The Suitability of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in Triaging Patients With Penetrating Neck Injuries at a High-Level Trauma Center, in the Western Cape, South Africa.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Thomas Steve Jessop, Lindi Martin, Hendrick J Lategan, Julie M Dixon, Nee-Kofi Moul-Millman, Elmin Steyn
{"title":"The Suitability of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in Triaging Patients With Penetrating Neck Injuries at a High-Level Trauma Center, in the Western Cape, South Africa.","authors":"Thomas Steve Jessop, Lindi Martin, Hendrick J Lategan, Julie M Dixon, Nee-Kofi Moul-Millman, Elmin Steyn","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penetrating injuries are the most common mechanism of serious injury in Cape Town, with penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) having a mortality rate of 10%. The South African Triage Scale (SATS) is commonly used and designed for general emergency departments in South Africa. This study aimed to assess the suitability of the SATS for triaging patients with PNIs at a high-level trauma center, Tygerberg Hospital (TBH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis utilized data from a multicentre prehospital observational study. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with PNIs managed at the TBH Trauma Center between October 2022 and March 2023 were included. Patients dead on arrival were excluded. The original arrival triage categorization was reviewed and re-calculated based on a correct application of the SATS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients (mean age: 32 years, SD: 10) were included. Mechanisms of injury were stab or cut (78.6%) and gunshot wound (21.4%). The most common SATS colors recorded were Orange (61.4%), and Yellow (17.1%), with recalculation of SATS (R-SATS) resulting in \"Orange\" (81.4%) and \"Red\" (18.6%). Under-triage occurred in 25.7% of cases. A significant difference was noted between SATS and R-SATS categories (p < 0.01). There was no significant association between TBH SATS or R-SATS category and need for resuscitation, urgent surgical intervention, and 7-day mortality (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No association could be shown between the SATS colors and life-saving interventions and mortality. Furthermore, findings suggest that the SATS is not optimally applied at TBH. Consideration for a simpler, better-performing tool to optimize triage of patients with traumatic injuries, including PNIs is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Penetrating injuries are the most common mechanism of serious injury in Cape Town, with penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) having a mortality rate of 10%. The South African Triage Scale (SATS) is commonly used and designed for general emergency departments in South Africa. This study aimed to assess the suitability of the SATS for triaging patients with PNIs at a high-level trauma center, Tygerberg Hospital (TBH).

Methods: This secondary analysis utilized data from a multicentre prehospital observational study. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with PNIs managed at the TBH Trauma Center between October 2022 and March 2023 were included. Patients dead on arrival were excluded. The original arrival triage categorization was reviewed and re-calculated based on a correct application of the SATS.

Results: Seventy patients (mean age: 32 years, SD: 10) were included. Mechanisms of injury were stab or cut (78.6%) and gunshot wound (21.4%). The most common SATS colors recorded were Orange (61.4%), and Yellow (17.1%), with recalculation of SATS (R-SATS) resulting in "Orange" (81.4%) and "Red" (18.6%). Under-triage occurred in 25.7% of cases. A significant difference was noted between SATS and R-SATS categories (p < 0.01). There was no significant association between TBH SATS or R-SATS category and need for resuscitation, urgent surgical intervention, and 7-day mortality (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: No association could be shown between the SATS colors and life-saving interventions and mortality. Furthermore, findings suggest that the SATS is not optimally applied at TBH. Consideration for a simpler, better-performing tool to optimize triage of patients with traumatic injuries, including PNIs is needed.

南非分诊量表(SATS)在南非西开普省高级别创伤中心对穿透性颈部损伤患者进行分诊的适用性
背景:穿透性损伤是开普敦最常见的严重损伤机制,穿透性颈部损伤(PNIs)的死亡率为10%。南非分诊分类量表(SATS)是南非普通急诊科常用和设计的。本研究旨在评估SATS对Tygerberg医院(TBH)高水平创伤中心PNIs患者分诊的适用性。方法:该二次分析利用了一项多中心院前观察研究的数据。纳入2022年10月至2023年3月期间在TBH创伤中心治疗的成年PNIs患者(≥18岁)。不包括到达时死亡的患者。在正确应用SATS的基础上,对原始的到达分类进行了审查和重新计算。结果:纳入70例患者,平均年龄32岁,SD: 10。伤机制主要为刺伤或割伤(78.6%)和枪伤(21.4%)。最常见的SATS颜色是橙色(61.4%)和黄色(17.1%),重新计算SATS (R-SATS)导致“橙色”(81.4%)和“红色”(18.6%)。25.7%的病例分诊不足。SATS和R-SATS两组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:SATS颜色与挽救生命的干预措施和死亡率之间没有关联。此外,研究结果表明,SATS在TBH的应用并不理想。需要考虑一种更简单、性能更好的工具来优化外伤性损伤(包括PNIs)患者的分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信