼亚州几个地区的chw样本。结果:中老年妇女健康素养知识培训前后的HLKES-2得分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001),自我效能感培训前后的得分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.03)。人口学数据显示,教育程度越高(即中等教育或以上)的学生在HLKES-2调查中得分越高(p < 0.003)。结论:在许多情况下,自信、知识渊博的卫生保健工作者可以提高低卫生素养患者的健康结果。在标准化、有针对性的卫生知识普及培训中结合使用教育和技术,可促进对卫生工作者的支持。对护理的启示:护理在支持卫生工作者的教育中起着关键作用。本研究结果显示,参与有针对性的健康素养培训与保健员的知识水平和自我效能感呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信