{"title":"Diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care test for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Sudan: A Comparative Accuracy Study.","authors":"Elfadil Abass, Durria Mansour, Zaki Abdalla, Hassan Altaher, Mootaz Sliman, Hussam Osman, Rabie Ali Babiker, Mohamed Salah, Elmohaned Omer, Elwaleed Elamin, Alexander Visekruna, Ulrich Steinhoff, Rouzbeh Mahdavi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0012905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 107 VL suspects who attended a health centre in Gedaref between October 2022 and June 2023. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the performance of the new index test (INgezimLeishma-CROM) with the comparator test (IT-LEISH) and parasitological examination as reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 107 VL suspects screened by parasitological examination, 77 VL patients were smear positive and 30 were smear negative. Independent serological testing of these patients using INgezim Leishma-CROM showed a sensitivity of 98.7% [95% CI 92.23-99.97] and specificity of 92.5% [95% CI 75.71-99.09]. For IT-LEISH, both sensitivity [95% CI 84.39-97.20] and specificity [95% CI 75.71-99.09] were 92.5%. INgezim Leishma-CROM demonstrated increased diagnostic accuracy (97.2%) compared to IT-LEISH RDT (92.5%). Both RDTs gave positive results in 2 cases from the smear negative group that were previously treated for VL. All other non-VL cases (malaria, typhoid, brucellosis) were negative in both RDTs, showing 100% specificity, while VL patients co-infected with malaria were positive in both tests. Within the smear-negative group, 3 VL symptomatic cases that had been previously treated but still show clinical signs were all positive with INgezim Leishma-CROM but only 2 cases were positive with IT-LEISH.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 4","pages":"e0012905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Methods: This study enrolled 107 VL suspects who attended a health centre in Gedaref between October 2022 and June 2023. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the performance of the new index test (INgezimLeishma-CROM) with the comparator test (IT-LEISH) and parasitological examination as reference standard.
Results: Of 107 VL suspects screened by parasitological examination, 77 VL patients were smear positive and 30 were smear negative. Independent serological testing of these patients using INgezim Leishma-CROM showed a sensitivity of 98.7% [95% CI 92.23-99.97] and specificity of 92.5% [95% CI 75.71-99.09]. For IT-LEISH, both sensitivity [95% CI 84.39-97.20] and specificity [95% CI 75.71-99.09] were 92.5%. INgezim Leishma-CROM demonstrated increased diagnostic accuracy (97.2%) compared to IT-LEISH RDT (92.5%). Both RDTs gave positive results in 2 cases from the smear negative group that were previously treated for VL. All other non-VL cases (malaria, typhoid, brucellosis) were negative in both RDTs, showing 100% specificity, while VL patients co-infected with malaria were positive in both tests. Within the smear-negative group, 3 VL symptomatic cases that had been previously treated but still show clinical signs were all positive with INgezim Leishma-CROM but only 2 cases were positive with IT-LEISH.
方法:本研究招募了2022年10月至2023年6月期间在Gedaref一家健康中心就诊的107名VL嫌疑人。将新指标试验(INgezimLeishma-CROM)与比较试验(IT-LEISH)及寄生虫学检查作为参考标准进行比较,评估诊断准确性。结果:经寄生虫学检查筛选出的107例疑似VL患者中,涂片阳性77例,涂片阴性30例。使用INgezim Leishma-CROM对患者进行独立血清学检测,灵敏度为98.7% [95% CI 92.23-99.97],特异性为92.5% [95% CI 75.71-99.09]。对于IT-LEISH,敏感性[95% CI 84.39 ~ 97.20]和特异性[95% CI 75.71 ~ 99.09]均为92.5%。与IT-LEISH RDT(92.5%)相比,INgezim Leishma-CROM的诊断准确率(97.2%)有所提高。两项随机对照试验结果均为阳性,既往接受过VL治疗的涂片阴性组中有2例。所有其他非VL病例(疟疾、伤寒、布鲁氏菌病)在两项RDTs中均为阴性,显示100%的特异性,而合并感染疟疾的VL患者在两项检测中均为阳性。在涂片阴性组中,3例既往治疗但仍有临床症状的VL症状患者均为INgezim Leishma-CROM阳性,仅2例为IT-LEISH阳性。
期刊介绍:
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy.
The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability.
All aspects of these diseases are considered, including:
Pathogenesis
Clinical features
Pharmacology and treatment
Diagnosis
Epidemiology
Vector biology
Vaccinology and prevention
Demographic, ecological and social determinants
Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).