Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Professionals toward Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.

Q3 Medicine
Dharma Rao Vanamali, Himavathy K Gara, Venkata Anil Chandra Dronamraju
{"title":"Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Professionals toward Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.","authors":"Dharma Rao Vanamali, Himavathy K Gara, Venkata Anil Chandra Dronamraju","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.0909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by enhancing diagnostics, treatment planning, and patient management. However, the successful integration of AI depends on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). The study aimed to evaluate the KAP of HCPs regarding the role of AI in healthcare. Additionally, the study aimed to identify key barriers, such as ethical concerns and technical limitations, that hinder AI adoption.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online structured questionnaire targeting doctors, medical students, and nurses. The survey, distributed <i>via</i> Google Forms, measured participants' demographics, KAPs regarding AI. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were employed to recruit a total of 350 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 participants completed the survey, with the majority being medical students (52%) and younger professionals aged 18-27 years (73.1%). AI's primary use was in diagnostics (71.1%), followed by treatment protocol development (45.4%) and drug development (33.1%). Most respondents rated their technical skills as low or very low, with medical students showing slightly higher proficiency compared to nurses and faculty members. Ethical concerns were prominent, with 46% of participants highlighting data privacy and security issues, followed by concerns about high costs (23.7%) and over-reliance on manual processes (16.6%). Significant differences were observed between professions: medical students and faculty were more open to AI's role in making critical decisions (60.98% and 61.94%, respectively) than nurses (29.41%). Additionally, 97% of nurses expressed willingness to undergo AI training compared to 86% of faculty and 82% of medical students. However, confidence in AI's ability to improve clinical outcomes was mixed, with 35.71% agreeing, 29.71% neutral, and 40% regularly using AI tools in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight a positive attitude toward AI in healthcare, with substantial recognition of its benefits, especially in diagnostics. However, significant gaps in knowledge, technical skills, and awareness of ethical issues remain, particularly among nurses. Tailored education and training programs are needed to bridge these gaps and enhance AI readiness in healthcare practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 4","pages":"e6-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.0909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by enhancing diagnostics, treatment planning, and patient management. However, the successful integration of AI depends on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). The study aimed to evaluate the KAP of HCPs regarding the role of AI in healthcare. Additionally, the study aimed to identify key barriers, such as ethical concerns and technical limitations, that hinder AI adoption.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online structured questionnaire targeting doctors, medical students, and nurses. The survey, distributed via Google Forms, measured participants' demographics, KAPs regarding AI. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were employed to recruit a total of 350 participants.

Results: A total of 350 participants completed the survey, with the majority being medical students (52%) and younger professionals aged 18-27 years (73.1%). AI's primary use was in diagnostics (71.1%), followed by treatment protocol development (45.4%) and drug development (33.1%). Most respondents rated their technical skills as low or very low, with medical students showing slightly higher proficiency compared to nurses and faculty members. Ethical concerns were prominent, with 46% of participants highlighting data privacy and security issues, followed by concerns about high costs (23.7%) and over-reliance on manual processes (16.6%). Significant differences were observed between professions: medical students and faculty were more open to AI's role in making critical decisions (60.98% and 61.94%, respectively) than nurses (29.41%). Additionally, 97% of nurses expressed willingness to undergo AI training compared to 86% of faculty and 82% of medical students. However, confidence in AI's ability to improve clinical outcomes was mixed, with 35.71% agreeing, 29.71% neutral, and 40% regularly using AI tools in practice.

Conclusion: The findings highlight a positive attitude toward AI in healthcare, with substantial recognition of its benefits, especially in diagnostics. However, significant gaps in knowledge, technical skills, and awareness of ethical issues remain, particularly among nurses. Tailored education and training programs are needed to bridge these gaps and enhance AI readiness in healthcare practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信