Mechanical Power to Predict Ventilator Liberation in Patients With a Tracheostomy.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Toshiharu Nakama, Takehiro Umemura, Soukun Hoshino, Masahiro Tamashiro, Kenichi Satoh, Hiroshi Sekiguchi
{"title":"Mechanical Power to Predict Ventilator Liberation in Patients With a Tracheostomy.","authors":"Toshiharu Nakama, Takehiro Umemura, Soukun Hoshino, Masahiro Tamashiro, Kenichi Satoh, Hiroshi Sekiguchi","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mechanical power (MP) is useful for predicting the outcomes of attempts to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation. MP is computed based on measured variables derived to determine the power in joules required to breathe while receiving mechanical ventilation. The main objectives of this study were to calculate a cutoff value of MP that would predict successful liberation and to determine the prediction rate of liberation success based on this cutoff value. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center retrospective study. Data from 110 tracheostomized subjects receiving mechanical ventilation were analyzed. We divided subjects into two groups based on ventilator liberation outcome. Confounding factors in subject background were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). Statistically significant differences in MP at tracheostomy and liberation success between liberation success and failure groups were examined. We calculated the MP cutoff value for successful liberation using the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its corresponding prediction rate of liberation success. <b>Results:</b> The number of subjects in the successful liberation group was 79 and that of the failed liberation group was 31. The MP cutoff value and corresponding prediction rate for liberation success were 256.5 J/min (area under the curve-ROC = 0.839) and 92.2%, respectively. After PSM, the low MP group (<i>n =</i> 36), divided based on the MP cutoff value, had a significantly higher liberation success rate than the high MP group (<i>n =</i> 36), with an odds ratio of 19.95 (CI 3.95, 91.23, <i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> MP at tracheostomy was a strong predictor of successful ventilator liberation, and the prediction rate of liberation success based on the MP cutoff value was shown to be very high. We recommend that patients with low MP be actively considered for liberation. In contrast, those with high MP should continue weaning while simultaneously making early transfer arrangements if liberation is unsuccessful.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical power (MP) is useful for predicting the outcomes of attempts to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation. MP is computed based on measured variables derived to determine the power in joules required to breathe while receiving mechanical ventilation. The main objectives of this study were to calculate a cutoff value of MP that would predict successful liberation and to determine the prediction rate of liberation success based on this cutoff value. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. Data from 110 tracheostomized subjects receiving mechanical ventilation were analyzed. We divided subjects into two groups based on ventilator liberation outcome. Confounding factors in subject background were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). Statistically significant differences in MP at tracheostomy and liberation success between liberation success and failure groups were examined. We calculated the MP cutoff value for successful liberation using the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its corresponding prediction rate of liberation success. Results: The number of subjects in the successful liberation group was 79 and that of the failed liberation group was 31. The MP cutoff value and corresponding prediction rate for liberation success were 256.5 J/min (area under the curve-ROC = 0.839) and 92.2%, respectively. After PSM, the low MP group (n = 36), divided based on the MP cutoff value, had a significantly higher liberation success rate than the high MP group (n = 36), with an odds ratio of 19.95 (CI 3.95, 91.23, P < .001). Conclusion: MP at tracheostomy was a strong predictor of successful ventilator liberation, and the prediction rate of liberation success based on the MP cutoff value was shown to be very high. We recommend that patients with low MP be actively considered for liberation. In contrast, those with high MP should continue weaning while simultaneously making early transfer arrangements if liberation is unsuccessful.

机械功率预测气管切开术患者呼吸机解放。
背景:机械功率(MP)可用于预测将患者从机械通气中解放出来的结果。MP是根据测量的变量来计算的,以确定在接受机械通气时呼吸所需的焦耳功率。本研究的主要目的是计算预测成功解放的MP截断值,并根据该截断值确定解放成功的预测率。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究。对110例气管造口术患者接受机械通气的数据进行分析。我们根据呼吸机解放的结果将受试者分为两组。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)调整受试者背景中的混杂因素。观察成功组和失败组气管切开术MP和解放组MP的差异有统计学意义。我们利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积及其相应的释放成功预测率计算成功释放的MP截止值。结果:解放成功组79人,解放失败组31人。MP截止值为256.5 J/min(曲线下面积- roc = 0.839),释放成功率预测值为92.2%。PSM后,以MP截断值划分的低MP组(n = 36)的解放成功率显著高于高MP组(n = 36),优势比为19.95 (CI 3.95, 91.23, P < 0.001)。结论:气管切开术时的呼吸机浓度是预测呼吸机解放成功的重要指标,以呼吸机浓度临界值预测呼吸机解放成功率较高。我们建议积极考虑释放低MP患者。相比之下,那些高MP的人应该继续断奶,同时在解放不成功的情况下尽早安排转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信